scholarly journals 50P Efficacy and safety of pemigatinib in Chinese patients with unresectable, advanced/ recurrent or metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement that failed to prior systemic therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S377
Author(s):  
G-M. Shi ◽  
X-Y. Huang ◽  
T-F. Wen ◽  
T-Q. Song ◽  
M. Kuang ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1476-1482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph K Jordan

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of efalizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966–May 2005%) using the key words hu1124, anti-CD11a, efalizumab, Raptiva, Xanelim, and psoriasis was conducted. References of identified articles were reviewed for additional citations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical trials evaluating the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of efalizumab for treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults were included in our review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Efalizumab's ability to inhibit the binding of CD11a, a subunit of leukocyte function–associated antigen type 1, to intracellular adhesion molecule 1 results in decreased T-cell activation and migration, 2 key steps in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. Results of clinical trials have demonstrated that efalizumab administered subcutaneously is a safe and effective treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Efalizumab was well tolerated in trials, with the majority of adverse events arising with the first dose and decreasing with subsequent doses. The high cost of this agent and lack of head-to-head trials with other drugs will likely restrict its use to patients who have failed prior systemic therapy or phototherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Efalizumab is a safe and effective therapy for treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in patients who have failed prior systemic therapy or phototherapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S297
Author(s):  
Koichi Goto ◽  
Oliver Gautschi ◽  
Alexander Drilon ◽  
Daniel Shao Weng Tan ◽  
Geoffrey R. Oxnard ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
V.  V. Breder ◽  
D.  T. Abdurakhmanov ◽  
V.  V. Petkau ◽  
P.  V. Balakhnin ◽  
M.  V. Volkonsky ◽  
...  

There is a number of unresolved issues regarding the systemic therapy administration for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Their solution is facilitated by accumulating real‑world study results. Lenvatinib therapy is a recognized drug with a good efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of HCC. Subanalyses of the REFLECT study showed that the absence of stratification by baseline AFP and baseline liver function, as well as the lack of options for subsequent drug therapy after lenvatinib, also affects the outcomes. Once these factors are taken into account, the hypothesis of superiority of lenvatinib to sorafenib and other drugs can be tested. Real‑world clinical studies have demonstrated positive results of lenvatinib therapy in patients with Child‑Pugh class B liver function, provided recommendations on the sequence of systemic therapy after lenvatinib and on the use of lenvatinib in patients with BCLC stage B, along with considering the possibility of lenvatinib monotherapy and the prospects for its use in patients with nHCC. Further real‑world studies of lenvatinib for HCC in the Russian population are required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document