Point-of-care ultrasound in internal medicine: A position paper by the ultrasound working group of the European federation of internal medicine

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 67-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Torres-Macho ◽  
T. Aro ◽  
I. Bruckner ◽  
C. Cogliati ◽  
O.H. Gilja ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
Ben Chadwick ◽  
◽  
Nick Murch ◽  
Anika Wijewardane ◽  
◽  
...  

Editor- Thank you for giving us the opportunity to respond to the letter received regarding the Joint Royal College of Physicians Training Board (JRCPTB) curriculum for Acute Internal Medicine (AIM) that has previously been circulated for comment and consideration of implementation in August 2022. Dr Williamson is correct in asserting that the proposed curriculum hopes to produce doctors with generic professional and specialty specific capabilities needed to manage patients presenting with a wide range of medical symptoms and conditions. It does aim to produce a workforce that reflects the current trends of increasing patient attendances to both primary care and emergency departments- one that has a high level of diagnostic reasoning, the ability to manage uncertainty, deal with co-morbidities and recognise when specialty input is required in a variety of settings, including ambulatory and critical care. Contrary to the situation described in the correspondence, the new curriculum does not move away from each trainee being required to develop a specialist skill, such as medical education, management, stroke medicine or focused echocardiography. Trainees will still need to acquire competency in a specialist skill for their final 36 months of their training programme, usually after they have completed their Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) certification. The thinking behind introducing mandatory POCUS in the curriculum is that: POCUS is in the proposed curricula for intensive care medicine, respiratory medicine and emergency medicine, therefore we feel that in order to recruit the best trainees it is imperative POCUS training is offered as standard As evidenced by the trainee surveys, they often do not get allocated time to develop their specialist skill, especially in the early years of Higher Specialty Training before they often have decided on a particular skill. The introduction of mandatory POCUS training should legtimise time off the ward to obtain this skill early in training. POCUS is becoming more and more standardised in 21st Century acute care alongside the reducing costs of Ultrasound probe e.g. Philips Lumify and Butterfly iQ which are compatible with smart phones POCUS has been heralded as the fifth pillar of examination (observation, palpation, percussion, auscultation, insonation)1 The proposed curriculum therefore facilitates trainees to have regular dedicated time to develop interests inside or outside acute medicine to supplement their professional experience and training. This will also enable trainees to have time away from the ‘front door’ high intensity acute care. Mandatory POCUS will continue to set AIM training apart from other physician training programmes and continue to attract high quality trainees to apply to the specialty. Formal feedback seen at the SAC meeting in October 2019 to the draft curriculum (personal correspondence from JRCPTB) showed a positive response from nine individuals, an ambivalent one from two people, and only two against the introduction of formal POCUS training in the curriculum. Point of Care Ultrasound will likely be a welcome addition to the curriculum and will benefit patients, trainees and front door services up and down the country. Concerns regarding supervision are being addressed by the POCUS working group, in anticipation of the lead in period of well over two years. It is anticipated that most trainees can achieve POCUS sign off (e.g. Focused Acute Medical Ultrasound) in 6 to 12 months (personal correspondence Nick Smallwood from POCUS working group). With ongoing concerns regarding recruitment and retention in Acute Internal Medicine we agree strongly that with POCUS inclusion, we have a further selling point for AIM training.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Lewis ◽  
Leslie Martin ◽  
Adam Mazzetti ◽  
Abubaker Khalifa ◽  
Karen Geukers ◽  
...  

Background Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) is an ultrasound examination performed by the clinician to answer a focused question or guide an invasive procedure. Despite gaining popularity and evidence supporting the use of PoCUS, core Internal Medicine (IM) residency programs in Canada have yet to implement a comprehensive PoCUS curriculum. The objective of this study was to create a formal PoCUS curriculum. Methods We conducted a systematic needs assessment with a survey that assessed IM attending and resident comfort, training, and application of PoCUS. We also performed a literature review of selected PoCUS-guided procedures and diagnostics to assess the evidence. A working group analyzed the collected data and designed a graduated 3-year curriculum. Results The needs assessment demonstrated that PoCUS education was both necessary and in high demand. The PoCUS-guided procedures and diagnostics that were identified by the survey to be necessary for IM training were then evaluated by a literature review. Based on the evidence, a progressive 3-year curriculum was created. The working group decided on the method and timing of curriculum delivery. Conclusion McMaster University is the first IM residency program to introduce a graduated 3-year curriculum complete with competency assessment and quality assurance. Résumé Contexte L'échographie ponctuelle est un examen d'échographie effectué par le clinicien pour répondre à une question ciblée ou guider une procédure invasive. Malgré l'obtention de la popularité et des preuves appuyant l'utilisation de la messagerie instantanée, les programmes de résidence au Canada pour la médecine interne de base (GI) n'ont pas encore mis en œuvre un programme exhaustif. L'objectif de cette étude était de créer un programme d'études officiel. Méthodes Nous avons effectué une évaluation systématique des besoins avec un sondage qui évaluait la présence de GI et le confort des résidents, la formation et l'application de ces programmes. Nous avons également effectué un examen de la documentation de certaines procédures et diagnostics guidés pour évaluer la preuve. Un groupe de travail a analysé les données collectées et conçu un programme gradué de trois ans. Résultats L'évaluation des besoins a démontré que l'éducation était à la fois nécessaire et trèsdemandée. Les procédures et les diagnostics qui ont été identifiés par le sondage comme étant nécessaires à la formation en GI ont ensuite été évalués par un examen de la documentation. Sur la base des données probantes, un programme d'études progressive de trois ans a été créé. Le groupe de travail a décidé de la méthode et ducalendrier de l'exécution des programmes. Conclusion L'Université McMaster est le premier programme de résidence en GI à présenter un programme gradué de trois ans complété par l'évaluation des compétences et l'assurance de la qualité.    


Author(s):  
Marc H.M. Thelen ◽  
Florent J.L.A. Vanstapel ◽  
Christos Kroupis ◽  
Ines Vukasovic ◽  
Guilaime Boursier ◽  
...  

AbstractThe recent revision of ISO15189 has further strengthened its position as the standard for accreditation for medical laboratories. Both for laboratories and their customers it is important that the scope of such accreditation is clear. Therefore the European co-operation for accreditation (EA) demands that the national bodies responsible for accreditation describe the scope of every laboratory accreditation in a way that leaves no room for doubt about the range of competence of the particular laboratories. According to EA recommendations scopes may be fixed, mentioning every single test that is part of the accreditation, or flexible, mentioning all combinations of medical field, examination type and materials for which the laboratory is competent. Up to now national accreditation bodies perpetuate use of fixed scopes, partly by inertia, partly out of fear that a too flexible scope may lead to over-valuation of the competence of laboratories, most countries only use fixed scopes. The EA however promotes use of flexible scopes, since this allows for more readily innovation, which contributes to quality in laboratory medicine. In this position paper, the Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN Standards belonging to the Quality and Regulation Committee of the EFLM recommends using an approach that has led to successful introduction of the flexible scope for ISO15189 accreditation as intended in EA-4/17 in The Netherlands. The approach is risk-based, discipline and competence-based, and focuses on defining a uniform terminology transferable across the borders of scientific disciplines, laboratories and countries.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 2209-2215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron M. Baston ◽  
Paul Wallace ◽  
Wilma Chan ◽  
Anthony J. Dean ◽  
Nova Panebianco

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1130-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Schnobrich ◽  
Benji K. Mathews ◽  
Bernard E. Trappey ◽  
Brian K. Muthyala ◽  
Andrew P. J. Olson

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. JMECD.S18932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Nardi ◽  
David J. Shaw ◽  
Stanley A. Amundson ◽  
James N. Phan ◽  
Bruce J. Kimura

Over the past two decades, our internal medicine residency has created a unique postgraduate education in internal medicine by incorporating a formal curriculum in point-of-care cardiac ultrasound as a mandatory component. The details regarding content and implementation were critical to the initial and subsequent success of this novel program. In this paper, we discuss the evidence-based advances, considerations, and pitfalls that we have encountered in the program's development through the discussion of four unanticipated tasks unique to a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum. The formatted discussion of these tasks will hopefully assist development of ultrasound programs at other institutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document