scholarly journals Cost-optimal Sizing of Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems for the Heating and Cooling Needs of a Nearly Zero-energy Building: Design Methodology and Model Description

2016 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 517-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Testi ◽  
Eva Schito ◽  
Paolo Conti
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 5201
Author(s):  
Kittisak Lohwanitchai ◽  
Daranee Jareemit

The concept of a zero energy building is a significant sustainable strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The challenges of zero energy building (ZEB) achievement in Thailand are that the design approach to reach ZEB in office buildings is unclear and inconsistent. In addition, its implementation requires a relatively high investment cost. This study proposes a guideline for cost-optimal design to achieve the ZEB for three representative six-story office buildings in hot and humid Thailand. The energy simulations of envelope designs incorporating high-efficiency systems are carried out using eQuest and daylighting simulation using DIALux evo. The final energy consumptions meet the national ZEB target but are higher than the rooftop PV generation. To reduce such an energy gap, the ratios of building height to width are proposed. The cost-benefit of investment in ZEB projects provides IRRs ranging from 10.73 to 13.85%, with payback periods of 7.2 to 8.5 years. The energy savings from the proposed designs account for 79.2 to 81.6% of the on-site energy use. The investment of high-performance glazed-windows in the small office buildings is unprofitable (NPVs = −14.77–−46.01). These research results could help architects and engineers identify the influential parameters and significant considerations for the ZEB design. Strategies and technical support to improve energy performance in large and mid-rise buildings towards ZEB goals associated with the high investment cost need future investigations.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazaros Aresti ◽  
Paul Christodoulides ◽  
Georgios A. Florides

<p>Shallow Geothermal Energy, a Renewable Energy Source, finds application through Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs) for space heating/cooling via tubes directed into the ground. There are two main categories of Ground Heat Exchanger (GHE) types: the horizontal and the vertical types. Ground Heat Exchangers (GHEs) of various configurations, extract or reject heat into the ground. Even though GSHP have higher performance in comparison to the Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs), the systems high initial costs and long payback period have made it unattractive as an investment. GSHP systems can also be utilized in the buildings foundation in the form of Thermo-Active Structure (TAS) systems or Energy Geo-Structures (EGS), with applications such as energy piles, barrette piles, diaphragm walls, shallow foundations, retaining walls, embankments, and tunnel linings. Energy piles are reinforced concrete foundations with geothermal pipes, whereby the buildings foundations are utilized to provide space heating and cooling. Apart from energy piles, another EGS system can be achieved by the incorporation of the building’s foundation bed as a GHE. Foundation piles are not required in all constructions, but a building’s foundation bed is mandatory. This configuration is still based on the principles of the energy pile.</p><p>Energy piles have yet to be applied in Cyprus and, thus, a preliminary assessment considered and investigated before application would be useful. The potential of the GSHP systems by utilizing the building’s foundation through energy piles is considered here, for a moderate climate such as Cyprus, towards a Zero Energy Building. Typical foundation piles geometry in Cyprus consists of a 10m depth, a 0.4m diameter and reinforced concrete as a grout material, which is used at the foundation bed of the building. A typical dwelling in Cyprus is selected to be numerically modelled in this study. It is a three-bedroom, two-storey house with a 190m<sup>2</sup> total floor area, matching the thermal characteristics of a Zero Energy Building (i.e., U-values of 0.4W/m<sup>2</sup>/K on all walls and ceiling and 2.25 W/m<sup>2</sup>/K on all doors and windows, respectively). A full-scale model is developed in COMSOL Multiphysics software, to examine the energy rejected or absorbed into the ground by taking the heating and cooling loads of the typical dwelling in Cyprus. The convection-diffusion equation for heat transfer is used with the three-dimensional conservation of heat transfer for an incompressible fluid on all domains except the pipes, where a simplified equation is used. Different months in winter and summer are accounted for the simulations and the fluid-in – fluid-out temperature difference is presented. Finally, an economic evaluation of the systems examined above is presented, in order to check its viability. It is concluded that utilizing the dwelling’s foundations can be a better investment than using GHEs in boreholes.</p>


Author(s):  
Giulia Spiridigliozzi ◽  
Laura Pompei ◽  
Cristina Cornaro ◽  
Livio De Santoli ◽  
Fabio Bisegna

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 4099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rokas Tamašauskas ◽  
Jolanta Šadauskienė ◽  
Dorota Anna Krawczyk ◽  
Violeta Medelienė

Following a new climate and energy plan, the European Union (EU) gives big attention to energy savings. The overall assessment of energy saving measures is very important. Thus, it is crucial to estimate in a proper way the primary energy factor, which is used in calculations of primary energy consumption from renewable energy (RE) sources in a Nearly Zero Energy Building (NZEB). The conduced studies of the literature and national regulations showed that different methods to determine energy from photovoltaic (PV) systems are used. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the primary energy factors of energy from photovoltaics and determine the average value. To achieve this aim, the data of 30 photovoltaic systems from Lithuania were analyzed. The results show a 35% diversification in the values of non-renewable primary energy factor, depending on the PV systems’ capacities, with the average on a level of 1.038.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 2-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shady Attia ◽  
Elisabeth Gratia ◽  
André De Herde ◽  
Jan L.M. Hensen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saunak Shukla ◽  
Jeremy Lytle ◽  
Kevin Kai Ye ◽  
Wey Leong ◽  
Alan Fung

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nimish Biloria ◽  
Nastaran Abdollahzadeh

Considering the 2021 IPCC report that justly attributes our deteriorating climatic condition to human doing, the need to develop nearly zero energy building (nZEB) practices is gaining urgency. However, rather than the typical focus on developing greenfield net-zero initiatives, retrofitting underperforming buildings could create significant scale climate positive impacts faster. The chapter accordingly discusses energy-efficient retrofitting methods under three categorical sectors—visual comfort (daylight-based zoning, shadings); thermal comfort and ventilation (solar radiation-based zoning, central atrium plus interior openings, insulation, and window replacement); energy consumption (efficient lighting system, and controllers, material and HVAC system optimization, PV panels as the renewable energy source). This chapter further substantiates these theoretical underpinnings with an implemented design scheme—an educational building within a cold semiarid climatic condition—to showcase the on-ground impact of these retrofitting strategies in reducing the energy used for heating and cooling and lighting purposes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document