Modified potentiometric titration method to distinguish and quantify oxygenated functional groups on carbon materials by pKa and chemical reactivity

Carbon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 166 ◽  
pp. 436-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongyao Zhang ◽  
David W. Flaherty
Keyword(s):  
Potentiometric Titration ◽  
Functional Groups ◽  
Carbon Materials ◽  
Chemical Reactivity ◽  
Titration Method ◽  
Potentiometric Titration Method ◽  
Oxygenated Functional Groups

HYDROLYSIS OF CELLULOSE ACETATE SULPHATE IN ACETONE

1954 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 815-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Keirstead ◽  
John Myers
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Cellulose Acetate ◽  
Sulphuric Acid ◽  
Potentiometric Titration ◽  
Titration Method ◽  
Acetate Ester ◽  
Hydrolysis Of Cellulose ◽  
Potentiometric Titration Method ◽  
Hydrolysis Of

When cellulose acetate sulphate is dissolved in acetone the hydrolysis of the sulphate ester is rapid compared with that of the acetate ester. In 70% acetone the relative rates are reversed. Hydrolysis of the sulphate ester in acetone is greatly affected by the temperature. At 25 °C. or greater the hydrolysis is complete after 24 hr. A potentiometric titration method has been developed for the estimation of sulphuric acid in the presence of smaller amounts of acetic acid.

scholarly journals Potentiometric Determination of Minoxidil in Topical Use Pharmaceutical Samples

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Rogério Adelino De Sousa ◽  
Éder Tadeu Gomes Cavalheiro
Keyword(s):  
Potentiometric Titration ◽  
Confidence Level ◽  
Redox Reaction ◽  
Potentiometric Determination ◽  
Titration Method ◽  
Pharmaceutical Samples ◽  
Chromatographic Procedure ◽  
Potentiometric Titration Method

A potentiometric titration method for the determination of minoxidil based on its redox reaction with K2Cr2O7 is described. The best results were observed using 1.00 x 10-3 mol L-1 K2Cr2O7 and 1.00 x 10-2 mol L-1 minoxidil solutions, and the minoxidil as titrant in 2.00 mol L-1 H2SO4 medium. The method was applied to commercial samples and compared with the results from a chromatographic procedure. Recoveries from 97.4 to 98.7 % were observed depending on the sample. Comparison with the chromatographic procedure reveled agreement within 90% confidence level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document