Cognitive impairment measured by event-related potentials during early and late postoperative period following intravenous or inhalation anaesthesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Holečková ◽  
Jakub Kletečka ◽  
David Štěpánek ◽  
Slavomír Žídek ◽  
David Bludovský ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 109 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Shelley-Tremblay ◽  
Joshua C. Eyer ◽  
Benjamin D. Hill

Symptom exaggeration and feigned cognitive impairment occur commonly in forensic and medicolegal evaluations. As a result, methods to detect feigned cognitive impairment are an indispensable component of neuropsychological assessments. This study reports the results of two neurophysiological experiments using a forced-choice recognition task built from the stimuli of the Word Memory Test and Medical Symptom Validity Test as well as a new linguistically informed stimulus set. Participant volunteers were instructed either to do their best or to feign cognitive impairment consistent with a mild traumatic brain injury while their brain activity was monitored using event-related potentials (ERP). Experiment 1 varied instructions across individuals, whereas Experiment 2 varied instructions within individuals. The target brain component was a positive deflection indicating stimulus recognition that occurs approximately 300 ms after exposure to a stimulus (i.e., the P300). Multimodal comparison (P300 amplitude to behavioral accuracy) allowed the detection of feigned cognitive impairment. Results indicate that, for correct responses, P300s were equivalent for the simulated malingering and good effort conditions. However, for incorrect responses, feigned impairment produced reliable but significantly reduced P300 amplitudes. Although the P300 is an automatic index of recognition—even when knowledge is hidden—its amplitude appears capable of modulation by feigning strategies. Implications of this finding are discussed for research and clinical applications.


2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J Gibson ◽  
Xenophon Voukelatos ◽  
David Ames ◽  
Leon Flicker ◽  
Robert D Helme

BACKGROUND: Pain perception is known to depend on integrated cognitive processing. Alzheimer's disease affects 5% to 10% of older adults, but the impact of this disease on pain sensitivity and report has yet to be fully investigated.AIM OF INVESTIGATION: The present study examined pain threshold, the reliability of pain report and the central nervous system processing of noxious input, as indexed by cerebral event-related potentials (CERP).METHODS: Carbon dioxide laser detection and heat pain thresholds were determined on the hand dorsum of 15 healthy older adults (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score 29.9±0.3) and 15 persons with cognitive impairment (MMSE score 12.7±6.1). Using an array of 15 silver/silver chloride scalp electrodes, the CERP and subjective rating of stimulus intensity were recorded after fixed intensity, 25 W laser stimuli.RESULTS: Compared with age-matched controls, the detection threshold for just noticeable sensation was significantly increased in elderly adults suffering from Alzheimer's disease. There was no difference in pain threshold intensity between persons with cognitive impairment and controls, although the former group was less reliable in reporting detection and pain threshold sensations. The subjective rating of a 25 W stimulus was virtually identical in both groups, and the amplitude of the major CERP component (P400) was similar; however, cognitively impaired adults exhibited a significant increase in the latency of the P400 response.CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that pain perception in response to an acute heat pain stimulus is not diminished in older persons with cognitive impairment. Patients with Alzheimer's disease may be slightly less reliable in threshold pain report, although the subjective rating of evoked pain and the level of poststimulus cortical activation following noxious stimulation were found to be similar to those of controls. A longer latency of the CERP may suggest slower cortical processing of nociceptive input by persons with Alzheimer's disease.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Paitel ◽  
Marielle R. Samii ◽  
Kristy A Nielson

This systematic review examined whether event-related potentials (ERPs) during higher cognitive processing can detect subtle, early signs of neurodegenerative disease. Original, empirical studies retrieved from PsycINFO and PubMed were reviewed if they analyzed patterns in cognitive ERPs (150ms post-stimulus) differentiating mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), or cognitively intact elders who carry AD risk through the Apolipoprotein-E ε4 allele (ε4+) from healthy older adult controls (HC). The 100 studies meeting inclusion criteria (MCI=47; AD=47; ε4+=6) analyzed N200, P300, N400, and occasionally, later components. While there was variability across studies, patterns of reduced amplitude and delayed latency were apparent in pathological aging, consistent with AD-related brain atrophy and cognitive impairment. These effects were particularly evident in advanced disease progression (i.e., AD > MCI) and in later ERP components measured during complex tasks. Although ERP studies in intact ε4+ elders are thus far scarce, a similar pattern of delayed latency was notable, along with a contrasting pattern of increased amplitude, consistent with compensatory neural activation. This limited work suggests ERPs might be able to index early neural changes indicative of future cognitive decline in otherwise healthy elders. As ERPs are also accessible and affordable relative to other neuroimaging methods, their addition to cognitive assessment might substantively enhance early identification and characterization of neural dysfunction, allowing opportunity for earlier differential diagnosis and targeting of intervention. To evaluate this possibility there is urgent need for well-powered studies assessing late cognitive ERPs during complex tasks, particularly in healthy elders at risk for cognitive decline.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Szmyrka ◽  
Anna Pokryszko-Dragan ◽  
Krzysztof Slotwinski ◽  
Ewa Gruszka ◽  
Lucyna Korman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document