scholarly journals Reliability of digital rectal examination as compared to anal manometry in chronic anal fissure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
D'Orazio Beatrice ◽  
Di Vita Gaetano ◽  
Calì Dario ◽  
Geraci Girolamo
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Anal Manometry ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Rectal Examination

Digital Rectal Examination of Sphincter Pressures in Chronic Anal Fissure Is Unreliable

2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver M. Jones ◽  
Thanesan Ramalingam ◽  
Ian Lindsey ◽  
Chris Cunningham ◽  
Bruce D. George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Rectal Examination

scholarly journals The Chronic Anal Fissure Treatment by Internal Partial Lateral Sphincterotomy and Following Anal Manometry

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Dušan Šimkovič ◽  
Milan Široký ◽  
Karel Šmejkal
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Anorectal Manometry ◽  
Anal Manometry ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Lateral Sphincterotomy ◽  
Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
The People ◽  
Pathologic Findings ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Careful History

Anal fissure remains one of the most common proctologic problems. A number of reports have advocated the use of partial internal sphincterotomy as a treatment of chronic anal fissure. Our study shows the results of a retrospective analysis of our patients who underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. To determine long time results we examined random sample of 75 operated patients. Apart from taking careful history and patientÕs assessment of the operation effect, the patients were investigated ãper rectumÒ, and even possibly rectoscopically. To asscertain suitability and also security of properly done internal sphincterotomy, we performed anorectal manometric examinations in 53 patients controlled. To conclude our results, we can state that in 9 (12%) patients controlled some subjective complaints or certain pathologic findings connected with anal fissure or sphincterotomy were found. None of the people from the set of ours suffered from any complaints, which can be taken as stool incontinency. In no patients any change in pressure measured by anorectal manometry indicating incontinency was proved.

Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Patients with Chronic Anal Fissure

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 292
Author(s):  
Jung Soo Park ◽  
Jae Bum Lee ◽  
Tae Sun Kim ◽  
Hang Jun Cho ◽  
Do Sun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Internal Sphincterotomy

scholarly journals Clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer using digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson C. Okpua ◽  
Simon I. Okekpa ◽  
Stanley Njaka ◽  
Augusta N. Emeh
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Test ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Antigen Tests

Abstract Background Being diagnosed with cancer, irrespective of type initiates a serious psychological concern. The increasing rate of detection of indolent prostate cancers is a source of worry to public health. Digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests are the commonly used prostate cancer screening tests. Understanding the diagnostic accuracies of these tests may provide clearer pictures of their characteristics and values in prostate cancer diagnosis. This review compared the sensitivities and specificities of digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen test in detection of clinically important prostate cancers using studies from wider population. Main body We conducted literature search in PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, Wiley Online, CINAHL, Scopus, AJOL and Google Scholar, using key words and Boolean operators. Studies comparing the sensitivity and specificity of digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests in men 40 years and above, using biopsy as reference standard were retrieved. Data were extracted and analysed using Review manager (RevMan 5.3) statistical software. The overall quality of the studies was good, and heterogeneity was observed across the studies. The result comparatively shows that prostate-specific antigen test has higher sensitivity (P < 0.00001, RR 0.74, CI 0.67–0.83) and specificity (P < 0.00001, RR 1.81, CI 1.54–2.12) in the detection of prostate cancers than digital rectal examination. Conclusion Prostate-specific antigen test has higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting prostate cancers from men of multiple ethnic origins. However, combination of prostate-specific antigen test and standardized digital rectal examination procedure, along with patients history, may improve the accuracy and minimize over-diagnoses of indolent prostate cancers.

scholarly journals The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 855
Author(s):  
Omar Farooq ◽  
Ameer Farooq ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Raza Qadri ◽  
Tanner Steed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Patient Questionnaire ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Rectal Cancers

Background: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is considered an important part of the physical examination. However, it is unclear how many patients have a DRE performed at the primary care level in the work-up of rectal cancer, and if the absence of a DRE causes a delay to consultation with a specialist. Methods: A retrospective patient questionnaire was sent to 1000 consecutive patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer. The questionnaire asked patients to recall if they had a DRE performed by their general practitioner (GP) when they first presented with symptoms or a positive FIT test. Demographic data, staging data, and time to consultation with a specialist were also collected. Results: A thousand surveys were mailed out, and a total of 262 patients responded. Of the respondents, 46.2% did not recall undergoing a digital rectal examination by their primary care provider. Women were less likely to undergo a DRE than men (28.6% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.019). While there was a trend towards longer times to specialist consultation in patients who did not undergo a DRE (27.0 vs. 12.2 weeks), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.121). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients who are FIT positive or have symptomatic rectal bleeding do not recall having a DRE by their primary care provider. Barriers may include lack of comfort with performing DRE or lack of time. Clearer guidelines and more support for GP’s may increase uptake of DRE.

scholarly journals Less is more—the best test for anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer patients prior to ileostomy reversal

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Lindner ◽  
Steffen Eitelbuss ◽  
Svetlana Hetjens ◽  
Joshua Gawlitza ◽  
Julia Hardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Colorectal Anastomosis ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Contrast Enema ◽  
Paired Data ◽  
Endoscopic Procedures ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Ileostomy Reversal

Abstract Purpose No clear consensus exists on how to routinely assess the integrity of the colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of contrast enema, endoscopic procedures, and digital rectal examination in rectal cancer patients in this setting. Methods A systematic literature search was performed. Studies assessing at least one index test for which a 2 × 2 table was calculable were included. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated and used for test comparison. Paired data were used where parameters could not be calculated. Methodological quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Results Two prospective and 11 retrospective studies comprising 1903 patients were eligible for inclusion. Paired data analysis showed equal or better results for sensitivity and specificity of both endoscopic procedures and digital rectal examination compared to contrast enema. Subgroup analysis of contrast enema according to methodological quality revealed that studies with higher methodological quality reported poorer sensitivity for equal specificity and vice versa. No case was described where a contrast enema revealed an anastomotic leak that was overseen in digital rectal examination or endoscopic procedures. Conclusions Endoscopy and digital rectal examination appear to be the best diagnostic tests to assess the integrity of the colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal. Accuracy measures of contrast enema are overestimated by studies with lower methodological quality. Synopsis of existing evidence and risk–benefit considerations justifies omission of contrast enema in favor of endoscopic and clinical assessment. Trial registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019107771

Calibrated lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Rosa ◽  
P. Lolli ◽  
D. Piccinelli ◽  
F. Mazzola ◽  
C. Zugni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
Internal Sphincterotomy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document