scholarly journals Artificial intelligence-based image classification methods for diagnosis of skin cancer: Challenges and opportunities

2020 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 104065
Author(s):  
Manu Goyal ◽  
Thomas Knackstedt ◽  
Shaofeng Yan ◽  
Saeed Hassanpour
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Image Classification ◽  
Classification Methods ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities

scholarly journals Quantum Enhanced Filter: QFilter

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parfait Atchade ◽  
Guillermo Alonso-Linaje
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Classification ◽  
Convolutional Neural Networks ◽  
Classification Model ◽  
Classification Methods ◽  
Convolutional Networks ◽  
Classical Computing

Abstract Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) are used mainly to treat problems with many images characteristic of Deep Learning. In this work, we propose a hybrid image classification model to take advantage of quantum and classical computing. The method will use the potential that convolutional networks have shown in artificial intelligence by replacing classical filters with variational quantum filters. Similarly, this work will compare with other classification methods and the system's execution on different servers. The algorithm's quantum feasibility is modelled and tested on Amazon Braket Notebook instances and experimented on the Pennylane's philosophy and framework.

Automated Skin Cancer Detection Web-Based Application and Review of Some Image Classification Algorithm

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddhesh Bhojane ◽  
Krishna Shrestha ◽  
Sanghmitra Bharadwaj ◽  
Ritul Yadav ◽  
Fenil Ribinwala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Image Classification ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Classification Algorithm ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Skin Cancer Detection

The Power of Matrix Factorization: Methods for Deconvoluting Genetic Heterogeneous Data at Expression Level

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 841-853
Author(s):  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Zhining Wen ◽  
Menglong Li
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Matrix Factorization ◽  
In Silico ◽  
Genetic Data ◽  
Heterogeneous Data ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Mathematical Methods ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Factorization Methods ◽  
Genetic Profiles

Background:: The utilization of genetic data to investigate biological problems has recently become a vital approach. However, it is undeniable that the heterogeneity of original samples at the biological level is usually ignored when utilizing genetic data. Different cell-constitutions of a sample could differentiate the expression profile, and set considerable biases for downstream research. Matrix factorization (MF) which originated as a set of mathematical methods, has contributed massively to deconvoluting genetic profiles in silico, especially at the expression level. Objective: With the development of artificial intelligence algorithms and machine learning, the number of computational methods for solving heterogeneous problems is also rapidly abundant. However, a structural view from the angle of using MF to deconvolute genetic data is quite limited. This study was conducted to review the usages of MF methods on heterogeneous problems of genetic data on expression level. Methods: MF methods involved in deconvolution were reviewed according to their individual strengths. The demonstration is presented separately into three sections: application scenarios, method categories and summarization for tools. Specifically, application scenarios defined deconvoluting problem with applying scenarios. Method categories summarized MF algorithms contributed to different scenarios. Summarization for tools listed functions and developed web-servers over the latest decade. Additionally, challenges and opportunities of relative fields are discussed. Results and Conclusion: Based on the investigation, this study aims to present a relatively global picture to assist researchers to achieve a quicker access of deconvoluting genetic data in silico, further to help researchers in selecting suitable MF methods based on the different scenarios.

Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: A Scoping Review (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulrahman Takiddin ◽  
Jens Schneider ◽  
Yin Yang ◽  
Alaa Abd-Alrazaq ◽  
Mowafa Househ
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Evaluation Metrics ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Computer Algorithms ◽  
Scoping Reviews

BACKGROUND Skin cancer is the most common cancer type affecting humans. Traditional skin cancer diagnosis methods are costly, require a professional physician, and take time. Hence, to aid in diagnosing skin cancer, Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are being used, including shallow and deep machine learning-based techniques that are trained to detect and classify skin cancer using computer algorithms and deep neural networks. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to identify and group the different types of AI-based technologies used to detect and classify skin cancer. The study also examines the reliability of the selected papers by studying the correlation between the dataset size and number of diagnostic classes with the performance metrics used to evaluate the models. METHODS We conducted a systematic search for articles using IEEE Xplore, ACM DL, and Ovid MEDLINE databases following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The study included in this scoping review had to fulfill several selection criteria; to be specifically about skin cancer, detecting or classifying skin cancer, and using AI technologies. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Extracted data were synthesized narratively, where studies were grouped based on the diagnostic AI techniques and their evaluation metrics. RESULTS We retrieved 906 papers from the 3 databases, but 53 studies were eligible for this review. While shallow techniques were used in 14 studies, deep techniques were utilized in 39 studies. The studies used accuracy (n=43/53), the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (n=5/53), sensitivity (n=3/53), and F1-score (n=2/53) to assess the proposed models. Studies that use smaller datasets and fewer diagnostic classes tend to have higher reported accuracy scores. CONCLUSIONS The adaptation of AI in the medical field facilitates the diagnosis process of skin cancer. However, the reliability of most AI tools is questionable since small datasets or low numbers of diagnostic classes are used. In addition, a direct comparison between methods is hindered by a varied use of different evaluation metrics and image types.

AI-Provided Instant Differential Diagnosis of Pemphigus Vulgaris and Bullous Pemphigoid: Qualitative Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyu He ◽  
Juan Su ◽  
Guangyu Wang ◽  
Kang Zhang ◽  
Navarini Alexander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Image Classification ◽  
Bullous Pemphigoid ◽  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Pemphigus Vulgaris ◽  
Classification Model ◽  
Clinical Image ◽  
Clinical Images ◽  
Multimodal Classification

BACKGROUND Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and bullous pemphigoid (BP) are two rare but severe inflammatory dermatoses. Due to the regional lack of trained dermatologists, many patients with these two diseases are misdiagnosed and therefore incorrectly treated. An artificial intelligence diagnosis framework would be highly adaptable for the early diagnosis of these two diseases. OBJECTIVE Design and evaluate an artificial intelligence diagnosis framework for PV and BP. METHODS The work was conducted on a dermatological dataset consisting of 17,735 clinical images and 346 patient metadata of bullous dermatoses. A two-stage diagnosis framework was designed, where the first stage trained a clinical image classification model to classify bullous dermatoses from five common skin diseases and normal skin and the second stage developed a multimodal classification model of clinical images and patient metadata to further differentiate PV and BP. RESULTS The clinical image classification model and the multimodal classification model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.998 and 0.942, respectively. On the independent test set of 20 PV and 20 BP cases, our multimodal classification model (sensitivity: 0.85, specificity: 0.95) performed better than the average of 27 junior dermatologists (sensitivity: 0.68, specificity: 0.78) and comparable to the average of 69 senior dermatologists (sensitivity: 0.80, specificity: 0.87). CONCLUSIONS Our diagnosis framework based on clinical images and patient metadata achieved expert-level identification of PV and BP, and is potential to be an effective tool for dermatologists in remote areas in the early diagnosis of these two diseases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document