Prevalence of an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome associated with the germ line TP53 R337H mutation in Paraguay

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Falcon-de Legal ◽  
Marta Ascurra ◽  
Gislaine Custódio ◽  
Horacio Legal Ayala ◽  
Magna Monteiro ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly M. Bailey ◽  
Michelle F. Jacobs ◽  
Bailey Anderson ◽  
Raja Rabah ◽  
Yi-Mi Wu ◽  
...  

PURPOSE DICER1 syndrome is a recently described inherited cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in DICER1. With the recent increase in integrative clinical sequencing for pediatric patients with cancer, our understanding of the DICER1 syndrome continues to evolve, as new and rare pathogenic variants are reported. As the frequency of integrative clinical sequencing increases, discussions regarding challenges encountered in the interpretation of sequencing results are essential to continue to advance the field of cancer predisposition. The purpose of this work was to identify patients with somatic and/or germline DICER1 variants in our patient population and to discuss sequencing interpretation and the clinical recommendations that result from the integrative clinical sequencing results. METHODS Patients were enrolled in the PEDS-MIONCOSEQ study. This integrative clinical sequencing study includes paired tumor/normal whole-exome sequencing and tumor transcriptome sequencing. Patients identified as having DICER1 variants were included. RESULTS We report a DICER1 variant of unknown clinical significance in a patient with a highly unusual response to therapy. Two patients had diagnoses clarified once the integrative clinical sequencing revealing a DICER1 variant was available. We also discovered a patient with low-level DICER1 mosaicism and the challenges encountered in the sequencing interpretation for this patient. In addition to the sequencing data and result interpretation, this work also highlights testing and screening recommendations made to patients with DICER1 variants and their families on the basis of these results. CONCLUSION This work serves to extend the DICER1 phenotype and advance the utility of clinical integrative sequencing in the fields of pediatric oncology and cancer genetic predisposition.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 441 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hamilton ◽  
E. Smith ◽  
J. Hamon ◽  
E. Tomiak ◽  
M. Bassal ◽  
...  

Objective We set out to identify and offer genetic testing to the 5%–10% of pediatric cancer patients who have been estimated to carry germline mutations in inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. Clinical genetic testing has become widely available, and thus in busy oncology clinics, tools are needed to identify patients who could benefit from a referral to genetics.Methods We studied the clinical utility of administering a family history form in the pediatric oncology long-term follow-up clinic to identify patients who might have an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome. Genetic testing involved primarily Sanger sequencing in clia (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments)–certified laboratories.Results Of 57 patients who completed forms, 19 (33.3%) met criteria for referral to genetics. A significant family history of cancer was present for 4 patients, and 12 patients underwent genetic testing. Of 18 genetic tests ordered, none identified a pathogenic mutation, likely because of a small sample size and a candidate-gene approach to testing. Three families were also identified for further assessment based on a family history of breast cancer, with two of families having members eligible for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.Conclusions Genetic testing in pediatric oncology patients is important to guide the management of patients who have an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome and to identify other family members at risk when mutations are identified. When no mutations are identified, that information is often reassuring to families who are worried about siblings. However, in the absence of an identified genetic cause in a patient, some uncertainty remains.


Author(s):  
Georgina M. Schlub ◽  
Ashley Crook ◽  
Kristine Barlow‐Stewart ◽  
Jane Fleming ◽  
Judy Kirk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Byrjalsen ◽  
Illja J. Diets ◽  
Jette Bakhuizen ◽  
Thomas van Overeem Hansen ◽  
Kjeld Schmiegelow ◽  
...  

AbstractIncreasing use of genomic sequencing enables standardized screening of all childhood cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) in children with cancer. Gene panels currently used often include adult-onset CPS genes and genes without substantial evidence linking them to cancer predisposition. We have developed criteria to select genes relevant for childhood-onset CPS and assembled a gene panel for use in children with cancer. We applied our criteria to 381 candidate genes, which were selected through two in-house panels (n = 338), a literature search (n = 39), and by assessing two Genomics England’s PanelApp panels (n = 4). We developed evaluation criteria that determined a gene’s eligibility for inclusion on a childhood-onset CPS gene panel. These criteria assessed (1) relevance in childhood cancer by a minimum of five childhood cancer patients reported carrying a pathogenic variant in the gene and (2) evidence supporting a causal relation between variants in this gene and cancer development. 138 genes fulfilled the criteria. In this study we have developed criteria to compile a childhood cancer predisposition gene panel which might ultimately be used in a clinical setting, regardless of the specific type of childhood cancer. This panel will be evaluated in a prospective study. The panel is available on (pediatric-cancer-predisposition-genepanel.nl) and will be regularly updated.


2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha M. Archer ◽  
Renata Parada Amorim ◽  
Rafaela Naves ◽  
Simone Hettmer ◽  
Lisa R. Diller ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
pp. 358-371
Author(s):  
Rosalind A. Eeles

All cancer can be termed ‘genetic’ as cancer is caused by somatic cell mutations (alterations in the DNA code), which result in abnormal cellular growth and/or proliferation. Most of these mutations are sporadic (only occurring in the cancer cell), but some are due to the inheritance of a germ-line mutation in a cancer predisposition gene....


2020 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106656
Author(s):  
Sapna Mehta ◽  
Dennis John Kuo

Genetic cancer predisposition testing in the paediatric population poses unique ethical dilemmas. Using the hypothetical example of a teenager with cancer with a high probability of having an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome, we discuss the ethical considerations that affect the decision-making process. Because legally these decisions are made by parents, genetic testing in paediatrics can remove a child’s autonomy to preserve his or her own ‘open future’. However, knowledge of results confirming a predisposition syndrome can potentially be beneficial in modifying treatment and surveillance plans and enabling at-risk family members to obtain cascade testing for themselves. Considering virtue ethics to envision the best characters of the patient, parents and healthcare providers can guide them to the better choice to test or not to test, with the ultimate goal of achieving the best outcome for survival and eudaimonia, human flourishing reliably sought out.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. e204-e216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Coury ◽  
Katherine A. Schneider ◽  
Jaclyn Schienda ◽  
Wen-Hann Tan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document