scholarly journals Quantitative Assessment of Thermodynamic Constraints on the Solution Space of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models

2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 512-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua J. Hamilton ◽  
Vivek Dwivedi ◽  
Jennifer L. Reed
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikash Pandey ◽  
Daniel Hernandez Gardiol ◽  
Anush Chiappino-Pepe ◽  
Vassily Hatzimanikatis

AbstractA large number of genome-scale models of cellular metabolism are available for various organisms. These models include all known metabolic reactions based on the genome annotation. However, the reactions that are active are dependent on the cellular metabolic function or environmental condition. Constraint-based methods that integrate condition-specific transcriptomics data into models have been used extensively to investigate condition-specific metabolism. Here, we present a method (TEX-FBA) for modeling condition-specific metabolism that combines transcriptomics and reaction thermodynamics data to generate a thermodynamically-feasible condition-specific metabolic model. TEX-FBA is an extension of thermodynamic-based flux balance analysis (TFA), which allows the simultaneous integration of different stages of experimental data (e.g., absolute gene expression, metabolite concentrations, thermodynamic data, and fluxomics) and the identification of alternative metabolic states that maximize consistency between gene expression levels and condition-specific reaction fluxes. We applied TEX-FBA to a genome-scale metabolic model ofEscherichia coliby integrating available condition-specific experimental data and found a marked reduction in the flux solution space. Our analysis revealed a marked correlation between actual gene expression profile and experimental flux measurements compared to the one obtained from a randomly generated gene expression profile. We identified additional essential reactions from the membrane lipid and folate metabolism when we integrated transcriptomics data of the given condition on the top of metabolomics and thermodynamics data. These results show TEX-FBA is a promising new approach to study condition-specific metabolism when different types of experimental data are available.Author summaryCells utilize nutrients via biochemical reactions that are controlled by enzymes and synthesize required compounds for their survival and growth. Genome-scale models of metabolism representing these complex reaction networks have been reconstructed for a wide variety of organisms ranging from bacteria to human cells. These models comprise all possible biochemical reactions in a cell, but cells choose only a subset of reactions for their immediate needs and functions. Usually, these models allow for a large flux solution space and one can integrate experimental data in order to reduce it and potentially predict the physiology for a specific condition. We developed a method for integrating different types of omics data, such as fluxomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics into genome-scale metabolic models that reduces the flux solution space. Using gene expression data, the algorithm maximizes the consistency between the predicted and experimental flux for the reactions and predicts biologically relevant flux ranges for the remaining reactions in the network. This method is useful for determining fluxes of metabolic reactions with reduced uncertainty and suitable for performing context- and condition-specific analysis in metabolic models using different types of experimental data.


Metabolites ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Seyed Babak Loghmani ◽  
Nadine Veith ◽  
Sven Sahle ◽  
Frank T. Bergmann ◽  
Brett G. Olivier ◽  
...  

Genome-scale metabolic models are frequently used in computational biology. They offer an integrative view on the metabolic network of an organism without the need to know kinetic information in detail. However, the huge solution space which comes with the analysis of genome-scale models by using, e.g., Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) poses a problem, since it is hard to thoroughly investigate and often only an arbitrarily selected individual flux distribution is discussed as an outcome of FBA. Here, we introduce a new approach to inspect the solution space and we compare it with other approaches, namely Flux Variability Analysis (FVA) and CoPE-FBA, using several different genome-scale models of lactic acid bacteria. We examine the extent to which different types of experimental data limit the solution space and how the robustness of the system increases as a result. We find that our new approach to inspect the solution space is a good complementary method that offers additional insights into the variance of biological phenotypes and can help to prevent wrong conclusions in the analysis of FBA results.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Yang ◽  
Zhitao Mao ◽  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Ruoyu Wang ◽  
Peiji Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractStoichiometric genome-scale metabolic network models (GEMs) have been widely used to predict metabolic phenotypes. In addition to stoichiometric ratios, other constraints such as enzyme availability and thermodynamic feasibility can also limit the phenotype solution space. Extended GEM models considering either enzymatic or thermodynamic constraints have been shown to improve prediction accuracy. In this paper, we propose a novel method that integrates both enzymatic and thermodynamic constraints in a single Pyomo modeling framework (ETGEMs). We applied this method to construct the EcoETM, the E. coli metabolic model iML1515 with enzymatic and thermodynamic constraints. Using this model, we calculated the optimal pathways for cellular growth and the production of 22 metabolites. When comparing the results with those of iML1515 and models with one of the two constraints, we observed that many thermodynamically unfavorable and/or high enzyme cost pathways were excluded from EcoETM. For example, the synthesis pathway of carbamoyl-phosphate (Cbp) from iML1515 is both thermodynamically unfavorable and enzymatically costly. After introducing the new constraints, the production pathways and yields of several Cbp-derived products (e.g. L-arginine, orotate) calculated using EcoETM were more realistic. The results of this study demonstrate the great application potential of metabolic models with multiple constraints for pathway analysis and phenotype predication.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Zamani ◽  
Sayed-Amir Marashi ◽  
Tahmineh Lohrasebi ◽  
Mohammad-Ali Malboobi ◽  
Esmail Foroozan

Genome-scale metabolic models (GSMMs) have enabled researchers to perform systems-level studies of living organisms. As a constraint-based technique, flux balance analysis (FBA) aids computation of reaction fluxes and prediction of...


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 830-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxing Jian ◽  
Ningchuan Li ◽  
Qian Chen ◽  
Qiang Hua

Reconstruction and application of genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) have facilitated metabolic engineering by providing a platform on which systematic computational analysis of metabolic networks can be performed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Riemer ◽  
René Rex ◽  
Dietmar Schomburg

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nhung Pham ◽  
Ruben Van Heck ◽  
Jesse van Dam ◽  
Peter Schaap ◽  
Edoardo Saccenti ◽  
...  

Genome scale metabolic models (GEMs) are manually curated repositories describing the metabolic capabilities of an organism. GEMs have been successfully used in different research areas, ranging from systems medicine to biotechnology. However, the different naming conventions (namespaces) of databases used to build GEMs limit model reusability and prevent the integration of existing models. This problem is known in the GEM community but its extent has not been analyzed in depth. In this study, we investigate the name ambiguity and the multiplicity of non-systematic identifiers and we highlight the (in)consistency in their use in eleven biochemical databases of biochemical reactions and the problems that arise when mapping between different namespaces and databases. We found that such inconsistencies can be as high as 83.1%, thus emphasizing the need for strategies to deal with these issues. Currently, manual verification of the mappings appears to be the only solution to remove inconsistencies when combining models. Finally, we discuss several possible approaches to facilitate (future) unambiguous mapping.


Microbiome ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kees C. H. van der Ark ◽  
Ruben G. A. van Heck ◽  
Vitor A. P. Martins Dos Santos ◽  
Clara Belzer ◽  
Willem M. de Vos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document