Survival probability of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: Effect of surface condition and fatigue test load profile

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 808-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva ◽  
João Paulo Mendes Tribst ◽  
Andressa Borin Venturini ◽  
Lilian Costa Anami ◽  
Estevam Augusto Bonfante ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Larissa Marcia Martins Alves ◽  
Lisseth Patricia Claudio Contreras ◽  
Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos ◽  
Marco Antonio Bottino ◽  
Luiz Felipe Valandro ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 201 (7) ◽  
pp. 3824-3828 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gil ◽  
V. Shemet ◽  
R. Vassen ◽  
M. Subanovic ◽  
J. Toscano ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
pp. 345-348
Author(s):  
K.A. Thomas ◽  
S.D. Cook ◽  
R.C. Anderson ◽  
E.A. Renz ◽  
A.D. Haubold ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 77 (7) ◽  
pp. 1198-1205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiroh KITAYAMA ◽  
Yoshiaki SHIDA ◽  
Jun'ichiro MURAYAMA

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2012
Author(s):  
Gianmaria D’Addazio ◽  
Manlio Santilli ◽  
Marco Lorenzo Rollo ◽  
Paolo Cardelli ◽  
Imena Rexhepi ◽  
...  

In recent years, Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate ceramic (ZLS), combining lithium-silicate and zirconia features, has shown to have excellent mechanical and aesthetic characteristics. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the fracture strength of ZLS single crowns cemented with two different cementation techniques. Twenty crowns were realised and cemented on teeth replicas achieved from an extracted premolar human tooth. The samples were divided into two groups of 10 specimens each, Glass-ionomeric cement (GIC) group and Self-Adhesive Resin Cement (ARC) group. The mechanical test was performed using a universal testing machine. The specimens were then evaluated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to identify for all crowns and related abutments the pattern of fracture after the breaking point. The data obtained were statistically analysed. The mean fracture toughness values and standard deviations (±SD) were 2227 ± 382 N and 3712 ± 319 N respectively for GIC and ARC groups. In fact, t-test showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001). Moreover, the SEM results demonstrated portions of abutments still attached to the crown fragments in the ARC group, whilst these were not present in the GIC group. Within the limitations of this study, these results suggest the use of adhesive cementation for ZLS crowns, which significantly increase the compressive strength of ZLS restorations compared to GIC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document