Community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department: an algorithm to facilitate diagnosis and guide chest CT scan indication

Purpose Legionnaires' disease (LD) may occur sporadically or in the course of outbreaks, where the typical radiological manifestations of the disease may better be delineated. We took advantage of a rare community-based epidemic of LD (181 patients) that occurred in 2012 in Quebec City, Canada, to describe the radiographic features of LD and compare the its tomographic presentation with that of community-acquired pneumonia caused by common bacteria other than Legionella pneumophila. Methods From the 181 individuals affected in the outbreak, we obtained the chest radiographs of 159 individuals (mean 63 ± 15 years of age) for detailed analysis; 33 patients had a computed tomography (CT) scan performed during the course of their illness. In a case-control study, we compared the CT scans of patients with LD with those of patients who had received a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia caused by a pathogen other than Legionella and confirmed by chest CT scan. Results Overall, LD most often presented as an airspace consolidation involving 1 of the lower lobes. Pleural effusion and mediastinal adenopathies were apparent only in a minority, whereas no pneumothorax or cavitation was noted. We did not find any significant difference in chest CT scan findings in patients with LD vs those with community-acquired pneumonia from other bacterial origin. No radiological finding was clearly associated with an increased risk of intensive care unit admission or mortality. Conclusions The early radiographic and tomographic manifestations of LD are nonspecific and similar to those found in community-acquired pneumonia from other bacterial origin.

Download Full-text

Detecting Covid-19 and Community Acquired Pneumonia Using Chest CT Scan Images With Deep Learning

ICASSP 2021 - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) ◽

10.1109/icassp39728.2021.9414007 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Shubham Chaudhary ◽

Sadbhawna Sadbhawna ◽

Vinit Jakhetiya ◽

Badri N Subudhi ◽

Ujjwal Baid ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Deep Learning ◽

Ct Scan ◽

Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Chest Ct Scan

Download Full-text

Lung ultrasound in the emergency department - a valuable tool in the management of patients presenting with respiratory symptoms during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

BMC Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1186/s12873-020-00389-w ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Bonaventura Schmid ◽

Doreen Feuerstein ◽

Corinna N. Lang ◽

Katrin Fink ◽

Rebecca Steger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Ct Scan ◽

Lung Ultrasound ◽

Care Center ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Clinical Information ◽

Clinical Work ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Work Up ◽

Chest Ct Scan

Abstract Background Typical lung ultrasound (LUS) findings in patients with a COVID-19 infection were reported early on. During the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, LUS was propagated as a useful instrument in triage and monitoring. We evaluated LUS as a rapid diagnostic triage tool for the management of patients with suspected COVID-19 in the emergency department (ED). Methods The study retrospectively enrolled patients with suspected COVID-19, who were admitted from 1st April to 25th of April 2020 to the ED of a tertiary care center in Germany. During clinical work-up, patients underwent LUS and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for SARS-CoV-2. The recorded ultrasound findings were analyzed and judged regarding typical signs of viral pneumonia, blinded for clinical information of the patients. The results were compared with PCR test and chest computed tomography (CT). Results 2236 patients were treated in the ED during the study period. 203 were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using PCR, 135 (66.5%) underwent LUS and 39 (28.9%) of the patients were examined by chest CT scan. 39 (28.9%) of the 135 patients were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with PCR. In 52 (38.5%) COVID-19 was suspected from the finding of the LUS, resulting in a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 77.1% compared with PCR results. The negative predictive value reached 89.2%. The findings of the LUS had - compared to a positive chest CT scan for COVID-19 - a sensitivity of 70.6% and a specificity of 72.7%. Conclusions LUS is a rapid and useful triage tool in the work-up of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection during a pandemic scenario. Still, the results of the LUS depend on the physician’s experience and skills.

Download Full-text

Cancer surgery during the COVID‐19 pandemic: The experience of a comprehensive cancer center performing preoperative screening by RT‐PCR and chest CT scan

Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1002/jso.26335 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 123 (4) ◽

pp. 815-822

Author(s):

Joanne Guerlain ◽

Fabienne Haroun ◽

Alexandra Voicu ◽

Charles Honoré ◽

Franck Griscelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ct Scan ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Cancer Surgery ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Preoperative Screening ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Chest Ct Scan

Download Full-text

A meta-analysis of accuracy and sensitivity of chest CT and RT-PCR in COVID-19 diagnosis

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-020-80061-2 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Fatemeh Khatami ◽

Mohammad Saatchi ◽

Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh ◽

Zahra Sadat Aghamir ◽

Alireza Namazi Shabestari ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Reverse Transcriptase ◽

Ct Scan ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Chain Reaction ◽

Polymerase Chain ◽

Chest Ct Scan

AbstractNowadays there is an ongoing acute respiratory outbreak caused by the novel highly contagious coronavirus (COVID-19). The diagnostic protocol is based on quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and chests CT scan, with uncertain accuracy. This meta-analysis study determines the diagnostic value of an initial chest CT scan in patients with COVID-19 infection in comparison with RT-PCR. Three main databases; PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and EMBASE were systematically searched for all published literature from January 1st, 2019, to the 21st May 2020 with the keywords "COVID19 virus", "2019 novel coronavirus", "Wuhan coronavirus", "2019-nCoV", "X-Ray Computed Tomography", "Polymerase Chain Reaction", "Reverse Transcriptase PCR", and "PCR Reverse Transcriptase". All relevant case-series, cross-sectional, and cohort studies were selected. Data extraction and analysis were performed using STATA v.14.0SE (College Station, TX, USA) and RevMan 5. Among 1022 articles, 60 studies were eligible for totalizing 5744 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of chest CT scan compared to RT-PCR were 87% (95% CI 85–90%), 46% (95% CI 29–63%), 69% (95% CI 56–72%), and 89% (95% CI 82–96%), respectively. It is important to rely on the repeated RT-PCR three times to give 99% accuracy, especially in negative samples. Regarding the overall diagnostic sensitivity of 87% for chest CT, the RT-PCR testing is essential and should be repeated to escape misdiagnosis.

Download Full-text

The role of CT imaging for management of COVID-19 in epidemic area: early experience from a University Hospital

Insights into Imaging ◽

10.1186/s13244-020-00957-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Vikram rao Bollineni ◽

Koenraad Hans Nieboer ◽

Seema Döring ◽

Nico Buls ◽

Johan de Mey

Keyword(s):

Ct Scan ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Ct Imaging ◽

Chest Ct ◽

University Hospital ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Ct Findings ◽

Epidemic Area ◽

Chest Ct Scan ◽

Pcr Test

Abstract Background To evaluate the clinical value of the chest CT scan compared to the reference standard real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in COVID-19 patients. Methods From March 29th to April 15th of 2020, a total of 240 patients with respiratory distress underwent both a low-dose chest CT scan and RT-PCR tests. The performance of chest CT in diagnosing COVID-19 was assessed with reference to the RT-PCR result. Two board-certified radiologists (mean 24 years of experience chest CT), blinded for the RT-PCR result, reviewed all scans and decided positive or negative chest CT findings by consensus. Results Out of 240 patients, 60% (144/240) had positive RT-PCR results and 89% (213/240) had a positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 were 100% (95% CI: 97–100%, 144/240), 28% (95% CI: 19–38%, 27/240), 68% (95% CI: 65–70%) and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the chest CT suggesting COVID-19 was 71% (95% CI: 65–77%). Thirty-three patients with positive chest CT scan and negative RT-PCR test at baseline underwent repeat RT-PCR assay. In this subgroup, 21.2% (7/33) cases became RT-PCR positive. Conclusion Chest CT imaging has high sensitivity and high NPV for diagnosing COVID-19 and can be considered as an alternative primary screening tool for COVID-19 in epidemic areas. In addition, a negative RT-PCR test, but positive CT findings can still be suggestive of COVID-19 infection.

Download Full-text