Correlation between Pressure Loss and Heat Transfer Coefficient in Boiling Flows in Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers with Semicircular and Circular Mini-channels

2021 ◽  
pp. 117963
Author(s):  
Yohei Kubo ◽  
Sayaka Yamada ◽  
Hideki Murakawa ◽  
Hitoshi Asano
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Pressure Loss ◽  
Printed Circuit ◽  
Mini Channels

Flow Boiling Study in Mini-Channels

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesc Madrid ◽  
Nadia Caney ◽  
Philippe Marty
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Test Section ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Mini Channels ◽  
Vapour Quality ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

Mini-channel heat exchangers improve thermal performance in comparison to conventional macro-channel heat exchangers, being highly efficient, compact and requiring low fluid mass. However, classical correlations for two-phase flow in macro-channels fail in predicting the heat transfer coefficient in mini-channels. Therefore, new studies are needed in order to provide better knowledge on flow boiling phenomena in confined spaces. The proposed paper presents an experimental study on two-phase vertical flow boiling in mini-channels. The aim of this work is to determine the heat transfer coefficient and to study the pressure drop in a mini-channel heat exchanger (hydraulic diameter of 840μm) in order to obtain better understanding of the flow boiling mechanisms. A vertical upward flow test section is connected to a primary HFE-7100 circuit. A preheater imposes a given sub-cooled fluid temperature or a given two-phase vapour quality at the inlet. Downstream in the test loop, the fluid is condensed and pumped again into the test section. The pressure drop and the heat transfer coefficient in the test section have been measured for a variety of conditions. Different heat flux, inlet vapour quality and mass flow rate values have been tested. For the heat transfer coefficient, a correlating model is proposed as a function of the superficial velocity. This parameter appears to be much more appropriate than the vapour quality or the mass flow rate for dry-out occurrence prediction. A single critical velocity value has been found.

The Effect of Baffles in Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers

2009 ◽  
Vol 62-64 ◽  
pp. 694-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Akpabio ◽  
I.O. Oboh ◽  
E.O. Aluyor
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Proper Position ◽  
Process Industries ◽  
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Shell And Tube ◽  
Optimal Values ◽  
Side Flow

Shell and tube heat exchangers in their various construction modifications are probably the most widespread and commonly used basic heat exchanger configuration in the process industries. There are many modifications of the basic configuration which can be used to solve special problems. Baffles serve two functions: Most importantly, they support the tubes in the proper position during assembly and operation and prevent vibration of the tubes caused by flow-induced eddies, and secondly, they guide the shell-side flow back and forth across the tube field, increasing the velocity and the heat transfer coefficient. The objective of this paper is to find the baffle spacing at fixed baffle cut that will give us the optimal values for the overall heat transfer coefficient. To do this Microsoft Excel 2003 package was employed. The results obtained from previous studies showed that to obtain optimal values for the overall heat transfer coefficient for the shell and tube heat exchangers a baffle cut of 20 to 25 percent of the diameter is common and the maximum spacing depends on how much support the tubes need. This was used to validate the results obtained from this study.

A Critical Review on the Determination of Pressure Drop During Condensation in Smooth and Enhanced Tubes

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Selim Dalkiliç ◽  
Ali Celen ◽  
Mohamed M. Awad ◽  
Somchai Wongwises
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Experimental Data ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Critical Review ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Numerical Analyses ◽  
Enhanced Tubes

Heat exchangers using in-tube condensation have great significance in the refrigeration, automotive and process industries. Effective heat exchangers have been rapidly developed due to the demand for more compact systems, higher energy efficiency, lower material costs and other economic incentives. Enhanced surfaces, displaced enhancement devices, swirl-flow devices and surface tension devices improve the heat transfer coefficients in these heat exchangers. This study is a critical review on the determination of the condensation heat transfer coefficient of pure refrigerants flowing in vertical and horizontal tubes. The authors’ previous publications on this issue, including the experimental, theoretical and numerical analyses are summarized here. The lengths of the vertical and horizontal test sections varied between 0.5 m and 4 m countercurrent flow double-tube heat exchangers with refrigerant flowing in the inner tube and cooling water flowing in the annulus. The measured data are compared to theoretical and numerical predictions based on the solution of the artificial intelligence methods and CFD analyses for the condensation process in the smooth and enhanced tubes. The theoretical solutions are related to the design of double tube heat exchangers in refrigeration, air conditioning and heat pump applications. Detailed information on the in-tube condensation studies of heat transfer coefficient in the literature is given. A genetic algorithm (GA), various artificial neural network models (ANN) such as multilayer perceptron (MLP), radial basis networks (RBFN), generalized regression neural network (GRNN), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and various optimization techniques such as unconstrained nonlinear minimization algorithm-Nelder-Mead method (NM), non-linear least squares error method (NLS), and Ansys CFD program are used in the numerical solutions. It is shown that the convective heat transfer coefficient of laminar and turbulent condensing film flows can be predicted by means of theoretical and numerical analyses reasonably well if there is a sufficient amount of reliable experimental data. Regression analysis gave convincing correlations, and the most suitable coefficients of the proposed correlations are depicted as compatible with the large number of experimental data by means of the computational numerical methods.

Heat Transfer Performance of Different Nanofluids Flows in a Helically Coiled Heat Exchanger

2013 ◽  
Vol 832 ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Alam Khairul ◽  
Rahman Saidur ◽  
Altab Hossain ◽  
Mohammad Abdul Alim ◽  
Islam Mohammed Mahbubul
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Friction Factor ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Heat Transfer Performance ◽  
Volume Concentration ◽  
Transfer Performance

Helically coiled heat exchangers are globally used in various industrial applications for their high heat transfer performance and compact size. Nanofluids can provide excellent thermal performance of this type of heat exchangers. In the present study, the effect of different nanofluids on the heat transfer performance in a helically coiled heat exchanger is examined. Four different types of nanofluids CuO/water, Al2O3/water, SiO2/water, and ZnO/water with volume fractions 1 vol.% to 4 vol.% was used throughout this analysis and volume flow rate was remained constant at 3 LPM. Results show that the heat transfer coefficient is high for higher particle volume concentration of CuO/water, Al2O3/water and ZnO/water nanofluids, while the values of the friction factor and pressure drop significantly increase with the increase of nanoparticle volume concentration. On the contrary, low heat transfer coefficient was found in higher concentration of SiO2/water nanofluids. The highest enhancement of heat transfer coefficient and lowest friction factor occurred for CuO/water nanofluids among the four nanofluids. However, highest friction factor and lowest heat transfer coefficient were found for SiO2/water nanofluids. The results reveal that, CuO/water nanofluids indicate significant heat transfer performance for helically coiled heat exchanger systems though this nanofluids exhibits higher pressure drop.

Performance Study of Heat Exchangers with Continuous Helical Baffles on Different Inclination Angles

2013 ◽  
Vol 655-657 ◽  
pp. 461-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Fang Song
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Three Dimensional Model ◽  
Shell Side ◽  
Inclination Angles

The three-dimensional model of heat exchangers with continuous helical baffles was built. The fluid flow dynamics and heat transfer of shell side in the helical baffled heat exchanger were simulated and calculated. The velocity, pressure and temperature distributions were achieved. The simulation shows that with the same baffle pitch, shell-side heat transfer coefficient increased by 25% and the pressure drop decreases by 18% in helical baffled heat exchanger compared with segmental helical baffles. With the analyzing of the flow and heat transfer in heat exchanger in 5 different inclination angles from 11°to 21°, it can be found that both shell side heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop will reduce respectively by 86% and 52% with the increases 11°to 21°of the inclination angles. Numerical simulation provided reliable theoretical reference for further engineering research of heat exchanger with helical baffles.

scholarly journals Enhancement of Impingement Heat Transfer With the Crossflow Normal to Ribs and Pins Between Each Row of Holes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abubakar M. El-Jummah ◽  
Gordon E. Andrews ◽  
John E. J. Staggs
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Pressure Loss ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Hole Density ◽  
Impingement Heat Transfer ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Flow Maldistribution

Impingement heat transfer investigations with obstacle (fins) on the target surface were carried out with the obstacles aligned normal to the cross-flow. Conjugate heat transfer (CHT) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis were used for the geometries previously been investigated experimentally. A 10 × 10 row of impingement jet holes or hole density, n, of 4306 m−2 with ten rows of holes in the cross-flow direction was used. The impingement hole pitch X to diameter D, X/D, and gap Z to diameter, Z/D, ratios were kept constant at 4.66 and 3.06 for X, D and Z of 15.24, 3.27 and 10.00 mm, respectively. Nimonic 75 test walls were used with a thickness of 6.35 mm. Two different shaped obstacles of the same flow blockage were investigated: a continuous rectangular ribbed wall of 4.5 mm height, H, and 3.0 mm thick and 8 mm high rectangular pin-fins that were 8.6 mm wide and 3.0 mm thick. The obstacles were equally spaced on the centre-line between each row of impingement jets and aligned normal to the cross-flow. The two obstacles had height to diameter ratios, H/D, of 1.38 and 2.45, respectively. Comparison of the predictions and experimental results were made for the flow pressure loss, ΔP/P, and the surface average heat transfer coefficient (HTC), h. The computations were carried out for air coolant mass flux, G, of 1.08, 1.48 and 1.94 kg/sm2bar. The pressure loss and surface average HTC for all the predicted G showed reasonable agreement with the experimental results, but the predictions for surface averaged h were below the measured values by 5–10%. The predictions showed that the main effect of the ribs and pins was to increase the pressure loss, which led to an increased flow maldistribution between the ten rows of holes. This led to lower heat transfer over the first 5 holes and higher heat transfer over the last 3 holes and the net result was little benefit of either obstacle relative to a smooth wall. The results were significantly worse than the same obstacles aligned for co-flow, where the flow maldistribution changes were lower and there was a net benefit of the obstacles on the surface averaged heat transfer coefficient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document