Determination of pitting sensitivity of the aluminium alloy EN AW-6060-T6 in a carbon-fibre reinforced plastic/aluminium rivet joint by finite element simulation of the galvanic corrosion process

2013 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 172-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Mandel ◽  
Lutz Krüger
2020 ◽  
pp. 147592172094643
Author(s):  
Claudia Barile ◽  
Caterina Casavola ◽  
Giovanni Pappalettera ◽  
Vimalathithan Paramsamy Kannan

In this research work, the acoustic emission results obtained from testing double cantilever beam specimens with carbon fibre reinforced plastic laminates are analysed. The acoustic emission descriptors such as amplitude, frequency centroid, counts, duration and risetime are clustered using k-means++ algorithm. An unconventional and innovative way of using the acoustic emission descriptors, after the clustering, is introduced. This method can favourably be used for relating the different damage progression modes in fibre reinforced plastics. Apart from this, the cumulative acoustic energy is used for predicting the crack length of the specimens. The predicted crack length is almost identical to the actual crack length opening recorded in each specimen. Finally, analytical and finite element models are used for validating the experimental results under the mode I delamination. The finite element studies are carried out using cohesive zone modelling in Comsol Multiphysics® platform.


Author(s):  
B. Z. Margolin ◽  
V. I. Kostylev ◽  
E. Keim ◽  
R. Chaouadi

Within the TACIS R2.06/96 project: “Surveillance Program for VVER 1000 Reactors”, sponsored by the European Commission, the local approach of fracture has been applied in the ductile regime. Two different models were applied and compared, namely Tvergaard-Needleman-Gurson versus Prometey model. The main tasks are: • perform special Local Approach experiments on smooth and notched cylindrical specimens; • predict JR-curve on the basis of the ductile fracture models; • compare two models of ductile fracture, namely, the Tvergaard-Needleman-Gurson model and the Prometey model. In this paper, the Tvergaard-Needleman-Gurson and Prometey models are briefly described. The parameters of both models were calibrated by using experimental data obtained on tensile specimens. While only smooth tensile specimens are used to calibrate the Tvergaard-Needleman-Gurson model, notched tensile in addition to smooth tensile specimens are used to calibrate the Prometey model. In the latter, standard smooth tensile specimens are used to determine the mechanical properties (the yield stress σy, the ultimate stress σu, the ultimate elongation δu, the area reduction Z) and notched cylindrical specimens to determine the strain at rupture. The numerical analysis comprises essentially two steps: • Step 1: finite element simulation of the smooth tensile specimen (determination of true stress-strain curve and critical void volume fraction for the Tvergaard-Needleman-Gurson model) and simulation of the notched cylindrical specimen up to rupture (determination of stress triaxiality for the Prometey model); • Step 2: finite element simulation of the 2T CT specimen and determination of the crack resistance behaviour in the ductile regime (J-Δa curve). It is found that both models were able to correctly predict the crack resistance behaviour of the investigated materials. The numerical and the experimental results were in very good agreement. The main difference between the two models is that the required number of calibrated parameters in the Prometey model is less than in the Tvergaard-Needleman-Gurson model but additional tests on notched specimens are required for the Prometey model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document