The Development and Internal Evaluation of a Predictive Model to Identify for Whom Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Offers Superior Relapse Prevention for Recurrent Depression Versus Maintenance Antidepressant Medication

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. S36-S37
Author(s):  
Zachary Cohen ◽  
Robert DeRubeis ◽  
Rachel Hayes ◽  
Edward Watkins ◽  
Glyn Lewis ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Schweizer ◽  
Zachary Daniel Cohen ◽  
Robert DeRubeis ◽  
Rachel Hayes ◽  
Edward R Watkins ◽  
...  

Major depressive disorder is highly recurrent over the lifespan, even following successful pharmacological and/or psychological intervention. Here we investigate whether predictive modeling can be used to optimize treatment recommendations, when choosing between continuing maintenance antidepressant medication (mADM) treatment or switching to Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy and tapering their ADM (MBCT) as preventive interventions for recurrent depression. Using data (N=424) from the PREVENT trial (Kuyken et al, 2015), we applied elastic net regularized regression for variable selection and built models for predicting relapse over 24-month follow-up in the mADM and MBCT groups compared in the trial. Only the mADM model, including a combination of demographic, clinical and psychological factors, showed better predictive utility than chance. Individuals who were predicted to have a poor prognosis if staying on mADM had a predicted 40% lower risk of relapse across the follow-up period if switching to MBCT. For those with moderate-to-good mADM prognosis, both treatments offered comparable predicted risk. The results suggest that predictive modeling has the potential to guide therapeutic choice around relapse prevention in clinical settings.


2016 ◽  
Vol 208 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marloes J. Huijbers ◽  
Philip Spinhoven ◽  
Jan Spijker ◽  
Henricus G. Ruhé ◽  
Digna J. F. van Schaik ◽  
...  

BackgroundMindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and maintenance antidepressant medication (mADM) both reduce the risk of relapse in recurrent depression, but their combination has not been studied.AimsTo investigate whether MBCT with discontinuation of mADM is non-inferior to MBCT+mADM.MethodA multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00928980). Adults with recurrent depression in remission, using mADM for 6 months or longer (n = 249), were randomly allocated to either discontinue (n = 128) or continue (n = 121) mADM after MBCT. The primary outcome was depressive relapse/recurrence within 15 months. A confidence interval approach with a margin of 25% was used to test non-inferiority. Key secondary outcomes were time to relapse/recurrence and depression severity.ResultsThe difference in relapse/recurrence rates exceeded the non-inferiority margin and time to relapse/recurrence was significantly shorter after discontinuation of mADM. There were only minor differences in depression severity.ConclusionsOur findings suggest an increased risk of relapse/recurrence in patients withdrawing from mADM after MBCT.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rozemarijn S. van Kleef ◽  
Claudi L. H. Bockting ◽  
Evelien van Valen ◽  
André Aleman ◽  
Jan-Bernard C. Marsman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a psychiatric disorder with a highly recurrent character, making prevention of relapse an important clinical goal. Preventive Cognitive Therapy (PCT) has been proven effective in preventing relapse, though not for every patient. A better understanding of relapse vulnerability and working mechanisms of preventive treatment may inform effective personalized intervention strategies. Neurocognitive models of MDD suggest that abnormalities in prefrontal control over limbic emotion-processing areas during emotional processing and regulation are important in understanding relapse vulnerability. Whether changes in these neurocognitive abnormalities are induced by PCT and thus play an important role in mediating the risk for recurrent depression, is currently unclear. In the Neurocognitive Working Mechanisms of the Prevention of Relapse In Depression (NEWPRIDE) study, we aim to 1) study neurocognitive factors underpinning the vulnerability for relapse, 2) understand the neurocognitive working mechanisms of PCT, 3) predict longitudinal treatment effects based on pre-treatment neurocognitive characteristics, and 4) validate the pupil dilation response as a marker for prefrontal activity, reflecting emotion regulation capacity and therapy success. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 75 remitted recurrent MDD (rrMDD) patients will be included. Detailed clinical and cognitive measurements, fMRI scanning and pupillometry will be performed at baseline and three-month follow-up. In the interval, 50 rrMDD patients will be randomized to eight sessions of PCT and 25 rrMDD patients to a waiting list. At baseline, 25 healthy control participants will be additionally included to objectify cross-sectional residual neurocognitive abnormalities in rrMDD. After 18 months, clinical assessments of relapse status are performed to investigate which therapy induced changes predict relapse in the 50 patients allocated to PCT. Discussion The present trial is the first to study the neurocognitive vulnerability factors underlying relapse and mediating relapse prevention, their value for predicting PCT success and whether pupil dilation acts as a valuable marker in this regard. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of relapse prevention could contribute to the development of better targeted preventive interventions. Trial registration Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register, August 18, 2015, trial number NL5219.


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Allen ◽  
Andrew Bromley ◽  
Willem Kuyken ◽  
Stefanie J. Sonnenberg

Background: Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) is a promising approach to help people who suffer recurrent depression prevent depressive relapse. However, little is known about how MBCT works. Moreover, participants' subjective experiences of MBCT as a relapse prevention treatment remain largely unstudied. Aim: This study examines participants' representations of their experience of MBCT and its value as a relapse-prevention program for recurrent depression. Method: Twenty people who had participated in MBCT classes for recurrent depression within a primary care setting were interviewed 12 months after treatment. The focus of the interview was on participants' reflections on what they found helpful, meaningful and difficult about MBCT as a relapse prevention program. Thematic analysis was used to identify the key patterns and elements in participants' accounts. Results and conclusions: Four overarching themes were extracted: control, acceptance, relationships and struggle. The theoretical, clinical and research implications are discussed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 206 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay C. Fournier ◽  
Robert J. DeRubeis ◽  
Jay Amsterdam ◽  
Richard C. Shelton ◽  
Steven D. Hollon

BackgroundDepression can adversely affect employment status.AimsTo examine whether there is a relative advantage of cognitive therapy or antidepressant medication in improving employment status following treatment, using data from a previously reported trial.MethodRandom assignment to cognitive therapy (n = 48) or the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine (n = 93) for 4 months; treatment responders were followed for up to 24 months. Differential effects of treatment on employment status were examined.ResultsAt the end of 28 months, cognitive therapy led to higher rates of full-time employment (88.9%) than did antidepressant medication among treatment responders (70.8%), χ21 = 5.78, P = 0.02, odds ratio (OR) = 5.66, 95% CI 1.16–27.69. In the shorter-term, the main effect of treatment on employment status was not significant following acute treatment (χ21 = 1.74, P = 0.19, OR = 1.77, 95% CI 0.75–4.17); however, we observed a site×treatment interaction (χ21 = 6.87, P = 0.009) whereby cognitive therapy led to a higher rate of full-time employment at one site but not at the other.ConclusionsCognitive therapy may produce greater improvements in employment v. medication, particularly over the longer term.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document