Chemical kinetic analysis of plasma excited methane combustion

2019 ◽  
Vol 730 ◽  
pp. 399-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibo Wang ◽  
Jinlu Yu ◽  
Weida Cheng ◽  
Yuan Ma ◽  
Runze Zheng ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
G. Arvind Rao ◽  
Yeshayahou Levy ◽  
Ephraim J. Gutmark

Flameless combustion (FC) is one of the most promising techniques of reducing harmful emissions from combustion systems. FC is a combustion phenomenon that takes place at low O2 concentration and high inlet reactant temperature. This unique combination results in a distributed combustion regime with a lower adiabatic flame temperature. The paper focuses on investigating the chemical kinetics of an prototype combustion chamber built at the university of Cincinnati with an aim of establishing flameless regime and demonstrating the applicability of FC to gas turbine engines. A Chemical reactor model (CRM) has been built for emulating the reactions within the combustor. The entire combustion chamber has been divided into appropriate number of Perfectly Stirred Reactors (PSRs) and Plug Flow Reactors (PFRs). The interconnections between these reactors and the residence times of these reactors are based on the PIV studies of the combustor flow field. The CRM model has then been used to predict the combustor emission profile for various equivalence ratios. The results obtained from CRM model show that the emission from the combustor are quite less at low equivalence ratios and have been found to be in reasonable agreement with experimental observations. The chemical kinetic analysis gives an insight on the role of vitiated combustion gases in suppressing the formation of pollutants within the combustion process.


Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 288 ◽  
pp. 119710
Author(s):  
Subhankar Mohapatra ◽  
Subrat Garnayak ◽  
Bok Jik Lee ◽  
Ayman M. Elbaz ◽  
William L. Roberts ◽  
...  

Radio Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 521-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Holmes ◽  
Rainer A. Dressler ◽  
Todd R. Pedersen ◽  
Ronald G. Caton ◽  
Daniel Miller

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramees K. Rahman ◽  
Samuel Barak ◽  
K.R.V. (Raghu) Manikantachari ◽  
Erik Ninnemann ◽  
Ashvin Hosangadi ◽  
...  

Abstract The direct-fired supercritical carbon dioxide cycles are one of the most promising power generation methods in terms of their efficiency and environmental friendliness. Two important challenges in implementing these cycles are the high pressure (300 bar) and high CO2 dilution (>80%) in the combustor. The design and development of supercritical oxy-combustors for natural gas require accurate reaction kinetic models to predict the combustion outcomes. The presence of a small amount of impurities in natural gas and other feed streams to oxy-combustors makes these predictions even more complex. During oxy-combustion, trace amounts of nitrogen present in the oxidizer is converted to NOx and gets into the combustion chamber along with the recirculated CO2. Similarly, natural gas can contain a trace amount of ammonia and sulfurous impurities that get converted to NOx and SOx and get back into the combustion chamber with recirculated CO2. In this work, a reaction model is developed for predicting the effect of impurities such as NOx and SOx on supercritical methane combustion. The base mechanism used in this work is GRI Mech 3.0. H2S combustion chemistry is obtained from Bongartz et al. while NOx chemistry is from Konnov. The reaction model is then optimized for a pressure range of 30–300 bar using high-pressure shock tube data from the literature. It is then validated with data obtained from the literature for methane combustion, H2S oxidation, and NOx effects on ignition delay. The effect of impurities on CH4 combustion up to 16 atm is validated using NOx-doped methane studies obtained from the literature. In order to validate the model for high-pressure conditions, experiments are conducted at the UCF shock tube facility using natural gas identical mixtures with N2O as an impurity at ∼100 bar. Current results show that there is a significant change in ignition delay with the presence of impurities. A comparison is made with experimental data using the developed model and predictions are found to be in good agreement. The model developed was used to study the effect of impurities on CO formation from sCO2 combustors. It was found that NOx helps in reducing CO formation while the presence of H2S results in the formation of more CO. The reaction mechanism developed herein can also be used as a base mechanism to develop reduced mechanisms for use in CFD simulations.


Author(s):  
Owen M. Pryor ◽  
Erik Ninnemann ◽  
Subith Vasu

Abstract Carbon monoxide time-histories and ignition delay times were measured in carbon dioxide diluted methane mixtures behind reflected shockwaves. Experiments were performed around 2 atm for a temperature range between 1650–2000 K. The experiments were performed for a mixture of XCH4 = 0.5%, XO2 = 1.0%, XCO2 = 8.5%, XAr = 90.0%. The mixture was chosen to minimize energy release during the experiment and a minimum of 2 ms was recorded for all experiments. The carbon monoxide time-histories were measured using a tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy technique and measuring the absorbance at two different wavelengths to isolate the impact of carbon monoxide on the absorbance. Carbon monoxide was measured at a wavelength of 4886.94 nm while the interfering species was measured at 4891.17 nm. Each experiment was performed twice, with the pressure and temperature before combustion being matched to within the experimental uncertainty of the two experiments. The ignition delay times were measured using OH* radical emission to determine the time-scales of the experiments. All experiments were compared to detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms that can be found in the literature. The experimental results show that the detailed mechanisms from the literature were able to accurately predict the general profile of the carbon monoxide time-histories but under-predicted maximum concentration of CO being formed at these conditions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 194-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew St. George ◽  
R. Driscoll ◽  
V. Anand ◽  
E. Gutmark

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document