Lasting Alterations of In-Vitro Oscillatory Activity by Weak Direct Current Stimulation

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e8
Author(s):  
Davide Reato ◽  
Marom Bikson ◽  
Lucas C. Parra
2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 1334-1341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Reato ◽  
Marom Bikson ◽  
Lucas C. Parra

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is emerging as a versatile tool to affect brain function. While the acute neurophysiological effects of stimulation are well understood, little is know about the long-term effects. One hypothesis is that stimulation modulates ongoing neural activity, which then translates into lasting effects via physiological plasticity. Here we used carbachol-induced gamma oscillations in hippocampal rat slices to establish whether prolonged constant current stimulation has a lasting effect on endogenous neural activity. During 10 min of stimulation, the power and frequency of gamma oscillations, as well as multiunit activity, were modulated in a polarity specific manner. Remarkably, the effects on power and multiunit activity persisted for more than 10 min after stimulation terminated. Using a computational model we propose that altered synaptic efficacy in excitatory and inhibitory pathways could be the source of these lasting effects. Future experimental studies using this novel in vitro preparation may be able to confirm or refute the proposed hypothesis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (7) ◽  
pp. 1881-1889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anatoli Y. Kabakov ◽  
Paul A. Muller ◽  
Alvaro Pascual-Leone ◽  
Frances E. Jensen ◽  
Alexander Rotenberg

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a method for modulating cortical excitability by weak constant electrical current that is applied through scalp electrodes. Although often described in terms of anodal or cathodal stimulation, depending on which scalp electrode pole is proximal to the cortical region of interest, it is the orientation of neuronal structures relative to the direct current (DC) vector that determines the effect of tDCS. To investigate the contribution of neural pathway orientation, we studied DCS-mediated neuromodulation in an in vitro rat hippocampal slice preparation. We examined the contribution of dendritic orientation to the direct current stimulation (DCS) neuromodulatory effect by recording field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) in apical and basal dendrites of CA1 neurons within a constant DC field. In addition, we assessed the contribution of axonal orientation by recording CA1 and CA3 apical fEPSPs generated by stimulation of oppositely oriented Schaffer collateral and mossy fiber axons, respectively, during DCS. Finally, nonsynaptic excitatory signal propagation was measured along antidromically stimulated CA1 axons at different DCS amplitudes and polarity. We find that modulation of both the fEPSP and population spike depends on axonal orientation relative to the electric field vector. Axonal orientation determines whether the DC field is excitatory or inhibitory and dendritic orientation affects the magnitude, but not the overall direction, of the DC effect. These data suggest that tDCS may oppositely affect neurons in a stimulated cortical volume if these neurons are excited by oppositely orientated axons in a constant electrical field.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 199-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Addie Hicks ◽  
Alyssa Panitch ◽  
Michael Caplan ◽  
James D. Sweeney

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Kronberg ◽  
Asif Rahman ◽  
Mahima Sharma ◽  
Marom Bikson ◽  
Lucas C. Parra

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gessica Sala ◽  
Tommaso Bocci ◽  
Valentina Borzì ◽  
Marta Parazzini ◽  
Alberto Priori ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3583
Author(s):  
Nadine Euskirchen ◽  
Michael A. Nitsche ◽  
Christoph van Thriel

Non-invasive direct current stimulation (DCS) of the human brain induces neuronal plasticity and alters plasticity-related cognition and behavior. Numerous basic animal research studies focusing on molecular and cellular targets of DCS have been published. In vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro models enhanced knowledge about mechanistic foundations of DCS effects. Our review identified 451 papers using a PRISMA-based search strategy. Only a minority of these papers used cell culture or brain slice experiments with DCS paradigms comparable to those applied in humans. Most of the studies were performed in brain slices (9 papers), whereas cell culture experiments (2 papers) were only rarely conducted. These ex vivo and in vitro approaches underline the importance of cell and electric field orientation, cell morphology, cell location within populations, stimulation duration (acute, prolonged, chronic), and molecular changes, such as Ca2+-dependent intracellular signaling pathways, for the effects of DC stimulation. The reviewed studies help to clarify and confirm basic mechanisms of this intervention. However, the potential of in vitro studies has not been fully exploited and a more systematic combination of rodent models, ex vivo, and cellular approaches might provide a better insight into the neurophysiological changes caused by tDCS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document