Impact of rice straw management strategies on rice rhizosphere microbiomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 167 ◽  
pp. 104036
Author(s):  
Vanessa Otero-Jiménez ◽  
Jibda del Pilar Carreño-Carreño ◽  
Emiliano Barreto-Hernandez ◽  
Jan Dirk van Elsas ◽  
Daniel Uribe-Vélez
Author(s):  
Lakhvir Singh ◽  
Balraj Singh Brar

Rice straw is one of the organic materials and natural residue of rice crop or paddy material and is the third-largest residue from agriculture after sugarcane bagasse and maize straw. Southeast Asian countries produce approximately 80% of rice production in the world. It leads to a large quantity of rice straw as a by-product every year. Surplus rice straw is a focal issue associated with storage of rice straw, removal of entire straw from the field, and very little time between the cultivation of the crop. Stubble burning is a quick, cheap, and efficient way to prepare the soil bed for wheat, the next crop. Rice straw has both nutrient and calorific values. Straw is the only organic material available in significant quantities to most rice farmers. About 40 percent of the nitrogen (N), 30 to 35 percent of the phosphorus (P), 80 to 85 percent of the potassium (K), and 40 to 50 percent of the sulfur (S) taken up by rice remains in vegetative plant parts at crop maturity. Straw is either removed from the field, burned in situ, piled or spread in the field, or incorporated in the soil. Open burning of the crop residue kills useful microflora of soil, leads to soil degradation, and contributes to harmful greenhouse gases such as SO2, NO2, CH4, N2O, carbon monoxide in the atmosphere including the hydrocarbon and particulate matter. Therefore, rice straw burning is a serious creator of environmental pollution. The study investigated environment-friendly options of rice straw such as bedding material for cattle, mushroom cultivation, nutrition in the soil, power generation, combustion material, pellet making, bio-gas, bio-ethanol, bio-char, acoustic material, 3D objects, cardboard and composite board, packaging materials, production of bio-composite, cement bricks, and handmade paper. The key purpose of this paper is to provide environmentally friendly alternatives to rice straw instead of open field burning.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-224
Author(s):  
Su–Hun KIM ◽  
Deogratius LUYIMA ◽  
Jae-Hong KIM ◽  
Jae–Han LEE ◽  
Yoshiyuki SHINOGI ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Bird ◽  
Alison J. Eagle ◽  
William Horwath ◽  
Mike W. Hair ◽  
Eric Zilbert ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen-Van-Hung ◽  
Bjoern Ole Sander ◽  
James Quilty ◽  
Carlito Balingbing ◽  
Angeli Grace Castalone ◽  
...  

AbstractThe research provided scientific evidences for improved rice straw management. Rice cultivation with in-field burning of rice straw is the worst option with the lowest energy efficiency and highest air pollution emission. This article comprises a comparative assessment of energy efficiency and the environmental footprint of rice production using four different rice straw management scenarios, namely, straw retained, straw burned, partial straw removal, and complete straw removal. Paddy yield, grain quality, and energy balance were assessed for two seasons while greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) were measured weekly starting from land preparation through to the cropping and fallow period. Despite the added energy requirements in straw collection and transport, the use of collected rice straw for mushroom production can increase the net energy obtained from rice production systems by 10–15% compared to burning straw in the field. Partial and complete removal of rice straw reduces GHGE by 30% and 40% compared to complete straw retention, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document