Obstetric anaesthesia in low-resource settings

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Dyer ◽  
Anthony R. Reed ◽  
Michael F. James
2020 ◽  
pp. 157-196
Author(s):  
Rachel Collis ◽  
Rebecca Jones ◽  
Sarah O’Neill

In low-resource settings, obstetrics and gynaecology frequently forms a large part of the anaesthetist’s workload. The chapter serves both as an aide-memoire for those who are not regular practitioners in obstetric anaesthesia and as a guide to adapting your practice in low-resource settings. It contains practical advice on analgesia in labour and anaesthesia for Caesarean section, including spinal, general anaesthesia, and local anaesthesia techniques. It contains advice on drug alternatives in the absence of commonly used obstetric drugs, e.g. spinal bupivacaine. There are also sections on management of pre-eclampsia and obstetric haemorrhage, both of which are commonly encountered in low-resource settings. Neonatal resuscitation and non-obstetric surgery in the pregnant patient are also covered.


2016 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 079-083
Author(s):  
Lawrence Mbuagbaw ◽  
Francisca Monebenimp ◽  
Bolaji Obadeyi ◽  
Grace Bissohong ◽  
Marie-Thérèse Obama ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afework Kassu ◽  
Getnet Yimer ◽  
Solomon Benor ◽  
Kassahun Tesfaye ◽  
Yifokre Tefera ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Bingham ◽  
Amynah Janmohamed ◽  
Rosario Bartolini ◽  
Hilary M. Creed-Kanashiro ◽  
Yanuar Ruhweza Katahoire ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Victoria Abou-Khalil ◽  
Samar Helou ◽  
Eliane Khalifé ◽  
MeiRong Alice Chen ◽  
Rwitajit Majumdar ◽  
...  

We aim to identify the engagement strategies that higher education students, engaging in emergency online learning in low-resource settings, perceive to be effective. We conducted a sequential mixed-methods study based on Moore’s interaction framework for distance education. We administered a questionnaire to 313 students engaging in emergency online learning in low-resource settings to examine their perceptions of different engagement strategies. Our results showed that student–content engagement strategies, e.g., screen sharing, summaries, and class recordings, are perceived as the most effective, closely followed by student–teacher strategies, e.g., Q and A sessions and reminders. Student–student strategies, e.g., group chat and collaborative work, are perceived as the least effective. The perceived effectiveness of engagement strategies varies based on the students’ gender and technology access. To support instructors, instructional designers, and researchers, we propose a 10-level guide for engaging students during emergency online classes in low-resource settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document