Different stapling-based peptide drug design: Mimicking α-helix as inhibitors of protein–protein interaction

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1088-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Li ◽  
Yan Zou ◽  
Hong-Gang Hu
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 957-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo G. Ferreira ◽  
Glaucius Oliva ◽  
Adriano D. Andricopulo

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (17) ◽  
pp. 3504-3512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panchami Prabhakaran ◽  
Anna Barnard ◽  
Natasha S. Murphy ◽  
Colin A. Kilner ◽  
Thomas A. Edwards ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 787-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Incerti ◽  
Simonetta Russo ◽  
Donatella Callegari ◽  
Daniele Pala ◽  
Carmine Giorgio ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 393
Author(s):  
Sebastjan Kralj ◽  
Marko Jukič ◽  
Urban Bren

Since December 2019, the new SARS-CoV-2-related COVID-19 disease has caused a global pandemic and shut down the public life worldwide. Several proteins have emerged as potential therapeutic targets for drug development, and we sought out to review the commercially available and marketed SARS-CoV-2-targeted libraries ready for high-throughput virtual screening (HTVS). We evaluated the SARS-CoV-2-targeted, protease-inhibitor-focused and protein–protein-interaction-inhibitor-focused libraries to gain a better understanding of how these libraries were designed. The most common were ligand- and structure-based approaches, along with various filtering steps, using molecular descriptors. Often, these methods were combined to obtain the final library. We recognized the abundance of targeted libraries offered and complimented by the inclusion of analytical data; however, serious concerns had to be raised. Namely, vendors lack the information on the library design and the references to the primary literature. Few references to active compounds were also provided when using the ligand-based design and usually only protein classes or a general panel of targets were listed, along with a general reference to the methods, such as molecular docking for the structure-based design. No receptor data, docking protocols or even references to the applied molecular docking software (or other HTVS software), and no pharmacophore or filter design details were given. No detailed functional group or chemical space analyses were reported, and no specific orientation of the libraries toward the design of covalent or noncovalent inhibitors could be observed. All libraries contained pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS), rapid elimination of swill compounds (REOS) and aggregators, as well as focused on the drug-like model, with the majority of compounds possessing their molecular mass around 500 g/mol. These facts do not bode well for the use of the reviewed libraries in drug design and lend themselves to commercial drug companies to focus on and improve.


MedChemComm ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1247-1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Edward Martucci ◽  
Johanna M. Rodriguez ◽  
Melissa A. Vargo ◽  
Matthew Marr ◽  
Andrew D. Hamilton ◽  
...  

The bifunctional enzyme TS–DHFR from Cryptosporidium hominis is a molecular target for design of antiparasitic therapies for AIDS-related opportunistic infections.


2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Gentile ◽  
Ahmed H. Elmenoufy ◽  
Gloria Ciniero ◽  
David Jay ◽  
Feridoun Karimi‐Busheri ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 4188-4202 ◽  
Author(s):  
George M. Burslem ◽  
Hannah F. Kyle ◽  
Adam Nelson ◽  
Thomas A. Edwards ◽  
Andrew J. Wilson

The state of the art in identifying protein–protein interaction inhibitors of hypoxia inducible factor – a promising target for anticancer drug design – is described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document