Recognizing and Managing Children with a Pediatric Cancer Predisposition Syndrome: A Guide for the Pediatrician

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. e204-e216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Coury ◽  
Katherine A. Schneider ◽  
Jaclyn Schienda ◽  
Wen-Hann Tan
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Byrjalsen ◽  
Illja J. Diets ◽  
Jette Bakhuizen ◽  
Thomas van Overeem Hansen ◽  
Kjeld Schmiegelow ◽  
...  

AbstractIncreasing use of genomic sequencing enables standardized screening of all childhood cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) in children with cancer. Gene panels currently used often include adult-onset CPS genes and genes without substantial evidence linking them to cancer predisposition. We have developed criteria to select genes relevant for childhood-onset CPS and assembled a gene panel for use in children with cancer. We applied our criteria to 381 candidate genes, which were selected through two in-house panels (n = 338), a literature search (n = 39), and by assessing two Genomics England’s PanelApp panels (n = 4). We developed evaluation criteria that determined a gene’s eligibility for inclusion on a childhood-onset CPS gene panel. These criteria assessed (1) relevance in childhood cancer by a minimum of five childhood cancer patients reported carrying a pathogenic variant in the gene and (2) evidence supporting a causal relation between variants in this gene and cancer development. 138 genes fulfilled the criteria. In this study we have developed criteria to compile a childhood cancer predisposition gene panel which might ultimately be used in a clinical setting, regardless of the specific type of childhood cancer. This panel will be evaluated in a prospective study. The panel is available on (pediatric-cancer-predisposition-genepanel.nl) and will be regularly updated.


2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha M. Archer ◽  
Renata Parada Amorim ◽  
Rafaela Naves ◽  
Simone Hettmer ◽  
Lisa R. Diller ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Mastronuzzi ◽  
Luigi Boccuto ◽  
Riccardo Masetti

2020 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106656
Author(s):  
Sapna Mehta ◽  
Dennis John Kuo

Genetic cancer predisposition testing in the paediatric population poses unique ethical dilemmas. Using the hypothetical example of a teenager with cancer with a high probability of having an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome, we discuss the ethical considerations that affect the decision-making process. Because legally these decisions are made by parents, genetic testing in paediatrics can remove a child’s autonomy to preserve his or her own ‘open future’. However, knowledge of results confirming a predisposition syndrome can potentially be beneficial in modifying treatment and surveillance plans and enabling at-risk family members to obtain cascade testing for themselves. Considering virtue ethics to envision the best characters of the patient, parents and healthcare providers can guide them to the better choice to test or not to test, with the ultimate goal of achieving the best outcome for survival and eudaimonia, human flourishing reliably sought out.


2010 ◽  
Vol 70 (12) ◽  
pp. 4891-4900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saskia J.E. Suijkerbuijk ◽  
Maria H.J. van Osch ◽  
Frank L. Bos ◽  
Sandra Hanks ◽  
Nazneen Rahman ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 127-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Walsh ◽  
Gang Wu ◽  
Michael Edmonson ◽  
Tanja A Gruber ◽  
John Easton ◽  
...  

Abstract Pathologic germ line mutations that predispose patients to cancer are estimated to occur in 4-30% of all pediatric oncology cases. In addition to leukemia specific familial predisposition syndromes, children with rare constitutional syndromes, heterogeneous dysmorphic syndromes, and multiple-cancer hereditary predisposition syndromes are all at an increased risk for hematologic malignancies. However, to date no genome-wide analysis has been done to define the range of germ line mutations that occur in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies. To determine the frequency of pediatric cancer patients that have germ line variants of pathological significance in genes that predisposed to cancer, we analyzed the germ line and tumor DNA from 1120 pediatric cancer patients that were enrolled in the St. Jude – Washington University Pediatric Cancer Genome Project (PCGP). Samples were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (n = 595), whole-exome sequencing (n = 456), or both (n = 69). Single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions/deletions (indels), structural variations (SV) and copy number alterations (CNAs) were detected using our analytical pipeline and all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously identified in non-cancer populations were filtered out. Our analysis then focused on the 23 cancer predisposition genes recently recommended for germ line analysis by the American College of Genetics and Genomics, along with an additional 8 genes that have been previously shown to predispose to pediatric cancer at a high penetrance. All variants in these 31 genes were classified as pathologic, likely pathologic, uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign based on literature review and in-silico predictions on the effect of novel mutations. An expanded analysis including a total of 565 genes known to play a role in oncogenesis was also evaluated. Pathologic or likely pathologic germ line variants in one of the 31 genes were detected in 8% (90/1120) of patients, including: 16% (46/287) of patients with solid tumors, 8.6% (21/245) with brain tumors, and 3.9% (23/588) with leukemia. Expanding this analysis to 565 cancer gene resulted in only a slight increase, with a pathologic or likely pathologic variant being detected in 8.6% (97/1120) of patients. The most frequently effected genes included TP53 (n=48), APC (n=7) and BRCA2(n=6). Importantly, in >50% of these patients, analysis of their tumor DNA revealed the absence of a wild type allele for the cancer predisposition gene that was altered in the germ line. The 588 pediatric patients with leukemia included 116 acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs: FAB M7 n=20; Core Binding Factor leukemias n=86; MLL-R n=10) and 472 acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALLs: E2A-PBX1 n=53; ERG-R n=39; TEL-AML1 n=53; Hyperdiploid n=69; Hypodiploid n=47; BCR-ABL1 n=40; T-ALL n=32; MLL-R n=40; BCR-ABL-like n=31; and Other n=68). Across this cohort, 3.9% (23/588) of leukemia patients harbored a pathologic germ line mutations in one of the 31 cancer pre-disposing genes. This number increased to 4.6% (27/588; 28 mutations) when the expanded gene list was evaluated. TP53 (n=10) was the most frequently altered germ line gene in pediatric leukemia patients and was found predominantly in low-hypodiploid ALL, as previously reported. Germ line pathologic variants were also identified in KRAS, RUNX1, APC, BRCA2, and RET (2 cases each), and NRAS, SH2B3, BRCA1, MUTYH, PTCH1, SDHA,VHL, and NF2 (1 case each). Although germ line mutations in RUNX1 and SH2B3are typically associated with myeloid neoplasms, we identified these lesions in 3 cases of B lineage ALL suggesting an association with a wider spectrum of leukemia. In conclusion, a small but significant proportion of pediatric patients with leukemia carry a germ line variant of pathologic significance in a cancer predisposition gene. These results suggest that these germ line lesions likely play a direct role in the pathogenesis of the patient’s presenting leukemia. Moreover, our results suggest that these patients would benefit from future clinical surveillance for the development of a second cancer. Lastly, these data demonstrate the power of comprehensive next generation DNA/RNA sequencing for the identification of pediatric patients who carry a germ line pathologic variant in a cancer predisposition gene. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i31-i31
Author(s):  
Yuan Pan ◽  
Jared Hysinger ◽  
Nicki Schindler ◽  
Olivia Cobb ◽  
Xiaofan Guo ◽  
...  

Abstract Neurons have recently emerged as essential cellular constituents of the tumor microenvironment, where their activity increases the growth of a diverse number of solid tumors. While the role of neurons in tumor progression has been previously demonstrated, the importance of neuronal activity to tumor initiation is less clear, particularly in the setting of cancer predisposition syndromes. In the Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) cancer predisposition syndrome, in which tumors arise in close association with nerves, 15% of individuals develop low-grade neoplasms of the optic pathway (optic gliomas) during early childhood, raising the intriguing possibility that postnatal light-induced optic nerve activity drives tumor initiation. Here, we employ an authenticated murine model of Nf1 optic glioma to demonstrate that stimulation of optic nerve activity increases optic glioma growth, while decreasing optic nerve activity via light deprivation prevents tumor formation and maintenance. By manipulating environmental light to modulate optic pathway (retinal) neuron activity, we show that Nf1 optic glioma initiation depends on neuronal activity during a developmental period susceptible to tumorigenesis. Germline Nf1 mutation in retinal neurons results in aberrantly high optic nerve neuroligin-3 (Nlgn3) shedding in response to retinal neuronal activity. Moreover, genetic Nlgn3 loss or pharmacologic inhibition of Nlgn3 shedding blocks murine Nf1 optic gliomagenesis and progression. Collectively, these studies establish an obligate role for neuronal activity in the development of certain brain tumors, elucidate a therapeutic strategy to reduce optic glioma incidence or mitigate tumor progression, and underscore the role of Nf1 mutation-mediated dysregulation of neuronal signaling pathways in the NF1 cancer predisposition syndrome.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 5016
Author(s):  
Nils Welter ◽  
Angelo Wagner ◽  
Rhoikos Furtwängler ◽  
Patrick Melchior ◽  
Leo Kager ◽  
...  

(1) Background: about 10% of Wilms Tumor (WT) patients have a malformation or cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) with causative germline genetic or epigenetic variants. Knowledge on CPS is essential for genetic counselling. (2) Methods: this retrospective analysis focused on 2927 consecutive patients with WTs registered between 1989 and 2017 in the SIOP/GPOH studies. (3) Results: Genitourinary malformations (GU, N = 66, 2.3%), Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum (BWS, N = 32, 1.1%), isolated hemihypertrophy (IHH, N = 29, 1.0%), Denys-Drash syndrome (DDS, N = 24, 0.8%) and WAGR syndrome (N = 20, 0.7%) were reported most frequently. Compared to others, these patients were younger at WT diagnosis (median age 24.5 months vs. 39.0 months), had smaller tumors (349.4 mL vs. 487.5 mL), less often metastasis (8.2% vs. 18%), but more often nephroblastomatosis (12.9% vs. 1.9%). WT with IHH was associated with blastemal WT and DDS with stromal subtype. Bilateral WTs were common in WAGR (30%), DDS (29%) and BWS (31%). Chemotherapy induced reduction in tumor volume was poor in DDS (0.4% increase) and favorable in BWS (86.9% reduction). The event-free survival (EFS) of patients with BWS was significantly (p = 0.002) worse than in others. (4) Conclusions: CPS should be considered in WTs with specific clinical features resulting in referral to a geneticist. Their outcome was not always favorable.


Author(s):  
Grace E. McKay ◽  
Anna L. Zakas ◽  
Fauzia Osman ◽  
Amanda Parkes

Background: Given a link between sarcomas and hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes, including Li-Fraumeni syndrome, the consideration for genetic counseling is recommended for all adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients diagnosed with sarcoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors influencing genetic consultations in AYA patients with sarcoma at the University of Wisconsin (UW). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on AYA patients diagnosed with sarcoma between the ages of 15 and 39 years who were seen at least once between 2015 to 2019 at UW. Our chart review identified discussions regarding genetics, referrals to genetics, genetic consultations, and results of genetic testing. Variables hypothesized to affect patient referrals for genetic consultation were identified a priori. Descriptive statistical methods and a univariate analysis were used to identify patient characteristics associated with genetic counseling referral. Results: We identified 87 AYA patients with sarcoma. Only 19 (22%) of these patients had documentation of a discussion about genetics, 15 (17%) of whom were subsequently referred for genetic consultation. Of these 15 patients, 9 (60%) were seen in consultation. All 9 patients seen by genetics underwent genetic testing, with 4 (44%) of these patients having identified heritable cancer predisposition syndromes. Likelihood for genetics referral was linked most strongly to documented genetics discussion with an oncology provider (P<.001). Conclusions: Despite the recommendation for consideration for genetic counseling in AYA patients with sarcoma, <25% of such patients in our study had a documented discussion about genetics. Supporting this need, all referred patients met criteria for genetic testing, and 44% of tested patients were found to have a heritable cancer predisposition syndrome. These data support the initial conversation by a provider as critical to genetic referral and suggest the need for more specific national recommendations for the genetic evaluation of all AYA patients with sarcoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document