scholarly journals Corrigendum to “Baseline closure model for dispersed bubbly flow bubble coalescence and breakup” [Chem. Eng. Sci. 122 (2015) 336–349]

2021 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 116708
Author(s):  
Yixiang Liao ◽  
Roland Rzehak ◽  
Dirk Lucas ◽  
Eckhard Krepper
2015 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 336-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixiang Liao ◽  
Roland Rzehak ◽  
Dirk Lucas ◽  
Eckhard Krepper

Author(s):  
Daeseong Jo ◽  
Shripad T. Revankar

A two phase bubbly flow through a packed bed was studied for dominant bubble breakup and coalescence mechanisms through experiments and CFD modeling. Data on various two-phase parameters, such as local void fraction, bubble velocity, size, number, and shape were obtained from the high speed video images. Results indicated that when a flow regime changed from bubbly to either trickling or pulsing flow, the number of average size bubbles significantly decreased and the shape of majority of bubbles was no longer spherical. The bubble coalescence and breakup mechanisms depend on local conditions such as local velocity of the bubble and pore geometry. The CFD analysis using CFX software package was carried out to study bubble size distributions. In the analysis the models for interactions were examined for each case of bubble breakup flow and bubble coalescence. A comparative study was performed on the resulting bubble size distributions, breakup and coalescence rates estimated by individual models. For change of bubble size distributions along the axial direction medians was used as an comparative parameter and the CFD results on bubble medians were compared against the experimental data. This comparative study showed that the predictions estimated by CFD analyses with the bubble breakup and coalescence models currently available in the literature do not agree with the experimental data.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munenori Maekawa ◽  
Naoki Shimada ◽  
Kouji Kinoshita ◽  
Akira Sou ◽  
Akio Tomiyama

Numerical methods for predicting heterogeneous bubbly flows are indispensable for the design of a Fisher-Tropsh reactor for GTL (Gas To Liquid). It is necessary to take into account bubble size distribution determined by bubble coalescence and breakup for the accurate prediction of heterogeneous bubbly flows. Hence we implemented several bubble coalescence and breakup models into the (N+2) field model, which is a hybrid combination of an interface tracking method and a multi-fluid model. Void and bubble size distributions in an open rectangular bubble column were measured and compared with predicted ones. As a result, the following conclusions were obtained: (1) Void and bubble size distributions were not affected by inlet bubble sizes because the bubble size distribution reaches an equilibrium state at which the birth rate is equal to the death rate, and (2) the combination of Luo’s bubble breakup model and a coalescence model consisting of Prince & Blanch’s model and Wang’s wake entrainment model gave good predictions.


1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 257-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akimi Serizawa ◽  
Isao Kataoka ◽  
Itaru Michiyoshi

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 25-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Rykaart ◽  
J. Haarhoff

A simple two-phase conceptual model is postulated to explain the initial growth of microbubbles after pressure release in dissolved air flotation. During the first phase bubbles merely expand from existing nucleation centres as air precipitates from solution, without bubble coalescence. This phase ends when all excess air is transferred to the gas phase. During the second phase, the total air volume remains the same, but bubbles continue to grow due to bubble coalescence. This model is used to explain the results from experiments where three different nozzle variations were tested, namely a nozzle with an impinging surface immediately outside the nozzle orifice, a nozzle with a bend in the nozzle channel, and a nozzle with a tapering outlet immediately outside the nozzle orifice. From these experiments, it is inferred that the first phase of bubble growth is completed at approximately 1.7 ms after the start of pressure release.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. N. Kashinsky ◽  
A. S. Kurdyumov ◽  
P. D. Lobanov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document