Cardiovascular risk factor control and outcomes in peripheral artery disease patients in the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry

2009 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. e86-e92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrice P. Cacoub ◽  
Maria Teresa B. Abola ◽  
Iris Baumgartner ◽  
Deepak L. Bhatt ◽  
Mark A. Creager ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
pp. 219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Christiansen ◽  
Jesper Møller Jensen ◽  
Anders Brondberg ◽  
Hans Erik Bøtker ◽  
Henrik Jensen

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Vallejo-Vaz ◽  
K I Dharmayat ◽  
N Nzeakor ◽  
S T Fatoba ◽  
P McMahon ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Greater recognition of a multi-factorial approach to risk factor control and use of guideline-recommended evidence-based therapies, including antiplatelets, have led to a decline in recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events among those with atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). While residual risk still persists, recent evidence-based therapies have emerged which could further attenuate CV risk in these individuals, including novel drugs adjunct to antiplatelet therapies. Purpose The RESRISK study aims to quantify the residual atherothrombotic risk among a routine care cohort with ASCVD on guideline-recommended antiplatelet monotherapy (APMT). As a first step, we assessed the characteristics of participants at entry in the study, including risk factor burden, comorbidities and use of evidence-based medications. Methods A retrospective (2010–18) cohort of 758,325 patients with coronary (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) aged ≥18 years was derived from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients were selected if they were on recommended APMT according to ESC guidelines and NICE (aspirin for CAD; clopidogrel for PAD), were diagnosed with CAD/PAD prior to initiating APMT, and had ≥1 year of baseline data prior to index date (date of first APMT prescription). History of atrial fibrillation and haemorrhagic stroke led to exclusion. Results 174,210 patients with CAD (and no prior history of PAD) and 11,050 patients with PAD (and no prior history of CAD) met the inclusion criteria. Within the selection process for the PAD cohort, 51,114 patients were excluded due to being prescribed aspirin instead of clopidogrel. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table. Mean age was ∼70 years for both cohorts. While prevalence of hypertension was similar in both cohorts, presence of diabetes was 1.6 times higher in PAD patients. Stroke was 2.5 times more prevalent among PAD patients. The proportion of patients with systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≤130/≤85 mmHg were 41.6%/84.5% for CAD and 32.2%/80.6% for PAD (corresponding numbers for ≤140/≤90 mmHg were 67.8%/93.4% for CAD, and 58.8%/91.1% for PAD). Mean LDL-C was 2.4±0.9 and 2.6±1.1 mmol/L in CAD and PAD patients, with 10.7% and 9.5% of them, respectively, having an LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L (25.1% and 22.6% for LDL-C <1.8). Conclusions Among a contemporary cohort with ASCVD on guideline-recommended APMT, risk factor burden is high and attainment of guideline-recommended targets remains largely suboptimal. Prevalence of diabetes among PAD patients is particularly high. A large gap exists between guideline recommendations and guideline-recommended goal attainment. Greater attention to risk factor control and use of appropriate evidence-based therapy is required to reduce the potential risk of recurrent events among this high-risk population. Subsequent follow-up analysis with linkage to outcomes will provide quantification of the consequences of current practice on residual risk. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): All financial support for this research has been provided by Bayer plc. Table 1


2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 765-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Bittner ◽  
Marnie Bertolet ◽  
Rafael Barraza Felix ◽  
Michael E. Farkouh ◽  
Suzanne Goldberg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Vanassche ◽  
Peter Verhamme ◽  
Sonia S Anand ◽  
Olga Shestakovska ◽  
Keith AA Fox ◽  
...  

Aims Secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease involves antithrombotic therapy and optimal control of cardiovascular risk factors. In the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) study, adding low-dose rivaroxaban on top of aspirin lowered cardiovascular events, but there is limited data about risk factor control in secondary prevention. We studied the association between risk factor status and outcomes, and the impact of risk factor status on the treatment effect of rivaroxaban, in a large contemporary population of patients with coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease. Methods and results We reported ischemic events (cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction) in participants from the randomized, double-blind COMPASS study by individual risk factor (blood pressure, smoking status, cholesterol level, presence of diabetes, body mass index, and level of physical activity), and by number of risk factors. We compared rates and hazard ratios of patients treated with rivaroxaban plus aspirin vs aspirin alone within each risk factor category and tested for interaction between risk factor status and antithrombotic regimen. Complete baseline risk factor status was available in 27,117 (99%) patients. Status and number of risk factors were both associated with increased risk of ischemic events. Rates of ischemic events (hazard ratio 2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.8–2.6) and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 2.0; 1.5–2.7) were more than twofold higher in patients with 4–6 compared with 0–1 risk factors ( p < 0.0001 for both). Rivaroxaban reduced event rates independently of the number of risk factors ( p interaction 0.93), with the largest absolute benefit in patients with the highest number of risk factors. Conclusion More favorable risk factor status and low-dose rivaroxaban were independently associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document