scholarly journals Recent incarceration and risk of first-time injection initiation assistance: A prospective cohort study of persons who inject drugs

2020 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 107983
Author(s):  
Zachary Bouck ◽  
Sonia Jain ◽  
Xiaoying Sun ◽  
M-J. Milloy ◽  
Dan Werb ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Célia Amorim-Costa ◽  
A. Rita Gaio ◽  
Diogo Ayres-de-Campos ◽  
João Bernardes

AbstractObjective:To compare longitudinal trends of cardiotocographic (CTG) parameters between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and normal fetuses, from 24 to 41 weeks of pregnancy.Methods:A prospective cohort study was carried out in singleton pregnancies without fetal malformations. At least one CTG was performed in each of the following intervals: 24–26 weeks+6 days, 27–29 weeks+6 days, 30–32 weeks+6 days, 33–35 weeks+6 days, 36–38 weeks+6 days and ≥39 weeks. Tracings were analyzed using the Omniview-SisPortoResults:A total of 176 fetuses (31 SGA) and 1256 tracings (207 from SGA fetuses) were evaluated. All CTG parameters changed significantly throughout pregnancy in the three groups, with a decreasing baseline and probability of decelerations, and an increasing average long-term variability (LTV), average short-term variability (STV) and accelerations. Baseline showed a more pronounced decrease (steeper slope) in SGA fetuses, being higher in these cases at earlier gestational ages and lower later in pregnancy. Average LTV was significantly lower in SGA<p3 fetuses, but a parallel increase occurred in all groups. There was a considerable inter-fetal variability within each group.Conclusion:A unique characterization of CTG trends throughout gestation in SGA fetuses was provided. A steeper descent of the baseline was reported for the first time. The findings raise the possibility of clinical application of computerized CTG analysis in screening and management of fetal growth restriction.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 571-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khadeejeh Al dasoqi ◽  
Reema Safadi ◽  
Eman Badran ◽  
Asma Sa’d Basha ◽  
Sue Jordan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Meissner ◽  
Nicola Talsky ◽  
Elisabeth Olliges ◽  
Carmen Jacob ◽  
Oliver J. Stötzer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica M Armitage ◽  
R. Adele H Wang ◽  
Oliver S. P. Davis ◽  
Lucy Bowes ◽  
Claire M. A. Haworth

Abstract Background: Peer victimisation is a common occurrence and has well-established links with a range of psychiatric problems in adulthood. Significantly less is known however, about how victimisation influences positive aspects of mental health such as wellbeing. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess for the first time, whether peer victimisation in adolescence is associated with adult wellbeing. We aimed to understand whether individuals who avoid a diagnosis of depression after victimisation, maintain good wellbeing in later life, and therefore display resilience.Methods: Longitudinal data was taken from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a prospective cohort study based in the UK. Peer victimisation was assessed at 13 years using a modified version of the bullying and friendship interview schedule, and wellbeing at age 23 using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. The presence or absence of depression was diagnosed using the Clinical Interview Schedule–Revised at 18 years. A series of logistic and linear regression analyses were used to explore relationships between peer victimisation, depression, and wellbeing, adjusting for potentially confounding individual and family factors. Results: Just over 15% of victims of frequent bullying had a diagnosis of depression at age 18. Victimisation also had a significant impact on wellbeing, with a one-point increase in frequent victimisation associated with a 2.71-point (SE=0.46, p<0.001) decrease in wellbeing scores aged 23. This finding remained after adjustment for the mediating and moderating effects of depression, suggesting that the burden of victimisation extends beyond depression to impact wellbeing. Results therefore show that individuals who remain partially resilient by avoiding a diagnosis of depression after victimisation have significantly poorer wellbeing than their non-victimised counterparts.Conclusion: Overall, our study demonstrates for the first time that victimisation during adolescence is a significant risk factor for not only the onset of depression, but also poor wellbeing in adulthood. Such findings highlight the importance of investigating both dimensions of mental health to understand the true burden of victimisation and subsequent resilience. In addition to the need for interventions that reduce the likelihood of depression following adolescent victimisation, efforts should also be made to promote good wellbeing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica M. Armitage ◽  
R. Adele H. Wang ◽  
Oliver S. P. Davis ◽  
Lucy Bowes ◽  
Claire M. A. Haworth

Abstract Background Peer victimisation is a common occurrence and has well-established links with a range of psychiatric problems in adulthood. Significantly less is known however, about how victimisation influences positive aspects of mental health such as wellbeing. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess for the first time, whether peer victimisation in adolescence is associated with adult wellbeing. We aimed to understand whether individuals who avoid a diagnosis of depression after victimisation, maintain good wellbeing in later life, and therefore display resilience. Methods Longitudinal data was taken from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a prospective cohort study based in the UK. Peer victimisation was assessed at 13 years using a modified version of the bullying and friendship interview schedule, and wellbeing at age 23 using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. The presence or absence of depression was diagnosed using the Clinical Interview Schedule–Revised at 18 years. A series of logistic and linear regression analyses were used to explore relationships between peer victimisation, depression, and wellbeing, adjusting for potentially confounding individual and family factors. Results Just over 15% of victims of frequent bullying had a diagnosis of depression at age 18. Victimisation also had a significant impact on wellbeing, with a one-point increase in frequent victimisation associated with a 2.71-point (SE = 0.46, p < 0.001) decrease in wellbeing scores aged 23. This finding remained after adjustment for the mediating and moderating effects of depression, suggesting that the burden of victimisation extends beyond depression to impact wellbeing. Results therefore show that individuals who remain partially resilient by avoiding a diagnosis of depression after victimisation have significantly poorer wellbeing than their non-victimised counterparts. Conclusion Overall, our study demonstrates for the first time that victimisation during adolescence is a significant risk factor for not only the onset of depression, but also poor wellbeing in adulthood. Such findings highlight the importance of investigating both dimensions of mental health to understand the true burden of victimisation and subsequent resilience. In addition to the need for interventions that reduce the likelihood of depression following adolescent victimisation, efforts should also be made to promote good wellbeing.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 2370-2376 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Vilà-Canet ◽  
A. Covaro ◽  
A. García de Frutos ◽  
M. T. Ubierna ◽  
S. Rodríguez-Alabau ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document