Characterization of flue gas in oxy-coal combustion processes for CO2 capture

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukun Hu ◽  
Jinyue Yan
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 550-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse G. Thompson ◽  
Reynolds Frimpong ◽  
Joseph E. Remias ◽  
Jim K. Neathery ◽  
Kunlei Liu

Author(s):  
Soumya Jyoti Chatterjee ◽  
Goutam Khankari ◽  
Sujit Karmakar

The comparative performance study is carried out for 500 MW Supercritical (SupC) Oxy-Coal Combustion (OCC) and Air-Coal Combustion (ACC) power plants with membrane-based CO2 capture at the fixed furnace temperature. The proposed configurations are modelled using a computer-based analysis software 'Cycle-Tempo' at different operating conditions, and the detailed thermodynamic study is done by considering Energy, Exergy, and Environmental (3-E) analysis. The result shows that the net energy and exergy efficiencies of ACC power plants with CO2 capture are about 35.07 % and 30.88 %, respectively, which are about 6.44 % and 5.77 % points, respectively higher than that of OCC power plant. Auxiliary power consumption of OCC based power plant is almost 1.97 times more than that of the ACC based plant due to huge energy utilization in the Air Separation Unit (ASU) of OCC plant which leads to performance reduction in OCC plant. However, environmental benefit of OCC based power plant is more than that of ACC based power plant with respect to CO2 emission. OCC plant emits about 0.164 kg/kWh of CO2 which is approximately 16.75 times lower than the CO2 emission in ACC based power plant. It is also analyzed that the performance of the CO2 Capture Unit (CCU) for the OCC based plant is about 3.65 times higher than the ACC based power plant due to higher concentration of CO2 (nearly 80.63%) in the flue gas emitting from OCC plant. The study also reveals that the auxiliary power consumption per kg of CO2 capture of the OCC based plant is about 0.142 kWh/kg, which is approximately 0.06 times lower than the ACC based plant. The higher performance of the OCC based power plant is found at lower value of flue gas recirculation due to the fact that reduction in exergy destruction at the mixing zone of the combustor is higher than the increase in exergy destruction of the heat exchangers at higher furnace exit temperature. But the metallurgical temperature limit of boiler tube materials restricts the use of the higher value of furnace temperature. OCC based power plant with CO2 capture can be preferred over ACC based plant with CO2 capture due to higher environmental benefits towards mitigating CO2, the key greenhouse gas on earth in spite of exhibiting lesser energy and exergy efficiencies.


Author(s):  
V.V. Kolesnyk ◽  
V.M. Orlyk ◽  
V.A. Zhaivoronok

In the article the comparative analysis of energy consumption in the process of combustion of solid fuel containing sulfur compounds, while simultaneously feeding directly into the fire space of the boiler of carbonate sorbents (CaCO3, Ca(OH)2, CaO) for the absorption of formed sulfur dioxide, as is the case in dry methods of flue gas desulphurization, was presented. The calculations were made when supplying sorbents in a stoichiometric ratio and with a triple excess sorbent. It was shown that the energy costs for decomposition and heating of CaCO3 and Ca(OH)2 or only the heating of CaO when applied in the dry method desulphurization are practically compensated by the secondary reactions of the sequestration of sulfur dioxide. A simple and practical method for determining the temperature of a stationary state with simultaneous flow of coal combustion processes and sulfur dioxide chemisorption by carbonate sorbents was proposed, which is essential for choosing a temperature range in which sulfur is actively absorbed without decomposition of CaSO4 formed. Bibl. 6, Fig. 3, Tab. 1.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Hornbostel ◽  
Du Nguyen ◽  
William Bourcier ◽  
Jennifer Knipe ◽  
Matthew Worthington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flue Gas ◽  

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. V. Krasinsky ◽  
V. V. Salomatov ◽  
I. S. Anufriev ◽  
O. V. Sharypov ◽  
E. Yu. Shadrin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document