Clinical outcomes with long-term sorafenib treatment: A multicenter, real-life study

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. e38
Author(s):  
R. Sacco ◽  
S. Parodi ◽  
T. Zolfino ◽  
C. Saitta ◽  
L. Marzi ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (29) ◽  
pp. 3049-3058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodolfo Sacco ◽  
Alessandro Granito ◽  
Irene Bargellini ◽  
Teresa Zolfino ◽  
Carlo Saitta ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Samy Zaky ◽  
Hossam Hosny ◽  
Gehan Elassal ◽  
Noha Asem ◽  
Amin Abdel Baki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Knowledge about the outcome of COVID-19 on pregnant women is so important. The published literature on the outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 is confusing. The aim of this study was to report our clinical experience about the effect of COVID-19 on pregnant women and to determine whether it was associated with increased mortality or an increase in the need for mechanical ventilation in this special category of patients. Methods This was a cohort study from some isolation hospitals of the Ministry of Health and Population, in eleven governorates, Egypt. The clinical data from the first 64 pregnant women with COVID-19 whose care was managed at some of the Egyptian hospitals from 14 March to 14 June 2020 as well as 114 non-pregnant women with COVID-19 was reviewed. Results The two groups did not show any significant difference regarding the main outcomes of the disease. Two cases in each group needed mechanical ventilation (p 0.617). Three cases (4.7%) died among the pregnant women and two (1.8%) died among the non-pregnant women (p 0.352). Conclusions The main clinical outcomes of COVID-19 were not different between pregnant and non-pregnant women with COVID-19. Based on our findings, pregnancy did not exacerbate the course or mortality of COVID-19 pneumonia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-441
Author(s):  
Daniela Pugliese ◽  
Giuseppe Privitera ◽  
Federica Crispino ◽  
Nicolò Mezzina ◽  
Lucienne Pellegrini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andriana I. Papaioannou ◽  
Myrto Mplizou ◽  
Konstantinos Porpodis ◽  
Evangelia Fouka ◽  
Eleftherios Zervas ◽  
...  

Background: The efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma have been established in both randomized controlled trials and real-life studies. Objective: To evaluate the sustained effectiveness and safety of long-term treatment with omalizumab in a real-world setting. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients treated with omalizumab for at least 8 years in four asthma clinics in Greece. Pulmonary function, asthma control, oral corticosteroids (OCS) dose, and exacerbations were recorded before treatment, 6 months later, and annually thereafter. Adverse events were also recorded. Results: Forty-five patients (66.7% women), mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 55.3 ± 12.2 years, were included. The duration of treatment with omalizumab was 10.6 ± 1.2 years. The annual exacerbation rate decreased from 4.1 before omalizumab initiation to 1.1 after 1 year of treatment and remained low up to the 8th year of treatment (p < 0.001). From the 19 patients who were receiving OCS at baseline, 21.1% patients discontinued after 6 months, 47.4% were still on OCS after 4 years of therapy, and 31.6% were on OCS after 8 years. With regard to the OCS dose, 36.8% of the patients reduced the dose ≥ 50% after 6 months and 68.4% achieved 50% reduction after 2 years. The mean daily OCS dose before omalizumab initiation was 7.8 mg of prednisolone or the equivalent, reduced to 4.7 mg/day after 6 months, which reached 1.6 mg/day after 8 years (p < 0.001). Treatment with omalizumab resulted in significant improvements of asthma control and lung function. No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: In this real-life study, omalizumab resulted in significant and sustained improvements in asthma exacerbations, asthma control, and lung function, and had a steroid sparing effect and a good safety profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document