Soil quality evaluation of various microtopography types at different restoration modes in the loess area of Northern Shaanxi

CATENA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 207 ◽  
pp. 105633
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Zhang ◽  
Ning Ai ◽  
Guangquan Liu ◽  
Changhai Liu ◽  
Fangfang Qiang
CATENA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linlin Guo ◽  
Zhigang Sun ◽  
Zhu Ouyang ◽  
Daorui Han ◽  
Fadong Li

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 3443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoubao Geng ◽  
Peili Shi ◽  
Ning Zong ◽  
Wanrui Zhu

Soil quality evaluation is an effective pathway to understanding the status of soil function and ecosystem productivity. Numerous studies have been made in managed ecosystems and land cover to quantify its effects on soil quality. However, little is coincident regarding soil quality assessment methods and its compatibility in highly heterogeneous soil. This paper used the soil survey database of Taihang Mountains as a case study to: (i) Examine the feasibility of soil quality evaluation with two different indicator methods: Total data set (TDS) and minimum data set (MDS); and (ii) analyze the controlling factors of regional soil quality. Principal component analysis (PCA) and the entropy method were used to calculate soil quality index (SQI). SQI values assessed from the TDS and MDS methods were both significantly correlated with normalized difference vegetation index (p < 0.001), suggesting that both indices were effective to describe soil quality and reflect vegetation growth status. However, the TDS method represented a slightly more accurate assessment than MDS in terms of variance explanation. Boosted regression trees (BRT) models and path analysis showed that soil type and land cover were the most important controlling factors of soil quality, within which soil type had the greatest direct effect and land cover had the most indirect effect. Compared to MDS, TDS is a more sensitive method for assessing regional soil quality, especially in heterogeneous mountains. Soil type is the fundamental factor to determining soil quality. Vegetation and land cover indirectly modulate soil properties and soil quality.


2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (63) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. U. Onweremadu ◽  
I. C. Okoli ◽  
O. O. Emenalom ◽  
M. N. Opara ◽  
E. T. Eshett

Heightened anthropogenic activities at the study site necessitated this investigation on soil quality. A transect soil survey technique was used to link sampled points from an open dumpsite towards the river valley. Three minipedons were dug and sampled per location and collected samples were used for various laboratory analyses. Results showed that soils of the dumpsite (OB1) had the highest soil quality morphological index (SQMI) value of 3.82, indicating best quality while the least SQMI was found in the ranch (SQMI = 1.27). The SQMI had significant correlations with OM (organic matter) (r=0.82; p=0.001; n=72), clay (r=65; p=0.01; n=72), pH(r=0.58; p=0.01; n=72) and bulk density (r=0.71; p=0.05; p=0.05; n=72). Although there were positive correlations between SQMI and copper and cadmium, heavy metals were poor predictors of SQMI, indicating that soil quality evaluation by SQMI assesses mainly soil physical fertility.


2014 ◽  
Vol 72 (11) ◽  
pp. 4531-4549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent de Paul Obade ◽  
Rattan Lal

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Ali Asad Naqvi ◽  
Aqsa Islam ◽  
Liaqat Ali Wasem ◽  
Dostdar Hussain ◽  
Rubab Zahra Naqvi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document