Reducing electric current and energy consumption of spark plasma sintering via punch configuration design

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (18) ◽  
pp. 17225-17228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liqing Huang ◽  
Ma Qian ◽  
Haibo Lu ◽  
Yong Sun ◽  
Lihua Wang ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 356 ◽  
pp. 769-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenghua Deng ◽  
Hongjin Zhao ◽  
Ruidi Li ◽  
Tiechui Yuan ◽  
Lanbo Li ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 616 ◽  
pp. 199-203
Author(s):  
Qi Zhong Li ◽  
Dong Ming Zhang ◽  
Lian Meng Zhang

Porous Al with controlled pore size was prepared by the spacer method including spark plasma sintering and the dissolution of space-holding NaCl particles. The NaCl of the controlled pore size (particle diameter control range of 5˰ڌm~20˰ڌm) were prepared by precipitation method. The effects of sintering condition such as the sintering electric current intensity, voltage and the size, morphology and content of NaCl powder on the porosity and size of porous Al are investigated. The porous Al with higher porosity of 69.41% and smaller pore size of 5 ڌm was obtained.


2016 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 436-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastián Díaz de la Torre ◽  
Ladislav Čelko ◽  
Mariano Casas Luna ◽  
Edgar Benjamin Montúfar Jimenéz

A general overview on the processing of a series of advanced engineering materials, synthesized via pulsed-electric-current-sintering related techniques, and the similarities in between those techniques are introduced in this work. This paper is focused on two major techniques; namely, the Spark Plasma Extrusion (SPE) and Current Assisted Infiltration Sintering (CAIS), which in turn are derived from the Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) technique, all widely used by this research group. Not only the geometry but also the microstructure of thus prepared specimens might vary depending on the selected technique. The resulting specimens can be under the forms of discs (flat or thick coin-like), rivets (enlarged cylindrical bars)-like and/or disclosing interpenetrated periodic networks with regular or irregular (either coin or rivet/screw)-like specimens, respectively. As for the CAIS technique, either 3D printed ceramic frameworks or naturally synthesized porous substrates (such as bone-like structures), can be infiltrated with virtually any metal or alloy. Among the series of produced materials we can include, for example: biomaterials such as: Ti-and Mg-hydroxyapatite, pure hydroxyapatite HA, composites, e.g., Al5083-CNT ́s, just to name a few. The expanding possibilities of SPS, SPE and CAIS techniques are briefly indicated here.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matic Korent ◽  
Marko Soderžnik ◽  
Urška Ročnik ◽  
Sandra Drev ◽  
Kristina Žužek Rožman ◽  
...  

In this work, we present a newly developed, economically efficient method for processing rare-earth Nd-Fe-B magnets based on spark plasma sintering. It makes us possible to retain the technologically essential properties of the produced magnet by consuming about 30% of the energy as compared to the conventional SPS process. A magnet with anisotropic microstructure was fabricated from MQU F commercial ribbons by low energy consumption (0.37 MJ) during the deformation process and compared to the conventionally prepared hot-deformed magnet, which consumed 3-times more energy (1.2 MJ). Both magnets were post-annealed at 650 °C for 120 min in a vacuum. After the postannealing process, the low-energy processing (LEP) hot-deformed magnet showed a coercivity of 1327 kAm-1, and remanent magnetization of 1.27 T. In comparison, the highenergy processing (HEP) hot-deformed magnet had a coercivity of 1337 kAm-1 and a remanent magnetization of 1.31 T. Complete microstructural characterization and detailed statistical analyses revealed a better texture orientation for the HEP hot-deformed magnet processed by high energy consumption, which is the main reason for the difference in remanent magnetization between the two hot-deformed magnets. The results show that, although the LEP hot-deformed magnet was processed by three times lower energy consumption than in a typical hot-deformation process, the maximum energy product is only 8 % lower than the maximum energy product of a HEP hot-deformed magnet.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document