Additional insight into gender-related differences in comorbid conditions among patients with acute coronary syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. e192
Author(s):  
T. Lunova ◽  
R. Komorovsky
2011 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Sanchis ◽  
Julio Núñez ◽  
Vicente Bodí ◽  
Eduardo Núñez ◽  
Ana García-Alvarez ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e855
Author(s):  
T Kvantaliani ◽  
N Pargalava ◽  
P Tsiklauri

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2047
Author(s):  
Mina Karami ◽  
Elma Peters ◽  
Wim Lagrand ◽  
Saskia Houterman ◽  
Corstiaan den Uil ◽  
...  

It is important to gain more insight into the cardiogenic shock (CS) population, as currently, little is known on how to improve outcomes. Therefore, we assessed clinical outcome in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with and without CS at admission. Furthermore, the incidence of CS and predictors for mortality in CS patients were evaluated. The Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR) is a nationwide registry on all cardiac interventions. We used NHR data of ACS patients treated with PCI between 2015 and 2019. Among 75,407 ACS patients treated with PCI, 3028 patients (4.1%) were identified with CS, respectively 4.3%, 3.9%, 3.5%, and 4.3% per year. Factors associated with mortality in CS were age (HR 1.02, 95%CI 1.02–1.03), eGFR (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.98–0.99), diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.08–1.45), multivessel disease (HR 1.22, 95%CI 1.06–1.39), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.06–1.45), and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.50–1.94). In conclusion, in this Dutch nationwide registry-based study of ACS patients treated by PCI, the incidence of CS was 4.1% over the 4-year study period. Predictors for mortality in CS were higher age, renal insufficiency, presence of DM, multivessel disease, prior MI, and OHCA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 3265-3275
Author(s):  
Heather L. Ramsdell-Hudock ◽  
Anne S. Warlaumont ◽  
Lindsey E. Foss ◽  
Candice Perry

Purpose To better enable communication among researchers, clinicians, and caregivers, we aimed to assess how untrained listeners classify early infant vocalization types in comparison to terms currently used by researchers and clinicians. Method Listeners were caregivers with no prior formal education in speech and language development. A 1st group of listeners reported on clinician/researcher-classified vowel, squeal, growl, raspberry, whisper, laugh, and cry vocalizations obtained from archived video/audio recordings of 10 infants from 4 through 12 months of age. A list of commonly used terms was generated based on listener responses and the standard research terminology. A 2nd group of listeners was presented with the same vocalizations and asked to select terms from the list that they thought best described the sounds. Results Classifications of the vocalizations by listeners largely overlapped with published categorical descriptors and yielded additional insight into alternate terms commonly used. The biggest discrepancies were found for the vowel category. Conclusion Prior research has shown that caregivers are accurate in identifying canonical babbling, a major prelinguistic vocalization milestone occurring at about 6–7 months of age. This indicates that caregivers are also well attuned to even earlier emerging vocalization types. This supports the value of continuing basic and clinical research on the vocal types infants produce in the 1st months of life and on their potential diagnostic utility, and may also help improve communication between speech-language pathologists and families.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 121-122
Author(s):  
Mukhyaprana Prabhu ◽  
Shyny Reddy ◽  
Ranjan Shetty ◽  
V.B. Mohan ◽  
Weena Stanley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document