scholarly journals Phase I Trial of Intrathecal Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Neural Progenitors in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

EBioMedicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Violaine K. Harris ◽  
James Stark ◽  
Tamara Vyshkina ◽  
Leslie Blackshear ◽  
Gloria Joo ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 205521731876528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M Planchon ◽  
Karen T Lingas ◽  
Jane Reese Koç ◽  
Brittney M Hooper ◽  
Basabi Maitra ◽  
...  

Background Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory, neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system for which therapeutic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation is under study. Published experience of culture-expanding multiple sclerosis patients’ mesenchymal stem cells for clinical trials is limited. Objective To determine the feasibility of culture-expanding multiple sclerosis patients’ mesenchymal stem cells for clinical use. Methods In a phase I trial, autologous, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells were isolated from 25 trial participants with multiple sclerosis and eight matched controls, and culture-expanded to a target single dose of 1–2 × 106 cells/kg. Viability, cell product identity and sterility were assessed prior to infusion. Cytogenetic stability was assessed by single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from 18 multiple sclerosis patients and five controls. Results One patient failed screening. Mesenchymal stem cell culture expansion was successful for 24 of 25 multiple sclerosis patients and six of eight controls. The target dose was achieved in 16–62 days, requiring two to three cell passages. Growth rate and culture success did not correlate with demographic or multiple sclerosis disease characteristics. Cytogenetic studies identified changes on one chromosome of one control (4.3%) after extended time in culture. Conclusion Culture expansion of mesenchymal stem cells from multiple sclerosis patients as donors is feasible. However, culture time should be minimized for cell products designated for therapeutic administration.


Brain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panayiota Petrou ◽  
Ibrahim Kassis ◽  
Netta Levin ◽  
Friedemann Paul ◽  
Yael Backner ◽  
...  

Abstract In this study (trial registration: NCT02166021), we aimed to evaluate the optimal way of administration, the safety and the clinical efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation in patients with active and progressive multiple sclerosis. Forty-eight patients (28 males and 20 females) with progressive multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale: 3.0–6.5, mean : 5.6 ± 0.8, mean age: 47.5 ± 12.3) and evidence of either clinical worsening or activity during the previous year, were enrolled (between 2015 and 2018). Patients were randomized into three groups and treated intrathecally (IT) or intravenously (IV) with autologous MSCs (1 × 106/kg) or sham injections. After 6 months, half of the patients from the MSC-IT and MSC-IV groups were retreated with MSCs, and the other half with sham injections. Patients initially assigned to sham treatment were divided into two subgroups and treated with either MSC-IT or MSC-IV. The study duration was 14 months. No serious treatment-related safety issues were detected. Significantly fewer patients experienced treatment failure in the MSC-IT and MSC-IV groups compared with those in the sham-treated group (6.7%, 9.7%, and 41.9%, respectively, P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0008). During the 1-year follow-up, 58.6% and 40.6% of patients treated with MSC-IT and MSC-IV, respectively, exhibited no evidence of disease activity compared with 9.7% in the sham-treated group (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0048, respectively). MSC-IT transplantation induced additional benefits on the relapse rate, on the monthly changes of the T2 lesion load on MRI, and on the timed 25-foot walking test, 9-hole peg test, optical coherence tomography, functional MRI and cognitive tests. Treatment with MSCs was well-tolerated in progressive multiple sclerosis and induced short-term beneficial effects regarding the primary end points, especially in the patients with active disease. The intrathecal administration was more efficacious than the intravenous in several parameters of the disease. A phase III trial is warranted to confirm these findings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 407-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandana Mohyeddin Bonab ◽  
Mohammad Ali Sahraian ◽  
Aida Aghsaie ◽  
Sanaz Ahmadi Karvigh ◽  
Seyed Massoud Hosseinian ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Dozois ◽  
Amy L. Lightner ◽  
Kellie L. Mathis ◽  
Heidi K. Chua ◽  
Scott R. Kelley ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document