scholarly journals Variations in mineralization potential for CO2 related to sedimentary facies and burial depth – a comparative study from the North Sea

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 5063-5070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Sundal ◽  
Helge Hellevang ◽  
Rohaldin Miri ◽  
Henning Dypvik ◽  
Johan Petter Nystuen ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Kowalski ◽  
Olaf Dellwig ◽  
Melanie Beck ◽  
Maik Grunwald ◽  
Claus-Dieter Dürselen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 445-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silje S. Skarpeid ◽  
James M. Churchill ◽  
Jamie P. J. Hilton ◽  
Chris N. Izatt ◽  
Matthew T. Poole

AbstractThe Knarr Field is located in the northern Norwegian North Sea, beyond the Brent Group delta fairway. Knarr was discovered in 2008 with the Jordbær well, additional resources were added to the field in 2011 with the successful Jordbær Vest well. The field extends over an area of approximately 20 km2. The original oil in place is estimated to be 26 MSm3 (163 MBBL). The reservoir is the Late Pliensbachian Cook Formation and its current burial depth is approximately −3700 m true vertical depth subsea (TVDSS). In Knarr, the Cook Formation is split into five sandstones that are separated by four shale intervals which can be correlated across the field. The three lower sands (Lower Cook) are interpreted to have been deposited in a tidally-dominated environment, while the upper two sandstones (Upper Cook) were deposited in a wave-dominated shallow-marine setting. The reservoir properties of the Cook Formation in the Knarr area are remarkably good for a reservoir at this depth, with porosities up to 28% and permeabilities in excess of 1 D. The good reservoir properties are the result of grain-coating chlorite, which has inhibited diagenetic quartz development. The field is developed with three oil producers and three water injectors produced via a floating production storage and offloading vessel (FPSO). First oil was achieved in March 2015.


1957 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Spiegel

The National Research Council's Committee on Disaster Studies sent us to England about two weeks after the North Sea flood of February 1, 1953, to set up a rather extensive comparative study of the flood's effects in several communities. Unfortunately, the larger study did not materialize and we were compelled to learn what we could by ourselves in about two weeks. The following report, therefore, must be regarded as very tentative. It deals with Kimbark1, one of the two flooded communities we were able to study.


Clay Minerals ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Huggett ◽  
H. F. Shaw

AbstractThe use of field emission electron microscopy for the study of clay mineral petrography in mudrocks and sandstones is discussed. The methodology including sample preparation is outlined and three examples of the application of the technique are described: the formation of authigenic illite in mudrocks, the multiple generation of authigenic illites in sandstones and the effects of KCl drilling muds on shale fabrics. In the study of authigenic illite formation in Palaeocene mudrocks from the North Sea, the FESEM analyses have demonstrated the formation of illites with increasing burial depth that conventional SEM and XRD analyses had failed to show. The FESEM analyses of the authigenic illites in Carboniferous sandstones from the southern North Sea revealed at least three different habits representing different generation episodes rather than one illite formation event.This has important repercussions with regard to the interpretation of stable isotope and dating data for the illites. Significant petrographic changes in shales after treatment with KCl drilling muds have been observed from FESEM analyses, suggesting reactivity between the shales and the KCl muds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document