Poster 63 Paretic Upper Extremity Movement Gains are Retained 3 Months After Training with an Electrical Stimulation Neuroprosthesis

2013 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. e33
Author(s):  
Stephen Page ◽  
Andre Persch ◽  
Colleen Murray
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Upper Extremity Movement

scholarly journals Assessment of upper extremity movement performance of patients with obstetric brachial plexus palsy

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ligia C. S. Fonseca ◽  
Annika K. Nelke ◽  
Jörg Bahm ◽  
Catherine Disselhorst-Klug
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Objective Data ◽  
Brachial Plexus Palsy ◽  
Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy ◽  
Movement Performance ◽  
Obstetric Brachial Plexus ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Acceleration Signals ◽  
Upper Extremity Movement

Abstract:Coping strategies of patients with obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) are highly individual. Up to now, individual movement performance is assessed by visual observations of physicians or therapists - a procedure, which is highly subjective and lacks objective data. However, objective data about the individual movement performance are the key to evidence-based and individualized treatment. In this paper, a new approach is presented, which provides objective information about the upper extremity movement performance of patients with OBPP. The approach is based on the use of accelerometers in combination with a classification procedure. The movement performance of 10 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with OBPP has been evaluated by experienced physiotherapists and has been assigned to one of 4 categories representing the Mallet Scale (MS) IV to I. Three triaxial-accelerometers were placed at chest, upper arm and wrist of the affected side of the patient. Acceleration signals have been recorded during repetitive movements with relevance regarding daily life. Here, especially the results from the “hand to mouth” task are presented. From the 9 recorded acceleration signals 13 relevant features were extracted. For each of the 13 features 4 thresholds have been determined distinguishing best between the 4 patient categories of the MS and the healthy subjects. With respect to the thresholds each feature value has been assigned to the discrete numbers 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4. Afterwards, each discrete number has been weighted by a factor regarding the correlation between the feature’s value and the MS score. The resulting weighted discrete numbers of all 13 features have been added resulting in a score, which quantifies the individual upper extremity movement performance. Based on this score the movement performance of each patient has been assigned to the classes “very good”, “good”, “regular” and “bad”. All movements of the 10 healthy volunteers were classified as “very good”. The movement performance of two patients MS IV were classified as “very good” as well and the movements of the other 16 patients as “good”. The movements of the entire group of MS III patients fell into the class “regular”. Just one MS II patient was assigned to the class “regular” while the others were classified as “bad”. It was not possible to classify the movements of MS I patients. This was mainly due to the fact that none of these patients MS I was able to complete the task successfully. The developed approach demonstrated its ability to quantify the movement performance of upper extremity movements based on accelerometers. This provides an easy to use tool to assess patient’s movement strategies during daily tasks for diagnosis and rehabilitation.

Effects of Mirror Therapy Combined With EMG-triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation to Improve on Upper Extremity Function in Patient with Chronic Stroke

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo Yeol Jung ◽  
Pong Sub Youn ◽  
Dong Hoon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Functional Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Chronic Stroke ◽  
Mirror Therapy ◽  
Extremity Function ◽  
Upper Extremity Function

AbstractThis study was performed to evaluate the effects of Mirror therapy combined with EMG-triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation on upper extremity function in patient with Chronic Stroke. A total of 24 chronic stroke patients were divided into 3 groups. Group I (n=8) was given with traditional physical therapy (TPT), group II (n=7) was given with traditional physical therapy and mirror therapy (MT), and group III (n=9) was given with traditional physical therapy and mirror therapy in conjunction with EMG-triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation (EMGFES-MT). Each group performed one hour a day 5 times a week for 6 weeks.We obtained the following result between before and after treatments about changes of elbow flexion muscle strength (EFMS), elbow extension muscle strength (EEMS), wrist flexion muscle strength (WFMS), wrist extension muscle strength (WEMS), elbow flexion range of motion (EFROM), elbow extension range of motion (EEROM), wrist flexion range of motion (WFROM), wrist extension range of motion (WEROM), grip strength (GS) and upper extremity function.Each group showed a significant difference in EFMS, EEMS, WFMS, WEMS, EFROM, EEROM, WFROM, WEROM, GS and upper extremity function (p<0.05) EMFES-MT group revealed significant differences in EEMS, WEROM, grip strength and upper extremity function as compared to the other groups (p<0.05). No difference was found in the change of spasticity among the 3 groups.Our results showed that EMFES-MT was more effective on elbow, WFMS, WEMS, AROM, grip strength and upper extremity function in patients with chronic stroke. We suggest that this study will be able to be used as an intervention data for recovering upper extremity function in chronic stroke patients

scholarly journals Activity-Based Electrical Stimulation Training in a Stroke Patient With Minimal Movement in the Paretic Upper Extremity

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 595-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Page ◽  
Samantha Maslyn ◽  
Valerie Hill Hermann ◽  
Andy Wu ◽  
Kari Dunning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Stroke Patient

scholarly journals Relation of Accelerometer and EMG Recordings for the Measurement of Upper Extremity Movement

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Keil ◽  
Thomas Elbert ◽  
Edward Taub
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Real World ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Activities Of Daily Life ◽  
Strong Relation ◽  
Integrated Emg ◽  
Male Subjects ◽  
Upper Extremity Movement

Abstract In order to determine the value of accelerometry as a measure of real world outcome when a subject is outside the laboratory, accelerometer recordings from the wrist were compared with simultaneous electromyogram (EMG) recordings from the lower and upper arm. Accelerometer and EMG signals were recorded simultaneously by the “Kölner Vitaport System,” an ambulatory device. Six male subjects performed standardized tasks as well as activities of daily life (ADL). Low correlations between accelerometer counts and integrated EMG were found in the standardized tasks, whereas there were considerably higher correlations for ADL. However, there was a strong relation between several parameters derived from EMG and accelerometer recordings. The two techniques appear to measure different aspects of movement and may be complementary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document