Long-term changes in calcareous grassland vegetation in North-western Germany – No decline in species richness, but a shift in species composition

2014 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 170-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Diekmann ◽  
Ute Jandt ◽  
Didier Alard ◽  
Albert Bleeker ◽  
Emmanuel Corcket ◽  
...  
Plant Ecology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 221 (5) ◽  
pp. 377-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy E. Ridding ◽  
James M. Bullock ◽  
Oliver L. Pescott ◽  
Peter Hawes ◽  
Robin Walls ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2170
Author(s):  
Elzbieta Dumnicka ◽  
Tanja Pipan ◽  
David Culver

Caves are the best studied aquatic subterranean habitat, but there is a wide variety of these habitats, ranging in depth below the surface and size of the spaces (pore or habitat size). Both factors are important in setting limits to species composition and richness. In addition to caves, among the most important shallow aquatic subterranean habitats are the hyporheal (underflow of rivers and streams), the hypotelminorheal (very superficial drainages with water exiting in seeps), epikarst, and calcrete aquifers. Although it is little studied, both body size and species composition in the different habitats is different. Because of high levels of endemism and difficulty in access, no subterranean habitats are well sampled, even caves. However, there are enough data for robust generalizations about some geographic patterns. Individual hotspot caves are concentrated in the Dinaric region of southern Europe, and overall, tropical regions have fewer obligate aquatic cave dwellers (stygobionts). In all subterranean aquatic habitats, regional diversity is much higher than local diversity, but local diversity (especially single cave diversity) may be a useful predictor of regional species richness. In Europe there is a ridge of high aquatic subterranean species richness basically extending east from the French–Spanish border. Its cause may be either high productivity or that long-term temperature oscillations are at a minimum. With increased collecting and analysis, global and continental trends should become clearer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 181 ◽  
pp. 284-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Meyer ◽  
Ingrid Kröncke ◽  
Alexander Bartholomä ◽  
Joachim W. Dippner ◽  
Ulrike Schückel

Weed Research ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 457-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Keller ◽  
N Böhringer ◽  
J Möhring ◽  
V Rueda-Ayala ◽  
C Gutjahr ◽  
...  

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1218
Author(s):  
Katarína Mikulová ◽  
Ivan Jarolímek ◽  
Jozef Šibík ◽  
Tomáš Bacigál ◽  
Mária Šibíková

Objectives: We followed the long-term changes of softwood floodplain forests strongly altered by water regime changes and examine the behaviour of neophytes in this environment. Here we ask: (1) How did the composition of neophyte and native species change? (2) How did the presence of species that prefer wetter conditions change? (3) What traditionally distinguished type of softwood floodplain forests (a wetter one or a more mesophilous one) do neophytes prefer? (4) What environmental factors affect the native species richness and the occurrence and cover of neophytes? Materials and Methods: Historical and recent phytosociological relevés of the association Salicetum albae of the Slovak part of the inland delta of the Danube River were used (177 plots together). For each plot, the number and cover of neophytes and number of native species were measured, and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index, the stand structure (cover of tree, shrub and herb layer) and the mean of Ellenberg indicator values were calculated and compared among time periods. Temporal trends of the soil moisture characterized by indicator values calculated for each plot were determined using a Linear Model. The synoptic table of traditional vegetation types was done to show preferences of neophytes for particular softwood forest types. The effect of site conditions on native species richness and occurrence of neophytes was determined using the Generalized Linear Model. Results: The relative number and cover of neophyte species increased and the absolute number of native species decreased over time; the vegetation of the area has changed from variable hygrophilous and mesophilous to homogenised mesophilous; most non-native species prefer the mesophilous vegetation of the floodplain forests; the wetter parts of the floodplain more successfully resisted invasions. Conclusions: The vegetation of the researched area has considerably changed over time to become less diverse and less hygrophilous, and has more invasive species. To preserve floodplain forests, natural hydrological and connectivity patterns should be adequately protected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document