An odyssey of virtual global team activity in the experiential learning environment of the Global Enterprise Experience (GEE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 105760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Cathro
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Global Team ◽  
Team Activity

Introduction to Games-Based Learning

2009 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Tang ◽  
Martin Hanneghan ◽  
Abdennour El Rhalibi
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
21St Century ◽  
Virtual Learning ◽  
Virtual Learning Environment ◽  
Quality Education ◽  
High Quality ◽  
High Quality Education ◽  
Game Context

Games-based learning takes advantage of gaming technologies to create a fun, motivating, and interactive virtual learning environment that promotes situated experiential learning. Many researchers now believe that this approach can better motivate present day entertainment-driven learners to more thoroughly engage in learning through meaningful activities defined in the game context as opposed to those offered using more traditional didactic approaches. This chapter describes games-based learning, the related terms and scope, current approaches, embedded pedagogies and challenges for providing high-quality education in the 21st Century.

scholarly journals Improving Biomedical Engineering Education Through Continuity in Adaptive, Experiential, and Interdisciplinary Learning Environments

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Singh ◽  
Dawn Ferry ◽  
Susan Mills
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Real World ◽  
Biomedical Engineering ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Interdisciplinary Teams ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Clinical Learning Environment ◽  
Interdisciplinary Learning

This study reports our experience of developing a series of biomedical engineering (BME) courses having active and experiential learning components in an interdisciplinary learning environment. In the first course, BME465: biomechanics, students were immersed in a simulation laboratory setting involving mannequins that are currently used for teaching in the School of Nursing. Each team identified possible technological challenges directly related to the biomechanics of the mannequin and presented an improvement overcoming the challenge. This approach of exposing engineering students to a problem in a clinical learning environment enhanced the adaptive and experiential learning capabilities of the course. In the following semester, through BME448: medical devices, engineering students were partnered with nursing students and exposed to simulation scenarios and real-world clinical settings. They were required to identify three unmet needs in the real-world clinical settings and propose a viable engineering solution. This approach helped BME students to understand and employ real-world applications of engineering principles in problem solving while being exposed to an interdisciplinary collaborative environment. A final step was for engineering students to execute their proposed solution from either BME465 or BME448 courses by undertaking it as their capstone senior design project (ENGR401-402). Overall, the inclusion of clinical immersions in interdisciplinary teams in a series of courses not only allowed the integration of active and experiential learning in continuity but also offered engineers more practice of their profession, adaptive expertise, and an understanding of roles and expertise of other professionals involved in enhancement of healthcare and patient safety.

Enhancing Experiential Learning in Collaborative-Competitive Student Design Teams

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Hurdelbrink ◽  
Bobby Doyle ◽  
David Collins ◽  
Nic N. Evans ◽  
Paul A. Hatch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Learning Opportunities ◽  
Design Teams ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
New Members ◽  
Student Centered Learning ◽  
Concrete Experience ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Team Design

Engineering educators and practitioners have suggested that collaborative-competitive team design events promote innovation. These competitions are popular, and they attract sponsors and participants. Beyond being popular, they are believed to provide rich learning opportunities for students. In this paper we present a peer-to-peer learning environment for student centered learning to have a more appropriate mix of theory and experience (hands-on activities) to provide a complete experiential learning environment for collaborative-competitive student design teams. A student-taught seminar course on designing an FSAE vehicle is being offered to new members of the team to address issues in collaborative-competitive student design teams, which addresses the concrete experience and active experimentation element of the experiential model, but has deficiencies in the reflective observation and abstract conceptualization elements of the cycle. In this paper we will present the structure of the seminar course and how it tries to support and enhance the experiential learning in the FSAE team.

scholarly journals A Critical Assessment of an Extended Learning Environment in Interior Design Studio

2021 ◽  
pp. 71-81
Author(s):  
Zeynep Ceylanli ◽  
◽  
Elif Aktas Yanas ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Interior Design ◽  
Critical Assessment ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Exploratory Research ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Project Outcome ◽  
New Perspective ◽  
Interactive Experience

This paper presents a critical assessment of an interior design studio that was constructed face-to-face then online as an extended studio environment through spatial and technological means. In the Interior Design Studio III, students were expected to design an experiential retail store aiming at answering the contemporary customer and brand interactive experience. The concept of ‘interactive experience’ was central not only in terms of a project outcome but also of the studio process: an experiential learning environment is designed to enhance the understanding of the design studio. Within this scope, the collaboration with the maker lab of the university provided technological interfaces and analog model making methods while also expanding the limits of studio space. The interactive experience would not only result in the project outcome but also be integrated to the studio model. This studio model and the topic was conducted face-to-face in the campus three semesters consecutively, while the following two were held online. The study is based on exploratory research using qualitative techniques to analyze the design process of the students in the face-to-face and online experiential learning environment. The main objective is to overview and assess the interior design studio by providing a new perspective to the students about space and user relationship regarding interaction and atmosphere not only in terms of the given design problem but also the ‘environment’ they are experiencing the ways of design.

scholarly journals Students’ Experiential Learning in Botanic Garden Leisure Setting

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Noralizawati Mohamed ◽  
Noriah Othman
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Cognitive Skills ◽  
Outdoor Recreation ◽  
Publishing House ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Education Programme ◽  
Botanical Garden ◽  
Botanic Garden ◽  
International Publishing

Botanic garden is associated with environment conservation, outdoor recreation and education programme for students. The learning opportunities that take place in the garden functions as a window of knowledge, a platform to build better understanding beside aroused cognitive skills during visitation. This study is aimed to identify the potential of Putrajaya Botanical Garden as a learning environment. The finding showed the male respondents rated higher than the female in all attributes associated with experiential learning at the garden. With good practice of design and management, this garden can continuously serves as successful educational learning environment and achieve its mission.Keywords: Experiential learning; leisure setting; botanic garden; educational learning environmentISSN: 2398-4287© 2017. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

scholarly journals Comparison of AR and physical experiential learning environment in supporting product innovation

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 184797901983957
Author(s):  
Ying-Chieh Liu ◽  
Su-Ju Lu ◽  
Ching-Yu Kao ◽  
Leanne Chung ◽  
Kim Hua Tan
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Product Innovation ◽  
Domain Knowledge ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Smart Devices ◽  
Innovation Capability ◽  
Learning Aids ◽  
Is Design

This article compares how virtual and physical learning aids enhance learners’ product innovation capability, that is, design experiences and domain knowledge. The virtual aid utilises augmented reality (AR) allowing learners to experience a range of animated mechanisms using smart devices. The legacy physical aid mechanisms were made using three-dimensional printers. We studied the effects of both manipulatives on learners’ understanding of mechanical movements, for example, rack and pinion, and Geneva mechanism. To investigate learning impact of each aid, we compared the experimental results derived from two learners groups (13 participants each). This study provides a case to support product innovation education under an experiential learning environment. The outcomes showed that both aids were useful in enhancing design experiences and domain knowledge. Pre-and-post attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction motivation of both aids was found to be similar. However, distinctive differences were observed in terms of divergent search for ideation, suggesting for further research in combining both aids. We also found that learners’ learning motivation is lower in AR-based aid.

scholarly journals Designing an Experiential Learning Environment for Logistics and Systems Engineering

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 1082-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Bodner ◽  
Jon P. Wade ◽  
William R. Watson ◽  
George I. Kamberov
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Systems Engineering
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document