Cost saving effects of a short-term educational intervention entailing lower hypoglycaemic event rates in people with type 1 diabetes and lipo-hypertrophy

2018 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 320-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Gentile ◽  
Felice Strollo
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e002035
Author(s):  
Merel M Ruissen ◽  
Hannah Regeer ◽  
Cyril P Landstra ◽  
Marielle Schroijen ◽  
Ingrid Jazet ◽  
...  

IntroductionLockdown measures have a profound effect on many aspects of daily life relevant for diabetes self-management. We assessed whether lockdown measures, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, differentially affect perceived stress, body weight, exercise and related this to glycemic control in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Research design and methodsWe performed a short-term observational cohort study at the Leiden University Medical Center. People with type 1 and type 2 diabetes ≥18 years were eligible to participate. Participants filled out online questionnaires, sent in blood for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) analysis and shared data of their flash or continuous glucose sensors. HbA1c during the lockdown was compared with the last known HbA1c before the lockdown.ResultsIn total, 435 people were included (type 1 diabetes n=280, type 2 diabetes n=155). An increase in perceived stress and anxiety, weight gain and less exercise was observed in both groups. There was improvement in glycemic control in the group with the highest HbA1c tertile (type 1 diabetes: −0.39% (−4.3 mmol/mol) (p<0.0001 and type 2 diabetes: −0.62% (−6.8 mmol/mol) (p=0.0036). Perceived stress was associated with difficulty with glycemic control (p<0.0001).ConclusionsAn increase in perceived stress and anxiety, weight gain and less exercise but no deterioration of glycemic control occurs in both people with relatively well-controlled type 1 and type 2 diabetes during short-term lockdown measures. As perceived stress showed to be associated with glycemic control, this provides opportunities for healthcare professionals to put more emphasis on psychological aspects during diabetes care consultations.


Author(s):  
Elisabeth Mönnig ◽  
Erik Spaepen ◽  
Beatrice Osumili ◽  
Beth D. Mitchell ◽  
Frank Snoek ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A global cross-sectional survey (CRASH) was designed to provide information about the experiences of people with diabetes (PWD) and their caregivers in relation to severe hypoglycaemic events. Methods Adults with type 1 diabetes or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes who had experienced one or more severe hypoglycaemic events within the past 3 years, and adult caregivers for such people, were recruited from medical research panels using purposive sampling. We present here results from Germany. Results Approximately 100 individuals in each of the four participant groups completed a 30-minute online survey. Survey results indicated that the most recent severe hypoglycaemic event made many participants feel scared (80.4%), unprepared (70.4%), and/or helpless (66.5%). Severe hypoglycaemia was discussed by healthcare professionals at every visit with only 20.2% of participants who had ever had this conversation, and 53.5% of participants indicated that their insulin regimen had not changed following their most recent event. 37.1% of PWD/people with diabetes cared for by caregivers owned a glucagon kit at the time of survey completion. Conclusions The survey identified areas for improvement in the prevention and management of severe hypoglycaemic events. For healthcare professionals, these include enquiring more frequently about severe hypoglycaemia and adjusting blood glucose-lowering medication after a severe hypoglycaemic event. For individuals with diabetes and their caregivers, potential improvements include ensuring availability of glucagon at all times. Changes in these areas could lead not only to improved patient wellbeing but also to reduced use of emergency services/hospitalisation and, consequently, lower healthcare costs.


Diabetologia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 2164-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Bernardi ◽  
◽  
M. Rosengård-Bärlund ◽  
A. Sandelin ◽  
V. P. Mäkinen ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 2471-2477 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Nansel ◽  
R. J. Iannotti ◽  
B. G. Simons-Morton ◽  
C. Cox ◽  
L. P. Plotnick ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Broers ◽  
S. Le Cessie ◽  
K. P. Van Vliet ◽  
Ph. Spinhoven ◽  
N. C. W. Van Der Ven ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. e34-e36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Kalscheuer ◽  
Jochen Seufert ◽  
Stefanie Lanzinger ◽  
Joachim Rosenbauer ◽  
Wolfram Karges ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document