scholarly journals Propylene glycol, a major electronic cigarette constituent, attenuates the adverse effects of high-dose nicotine as measured by intracranial self-stimulation in rats

2018 ◽  
Vol 193 ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Harris ◽  
Peter Muelken ◽  
Zach Haave ◽  
Yayi Swain ◽  
John R. Smethells ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1631-1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Xiang ◽  
Jian Ni ◽  
Brett Glotzbecker ◽  
Jacob Laubach ◽  
Robert Soiffer ◽  
...  

Introduction For multiple myeloma patients who respond to primary therapy, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is considered standard of care with high-dose melphalan for transplant candidates. There are now two different melphalan formulations available, including a propylene glycol containing (PG-MEL) product and a propylene glycol-free (PG-free MEL) product. Although considered bioequivalent, there remains limited literature directly evaluating the adverse events between the two agents. We seek to assess the tolerability and severity of side effects between the two formulations in a real-life practice setting. Methods A retrospective, descriptive analysis was conducted of multiple myeloma patients who received autologous stem cell conditioning with either melphalan formulation when dosed at 100 mg/m2/dose for two consecutive doses. The primary outcome was the assessment of tolerability and severity of side effects. Tolerability was split into four major categories including hematologic toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, renal toxicity, and highest recorded mucositis grade. Results There were a total of 78 patients who received a melphalan preparation during the study. The median time to myeloablation and neutrophil engraftment was five and seven days post-HSCT, respectively, for all patients. Patients who received PG-free MEL were less likely to develop mucositis, with 22 (56%) reported highest grade 0, defined by World Health Organization oral toxicity scale, compared to those who received PG-MEL (33%), p = 0.04. Conclusion There were minimal differences in tolerability or side effects observed between PG-free MEL and PG-MEL. These data may assist in better understanding the anticipated adverse effects of a high-dose melphalan conditioning therapy.


2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna Kelly ◽  
Robert Conley ◽  
Charles Richardson ◽  
Carol Tamminga ◽  
William Carpenter

Sexologies ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. S78-S79 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Perrone ◽  
F. Armillotta ◽  
G. Formelli ◽  
P. Casadio ◽  
N.C.M. Salfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 678-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric K. Soule ◽  
Aashir Nasim ◽  
Scott Rosas

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110538
Author(s):  
Courtney L. Bradley ◽  
Sara M. McMillin ◽  
Andrew Y. Hwang ◽  
Christina H. Sherrill

Objective To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of high-dose once-weekly semaglutide for chronic weight management. Data Sources PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched (inception to September 8, 2021) using keywords “semaglutide” and “obesity,” “weight,” “high dose,” “high-dose,” or “2.4.” Study Selection and Data Extraction Clinical trials with published results were included. Publications studying the oral or <2.4 mg formulation of semaglutide were excluded. Data Synthesis Four phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials demonstrated efficacy of high-dose once-weekly semaglutide compared with placebo for weight loss. Study populations included patients with overweight or obesity (STEP 1, STEP 3, and STEP 4) or patients with diabetes and with overweight or obesity (STEP 2). Lifestyle interventions for diet and exercise were included for all participants. Weight loss from baseline was significant for all studies, and secondary outcomes demonstrated cardiometabolic improvements including waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and lipid profiles. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were common, but the medication was otherwise well tolerated. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice High-dose semaglutide offers significant weight-lowering potential and favorable effects on cardiometabolic risk factors and glycemic indices. Clinicians and patients should consider the route and frequency of administration, adverse effect profile, and cost when choosing an antiobesity medication. The importance of concomitant lifestyle interventions should be emphasized. Conclusions High-dose once-weekly semaglutide can significantly reduce weight, and although gastrointestinal adverse effects were common, it is generally well tolerated.


1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1018-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
S G Nayfield ◽  
M B Gorin

PURPOSE The oral antiestrogen tamoxifen has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and as adjuvant therapy in early-stage disease. Clinical trials of tamoxifen in chemoprevention of breast cancer among high-risk women have focused attention on potential adverse effects of long-term tamoxifen use, including the possibility of ocular toxicity. This review evaluates the published case reports, clinical series, and clinical trial data on ocular toxicities attributed to tamoxifen. Clinical issues of surveillance, differential diagnosis, and management of tamoxifen-related eye disease are discussed. DESIGN National Library of Medicine online bibliographic services were used to identify case reports and clinical studies of ocular adverse effects that occurred in patients receiving tamoxifen published through the fall of 1994. The medical literature relevant to issues raised by the reports and studies was similarly identified and reviewed. RESULTS Case reports and case series identify crystalline retinal deposits, macular edema, and corneal changes as potential tamoxifen ocular toxicities. Extensive retinal lesions and macular edema with visual impairment have been reported in a few patients receiving high-dose tamoxifen. Less extensive retinal changes may occur in patients receiving low doses for long periods, and isolated retinal crystals may be observed in patients without visual symptoms. CONCLUSION Ocular toxicity is uncommon in the current clinical setting of long-term, low-dose tamoxifen use. Physicians should be aware of the potential for ocular toxicity among patients receiving the drug and should assure appropriate surveillance and prompt evaluation of visual complaints.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document