Applicability of DLC and WC/C low friction coatings on Al2O3/TiCN mixed ceramic cutting tools for dry machining of hardened 52100 steel

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 11889-11897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch Sateesh Kumar ◽  
Himadri Majumder ◽  
Akhtar Khan ◽  
Saroj Kumar Patel
2013 ◽  
Vol 309 ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyula Varga ◽  
János Kundrák

Modern machining processes continuously face cost pressures and high quality expectations. To remain competitive a company must continually identify cost reduction opportunities in production, exploit economic opportunities, and continuously improve production processes. A key technology that represents cost saving opportunities related to cooling lubrication, and simultaneously improves the overall performance of cutting operations, is dry machining. The elimination of coolants or significant reduction in cooling lubricants affects all components of a production system. A detailed analysis and adaptation of cutting parameters, cutting tools, machine tools and the production environment is mandatory to ensure an efficient process and successfully enable dry machining. Case study is shown for examination of cylindricity error and surface roughness of helical milling machined surfaces by environmentally conscious way.


Author(s):  
Boki Dugo Bedada ◽  
Guteta Kabeta Woyesssa ◽  
Moera Gutu Jiru ◽  
Besufekad Negash Fetene ◽  
Tekle Gemechu

In this study, the experiment was conducted to investigate the advantage of dry machining over wet machining during turning of AISI 1020 steel using cemented carbide tool on a CNC lathe machine. Surface roughness and cutting temperature were measured by VOGEL surface roughness tester and infrared thermometer respectively. The experiments were conducted based on Taguchi L9 orthogonal array design. Surface roughness, cutting temperature, tool life, and machining cost were analyzed graphically. The average surface roughness and cutting temperature achieved with wet machining was 2.01 μm and 26.540C, which was 17.41% and 44.86% respectively, lower than dry machining. The high cutting temperature in dry turning result in short tool life, which was 41.15% shorter than wet turning. The machining cost of wet turning was about 56% greater than the cost of dry turning. The cost of coolant in wet turning is 42.88% greater than that of the cutting tools. The highest cost was shared by tool cost, which was 81.33% of the total cost for dry turning, while 70.00% of the total cost was shared by coolant cost for wet turning. Results revealed that dry turning is more economical than wet turning.


Wear ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 374-375 ◽  
pp. 104-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Furushima ◽  
K. Shimojima ◽  
H. Hosokawa ◽  
A. Matsumoto

1996 ◽  
Vol 86-87 ◽  
pp. 803-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Lugscheider ◽  
H.D. Geiler ◽  
M. Lake ◽  
H. Zimmermann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document