The Impact of Body Mass Index on Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Complications Following Primary Hip Arthroplasty

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) changes in: (1) pain, function and global health; and (2) predictors of PROMs in patients undergoing aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) using a multilevel model with patients nested within surgeon. Methods: A prospective cohort of 216 patients with baseline and 1-year PROMs who underwent aseptic rTHA between January 2016 and December 2017 were analysed. The most common indication for rTHA was aseptic loosening, instability, and implant failure. The PROMs included in this study were HOOS Pain and HOOS Physical Function Short-form (PS), Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (MCS). Multivariable linear regression models were constructed for predicting 1-year PROMs. Results: Mean 1-year PROMs improvement for aseptic revisions were 30.4 points for HOOS Pain and 22.1 points for HOOS PS. Predictors of better pain relief were patients with higher baseline pain scores. Predictors of better 1-year function were patients with higher baseline function and patients with a posterolateral hip surgical approach during revision. Although VR-12 PCS scores had an overall improvement, nearly 50% of patients saw no improvement or had worse physical component scores. Only 30.7% of patients reported improvements in VR-12 MCS. Conclusions: Overall, patients undergoing aseptic rTHA improved in pain and function PROMs at 1 year. Although global health assessment improved overall, nearly half of aseptic rTHA patients reported no change in physical/mental health status. The associations highlighted in this study can help guide the shared decision-making process by setting expectations before aseptic revision THA.

Download Full-text

Early postoperative relationship between patient-reported outcome measures and gait biomechanical factors after total hip arthroplasty

Gait & Posture ◽

10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.10.003 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 91 ◽

pp. 14-18

Author(s):

Yasushi Kurihara ◽

Hironori Ohsugi ◽

Tadamitsu Matsuda ◽

Tomonari Tosaka ◽

Yuki Endo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Total Hip ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Biomechanical Factors

Download Full-text

The Impact of a Gap Balancing or Measured Resection Surgical Technique on Posterior Condylar Offset and Patient Reported Outcome Measures

OrthoMedia ◽

10.1302/3114-220802 ◽

2022 ◽

Keyword(s):

Surgical Technique ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Gap Balancing ◽

Posterior Condylar Offset ◽

Measured Resection ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Posterior Condylar ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

Estimating recruitment rates for routine use of patient reported outcome measures and the impact on provider comparisons

BMC Health Services Research ◽

10.1186/1472-6963-14-66 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Andrew Hutchings ◽

Jenny Neuburger ◽

Jan van der Meulen ◽

Nick Black

Keyword(s):

Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

The Impact of a Gluten-Free Diet on Celiac Disease: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Two Cases Using NIH Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMIS, NTCB, and Neuro-QoL)

Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings ◽

10.1007/s10880-020-09698-5 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 27 (3) ◽

pp. 444-453 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jeffrey E. Cassisi ◽

Emily J. Ross ◽

Helize Vivier ◽

Nicholas James ◽

Le-Chu Su

Keyword(s):

Celiac Disease ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Comprehensive Evaluation ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Gluten Free Diet ◽

Gluten Free ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in paediatric otolaryngology

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology ◽

10.1017/s0022215117002420 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 132 (1) ◽

pp. 2-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

J Powell ◽

S Powell ◽

A Robson

Keyword(s):

Outcome Measures ◽

English Language ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Paediatric Population ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Specific Patient ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Impact

AbstractBackground:Recently, there has been increased emphasis on the development and application of patient-reported outcome measures. This drive to assess the impact of illness or interventions, from the patient's perspective, has resulted in a greater number of available questionnaires. The importance of selecting an appropriate patient-reported outcome measure is specifically emphasised in the paediatric population. The literature on patient-reported outcome measures used in paediatric otolaryngology was reviewed.Methods:A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the databases Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycInfo, using the terms: ‘health assessment questionnaire’, ‘structured questionnaire’, ‘questionnaire’, ‘patient reported outcome measures’, ‘PROM’, ‘quality of life’ or ‘survey’, and ‘children’ or ‘otolaryngology’. The search was limited to English-language articles published between 1996 and 2016.Results:The search yielded 656 articles, of which 63 were considered relevant. This included general paediatric patient-reported outcome measures applied to otolaryngology, and paediatric otolaryngology disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures.Conclusion:A large collection of patient-reported outcome measures are described in the paediatric otolaryngology literature. Greater standardisation of the patient-reported outcome measures used in paediatric otolaryngology would assist in pooling of data and increase the validation of tools used.

Download Full-text