Less is more – Pulse width dependent therapeutic window in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1132-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexia-Sabine Moldovan ◽  
Christian Johannes Hartmann ◽  
Carlos Trenado ◽  
Nicola Meumertzheim ◽  
Philipp Jörg Slotty ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (572) ◽  
pp. eaay7680
Author(s):  
Enrico Opri ◽  
Stephanie Cernera ◽  
Rene Molina ◽  
Robert S. Eisinger ◽  
Jackson N. Cagle ◽  
...  

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved therapy for the treatment of medically refractory and severe movement disorders. However, most existing neurostimulators can only apply continuous stimulation [open-loop DBS (OL-DBS)], ignoring patient behavior and environmental factors, which consequently leads to an inefficient therapy, thus limiting the therapeutic window. Here, we established the feasibility of a self-adjusting therapeutic DBS [closed-loop DBS (CL-DBS)], fully embedded in a chronic investigational neurostimulator (Activa PC + S), for three patients affected by essential tremor (ET) enrolled in a longitudinal (6 months) within-subject crossover protocol (DBS OFF, OL-DBS, and CL-DBS). Most patients with ET experience involuntary limb tremor during goal-directed movements, but not during rest. Hence, the proposed CL-DBS paradigm explored the efficacy of modulating the stimulation amplitude based on patient-specific motor behavior, suppressing the pathological tremor on-demand based on a cortical electrode detecting upper limb motor activity. Here, we demonstrated how the proposed stimulation paradigm was able to achieve clinical efficacy and tremor suppression comparable with OL-DBS in a range of movements (cup reaching, proximal and distal posture, water pouring, and writing) while having a consistent reduction in energy delivery. The proposed paradigm is an important step toward a behaviorally modulated fully embedded DBS system, capable of delivering stimulation only when needed, and potentially mitigating pitfalls of OL-DBS, such as DBS-induced side effects and premature device replacement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (9) ◽  
pp. 1046-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kroneberg ◽  
Siobhan Ewert ◽  
Anne-Christiane Meyer ◽  
Andrea A Kühn

ObjectiveGait disturbances are frequent side effects occurring during chronic thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with essential tremor (ET). Adapting stimulation settings to shorter pulse widths has been shown to reduce side effects of subthalamic DBS. Here, we assess how a reduction of pulse width changes gait performance of affected patients.MethodsSensor-based gait assessment was performed to record spatiotemporal gait parameters in 10 healthy subjects (HS) and 7 patients with ET with gait disturbances following thalamic DBS. Patients were tested during standard DBS, after 72 hours of stimulation withdrawal and at least 30 days after adjusting DBS settings to a shorter pulse width of 40 µs (DBS40PW).ResultsPatients with ET on standard DBS showed significantly higher variability of several spatiotemporal gait parameters compared with HS. Variability of stride length and range of motion of the shanks significantly decreased OFF DBS as compared with standard DBS. This improvement was maintained over 30 days with DBS40PW while providing effective tremor suppression in six out of seven patients.ConclusionShorter pulse widths may reduce gait disturbances in patients with ET that are induced by DBS while preserving a level of tremor suppression equal to standard stimulation settings.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Aline Seger ◽  
Alessandro Gulberti ◽  
Eik Vettorazzi ◽  
Hanna Braa ◽  
Carsten Buhmann ◽  
...  

Background: Gait disturbances and balance remain challenging issues in Parkinsonian patients (PD) with deep brain stimulation (DBS). Short pulse deep brain stimulation (spDBS) increases the therapeutic window in PD patients, yet the effect on gait and postural symptoms remains unknown. Objective: We assessed the efficacy of spDBS compared to conventional DBS (cDBS) within the subthalamic nucleus (STN) on Parkinsonian gait. Methods: The study was a single-centre, randomized, double-blind, clinical short-term trial. 20 PD patients were studied postoperatively in three different conditions (DBS stimulation switched off (off DBS), spDBS with 40μs pulse width, cDBS with 60μs pulse width) on regular medication. The primary endpoint was the relative difference of gait velocity at self-paced speed during quantitative gait analysis between stimulation conditions. Secondary endpoints were changes of further measures of quantitative gait analysis, Ziegler course, Berg balance scale, FOG questionnaire, MDS-UPDRS, PDQ-39, and HADS. Mixed-model analysis and post-hoc t-tests were performed. Results: Both spDBS and cDBS improved gait velocity at self-paced speed compared to off DBS, however, there was no significant difference between both stimulation modes. Still, nearly half of the patients preferred spDBS over cDBS subjectively. Both stimulation modes were equally effective in improving secondary endpoints of gait, balance, motor and non-motor performances. Conclusion: The use of spDBS and cDBS is equally effective in improving gait and balance in PD and might be beneficial in specified cohorts of PD patients.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e0145623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masa-aki Higuchi ◽  
Dan D. Topiol ◽  
Bilal Ahmed ◽  
Hokuto Morita ◽  
Samuel Carbunaru ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 394-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana H. de Oliveira ◽  
Matthew R. Ginsberg ◽  
Scott Cooper ◽  
Amy Nowacki ◽  
Ali Rezai ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 046005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Keane ◽  
Steve Deyo ◽  
Aviva Abosch ◽  
Jawad A Bajwa ◽  
Matthew D Johnson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document