scholarly journals Measurement Characteristics and Clinical Utility of the Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale in People With Incontinence and Multiple Sclerosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-410
Author(s):  
Jordan Keller ◽  
Lindsay Long ◽  
Kristian Nitsch ◽  
Jill Smiley
Author(s):  
Samira Zarrabi-Ajami ◽  
Hadi Zamanian ◽  
Mohammadali Amini-Tehrani ◽  
Zahra Farhadidanaloo ◽  
Razieh Janati Razavi ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Iren Akbiyik ◽  
Vildan Sumbuloglu ◽  
Zafer Guney ◽  
Kadriye Armutlu ◽  
Nilufer Korkmaz ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1943-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Baroin ◽  
Gilles Chopard ◽  
Gaye Siliman ◽  
Clément Michoudet ◽  
Aurore Vivot ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 372-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
C R Nicholl ◽  
N B Lincoln ◽  
E D Playford

Objective: To investigate whether the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (EADL) is reliable and valid for the assessment of disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Design: Questionnaire measures were administered on two occasions four months apart. Subjects: A total of 240 patients recruited through a randomized controlled trial of cognitive assessment and treatment in MS. Measures: The Nottingham EADL, Guys Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS) and SF-36 quality of life scale. Results: The EADL items did not form a Guttman Scale (CR 0.8, CS 0.3). The EADL and its four subscales all had high internal consistency (α 0.72-0.94). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory (rs 0.81-0.90) with a mean difference in scores on the two occasions of 0.29. Factor analysis generally supported the subscale structure. There were significant but weak correlations with quality of life measures. Conclusions: The EADL shows promise for the assessment of disability in MS, but the range of items needs to be extended. Further evaluation of the scale seems warranted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-159
Author(s):  
Nada Otmani ◽  
Nabil Tachfouti ◽  
Angela Filankembo ◽  
Nadia Benaicha ◽  
Mariam Atassi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-182
Author(s):  
Shawn M. Fitzgerald ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Phillip D. Rumrill ◽  
Malachy Bishop ◽  
William R. Merchant

Rehabilitation counseling researchers seeking to more fully understand the phenomenon of psychosocial adaptation to disability are devoting increased attention to the impact of disability on quality of life (QOL). This impact has been of particular interest among multiple sclerosis (MS) researchers. The complex etiology, unpredictable nature, and the multiple functional limitations attendant to MS have been identified as major impediments in research efforts to develop psychometrically sound and clinically sensitive tools to evaluate the impact of MS on QOL. This article presents the results of a confirmatory factor analysis of the factor structure of the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS), which has been used in several studies to evaluate the impact of MS on QOL. The QOLS was developed to assess the self-reported QOL of people with chronic pain and evaluates the degree of satisfaction with 7 distinct domains of personal and social activity. The developers’ original principal component analysis revealed a single-factor model with high levels of internal consistency reliability. It is not clear, however, how the 1-factor model fits the population of individuals with MS and how the 7 items perform in terms of their measurement of the single factor. The 1-factor structure of the QOLS did not fit the data well in this sample of individuals with MS. Subsequent model iterations that incorporated 3 error covariances provided increasingly better fit and resulted in a reasonable model fit to the data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document