scholarly journals Evaluation of the potential redistribution of chromium fractionation in contaminated soil by citric acid/sodium citrate washing

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. S539-S545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Li ◽  
Xuelian Yang ◽  
Lili Liang ◽  
Shuhai Guo
2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Cavassim ◽  
Fábio Renato Manzolli Leite ◽  
Daniela Leal Zandim ◽  
Andrea Abi Rached Dantas ◽  
Ricardo Samih Georges Abi Rached ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tang Qiang ◽  
Gu Fan ◽  
Gao Yufeng ◽  
Inui Toru ◽  
Katsumi Takeshi

1935 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh L. Templeton ◽  
H.H. Sommer
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Zhihong Guo ◽  
Shuqin Zhang ◽  
Dajun Ren ◽  
Xiaoqing Zhang ◽  
Shuang Liu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Asselin ◽  
Jani C. Ingram

Biosurfactants have recently gained attention as “green” agents that can be used to enhance the remediation of heavy metals and some organic matter in contaminated soils. The overall objective of this paper was to investigate rhamnolipid, a microbial produced biosurfactant, and its ability to leach uranium present in contaminated soil from an abandoned mine site. Soil samples were collected from two locations in northern Arizona: Cameron (site of open pit mining) and Leupp (control—no mining). The approach taken was to first determine the total uranium content in each soil using a hydrofluoric acid digestion, then comparing the amount of metal removed by rhamnolipid to other chelating agents EDTA and citric acid, and finally determining the amount of soluble metal in the soil matrix using a sequential extraction. Results suggested a complex system for metal removal from soil utilizing rhamnolipid. It was determined that rhamnolipid at a concentration of 150 μM was as effective as EDTA but not as effective as citric acid for the removal of soluble uranium. However, the rhamnolipid was only slightly better at removing uranium from the mining soil compared to a purified water control. Overall, this study demonstrated that rhamnolipid ability to remove uranium from contaminated soil is comparable to EDTA and to a lesser extent citric acid, but, for the soils investigated, it is not significantly better than a simple water wash.


2015 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 546-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fujun Ma ◽  
Changsheng Peng ◽  
Deyi Hou ◽  
Bin Wu ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 183-185 ◽  
pp. 1437-1441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Li Liang ◽  
Shu Cai Li ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
Xue Lian Yang ◽  
Bo Wu ◽  
...  

The effects of various extractants removing Cr from the soil of chromite ore processing residue (COPR) deposited sites were studied in order to select the optimal extractant agent. The effects of this agent on the removal of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in the contaminated soil were also investigated. The results showed that organic complexing agents had higher removal efficiency than that of inorganic complexing agents due to the high content of Cr(III) in the soil(90.3%). The Cr removal of citric/sodium citrate (mole ratio: 1:1) was 35.95% in 24h. The reason why citric/sodium citrate removed more Cr than other agents is that citric can solubilize the mineral matrix, compete for the surfaces sites to desorb Cr(VI) and remove Cr(III) by its complexation. The concentration radio of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in the initial soil was 0.11. Thus improving the removal of Cr(III)is the key point of improving the total Cr removal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document