scholarly journals Effectiveness of adherence to lipid lowering therapy on LDL-cholesterol in patients with very high cardiovascular risk: A real-world evidence study in primary care

2017 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Guglielmi ◽  
Alfonso Bellia ◽  
Serena Pecchioli ◽  
David Della-Morte ◽  
Damiano Parretti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Real World ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Very High

scholarly journals Possibilities of combination lipid-lowering therapy in a patient with very high cardiovascular risk (сlinical case)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-73
Author(s):  
Daria Yu. Sedykh ◽  
◽  
Natalia V. Fedorova ◽  
Vasily V. Kashtalap ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lipid Metabolism Disorders ◽  
Very High

The article demonstrates the possibility of prescribing an effective and safe lipid-lowering combination of the most tolerated doses of statins in combination with ezetimibe, using the example of a patient with severe lipid metabolism disorders in the post-infarction period. It has been shown that in real clinical practice, patients with acute coronary syndrome and persisting high LDL values are quite common, despite of the prescription of statins. These patients need closer follow-up and wider use of combined lipid-lowering therapy by adding ezetimibe to maximally tolerated doses of statins. Current clinical guidelines allow this to be done when patients fail to achieve target LDL values (>1.4 mmol/L) with statins monotherapy. This approach is effective and safe, which is illustrated by this hereditary clinical case. In routine clinical practice mandatory lipids control is required 4–6 weeks after patient’s discharge from the hospital for acute coronary syndrome. If the target lipids values were not achieved with the maximum dosage of statins, a mandatory using the combination therapy with ezetimibe is required. Keywords: myocardial infarction, dyslipidemia, improved prognosis, statins, ezetimibe For citation: Sedykh DYu, Fedorova NV, Kashtalap VV. Possibilities of combination lipid-lowering therapy in a patient with very high cardiovascular risk (сlinical case). Consilium Medicum. 2021; 23 (1): 70–73. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2021.1.200604

scholarly journals Cardiovascular risk and response to lipid lowering therapy in patients with HIV infection according to different recommendations

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0244675
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Pawlos ◽  
Marlena Broncel ◽  
Ewelina Wlazłowska ◽  
Elżbieta Jabłonowska ◽  
Paulina Gorzelak-Pabiś
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Hiv Patients ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Very High

Background HIV patients are at increased cardiovascular risk while available European cardiovascular recommendations are ambiguous. Methods Retrospective analysis of 389 HIV-patients was conducted. Cardiovascular risk was determined by D:A:D, Framingham and SCORE scales. Patients were divided into risk groups as recommended by EACS 2019, PTN AIDS 2019 and ESC/EAS 2019 Guidelines and hypolipemic treatment was evaluated. Results In total, 389 HIV-positive patients took part in the study, most of whom were men (n = 312, 80.4%), mean age 41.69±10years. Mean lipid levels among all HIV patients: Tch:177.2±36mg/dl, HDL:48.9±18mg/dl, LDL:103.8±31mg/dl, TG:143.3±81mg/dl, AIP:0.45±0.3, non-HDL:129.2±36 mg/dl. Most of the participants (n = 360, 92.5%) were assigned to the high cardiovascular risk group according to ESC/EAS and PTN AIDS guidelines. The achievement of therapeutic LDLs according to ESC/EAS was 10.3% for those at very high cardiovascular risk (8.7% on lipid lowering treatment vs. 16.7% without hypolipemic drugs) and 12.0% (5.8% treated vs. 13.6% untreated) at high cardiovascular risk; according to PTN AIDS,17.2% achievement was noted by the very high-risk group (13% treated vs. 33.3% untreated), and 45.9% for the high-risk group (37.7% treated vs. 48.0% untreated); according to EACS Guidelines, 2.5% achievement in secondary prevention (3.8% treatedvs. 0% untreated) and 24.7% in primary prevention (22.2% treated vs. 26.1% untreated). Mean doses of statins were 8.75mg±6mg (Rosuvastatin) and 22.35±19mg (Atorvastatin). Conclusions The achievement of therapeutic LDLs by all recommendations is unsatisfactory, and generally worse in patients on lipid lowering therapy. Hypolipemic treatment of our HIV patients is based on low doses of statins, even in secondary prevention.

scholarly journals Integrated solution for very high cardiovascular risk patients. Rationale and design of a pilot study

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 4608
Author(s):  
E. I. Pavlyuk ◽  
M. V. Ionov ◽  
A. S. Alieva ◽  
N. G. Avdonina ◽  
A. N. Yakovlev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Myocardial Revascularization ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Target Values ◽  
Very High

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cardiovascular disease and the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as an abrupt destabilization of CAD, multiplies the risk of cardiovascular events. To reduce the incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events, timely tackling potentially reversible risk factors such as hypertension and/or hyperglycemia is imperative. However, a solid basis for a secondary prevention lies in the treatment of dyslipidemia and begins in the first hours of hospital admission. Despite considerable evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering therapy, averagely only one third of patients maintain control of lipids. The main challenges are low adherence, poor continuity of medical care, and the lack of an ambulatory routine follow-up. Telehealth solutions are believed to address these barriers and may be considered as an add-on to in-person patient care. Telemonitoring of vital and laboratory parameters, remote patient counseling can be introduced into routine care delivery. Telemedicine shows promise for fostering better clinical effect, and provides health-related quality of life improvement.It is planned to conduct a pilot observational study aimed to create and to test an integrated solution, i.e. telemonitoring and remote counseling in patients of very high cardiovascular risk with ACS followed by myocardial revascularization. The goal is to determine the clinical effectiveness, i.e achievement of target values of blood pressure, lipid profile and glycemia, and patient-centeredness of this approach.

scholarly journals Control of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease in Real-Life Practice: The DAUSSET Study in French Cardiologists

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5938
Author(s):  
Jean Ferrières ◽  
François Roubille ◽  
Michel Farnier ◽  
Patrick Jourdain ◽  
Denis Angoulvant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cholesterol Goal ◽  
Very High

Introduction: Patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) are at very high risk for cardiovascular events. Methods: The DAUSSET study is a national, multicenter, non-interventional study that included very high-risk CAD patients followed by French cardiologists. It aimed to describe real-life clinical practices for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol control in the secondary prevention of CAD. Results: A total of 912 patients (mean age, 65.4 years; men, 76.1%; myocardial infarction, 69.4%; first episode, 80.1%) were analyzed. The LDL cholesterol goal was 70 mg/dL in most cases (84.9%). The LDL cholesterol goal <70 mg/dL was achieved in 41.7% of patients. Of the 894 (98.0%) patients who received lipid-lowering therapy, 81.2% had been treated more intensively after the cardiac event, 27.0% had been treated less intensively and 13.1% had been maintained. Participating cardiologists were very satisfied or satisfied with treatment response in 72.6% of patients. Moderate satisfaction or dissatisfaction with lipid-lowering therapy was related to not achieving objectives (100%), treatment inefficacy (53.7%), treatment intolerance (23.4%) and poor adherence (12.3%). Conclusion: These real-world results show that lipid control in very high-risk patients remains insufficient. More than half of the patients did not achieve the LDL cholesterol goal. Prevention of cardiovascular events in these very high-risk patients could be further improved by better education and more intensive lipid-lowering therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document