Low Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer Mortality Among Enlisted Men Stationed on Nuclear-Powered Submarines in the United States Navy

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 687
Author(s):  
George Friedman-Jimenez ◽  
Ikuko Kato ◽  
Yelena Afanasyeva ◽  
Roy E. Shore
Author(s):  
Stacey A Fedewa ◽  
Ella A Kazerooni ◽  
Jamie L Studts ◽  
Robert A Smith ◽  
Priti Bandi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest computed tomography in older current and former smokers (ie, eligible adults) has been recommended since 2013. Uptake has been slow and variable across the United States. We estimated the LCS rate and growth at the national and state level between 2016 and 2018. Methods The American College of Radiology’s Lung Cancer Screening Registry was used to capture screening events. Population-based surveys, the US Census, and cancer registry data were used to estimate the number of eligible adults and lung cancer mortality (ie, burden). Lung cancer screening rates (SRs) in eligible adults and screening rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure changes by state and year. Results Nationally, the SR was steady between 2016 (3.3%, 95% CI = 3.3% to 3.7%) and 2017 (3.4%, 95% CI = 3.4% to 3.9%), increasing to 5.0% (95% CI = 5.0% to 5.7%) in 2018 (2018 vs 2016 SR ratio = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.51 to 1.62). In 2018, several southern states with a high lung-cancer burden (eg, Mississippi, West Virginia, and Arkansas) had relatively low SRs (<4%) among eligible adults, whereas several northeastern states with lower lung cancer burden (eg, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire) had the highest SRs (12.8%-15.2%). The exception was Kentucky, which had the nation’s highest lung cancer mortality rate and one of the highest SRs (13.7%). Conclusions Fewer than 1 in 20 eligible adults received LCS nationally, and uptake varied widely across states. LCS rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden across states, except for Kentucky, which has supported comprehensive efforts to implement LCS.


1951 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-78
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Wickham

During World War II, Raleigh Schorling gave extensively of his time and knowledge to the Training Program of the United States Navy. The idea of a Navy training program was not entirely new. In fact, as far back as World War I, the Navy had instituted a system of Training Course Manuals for use by enlisted men who were striving for promotion in their respective rates. However, the available training courses in all ratings were limited in number and, at the time of Pearl Harbor, considerably outdated. Naval Aviation meanwhile had become a large and extremely important part of the Navy. There were more than 22 regular aviation ratings and 13 specialist designations, but only four training manuals.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 686-687
Author(s):  
George Friedman-Jimenez ◽  
Ikuko Kato ◽  
Yelena Afanasyeva ◽  
Roy E. Shore

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
George Friedman-Jimenez ◽  
Ikuko Kato ◽  
Pam Factor-Litvak ◽  
Roy Shore

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document