Effect of automated tube voltage selection, integrated circuit detector and advanced iterative reconstruction on radiation dose and image quality of 3rd generation dual-source aortic CT angiography: An intra-individual comparison

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 972-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Mangold ◽  
Carlo N. De Cecco ◽  
Julian L. Wichmann ◽  
Christian Canstein ◽  
Akos Varga-Szemes ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 2677-2684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksander W. Krazinski ◽  
Felix G. Meinel ◽  
U. Joseph Schoepf ◽  
Justin R. Silverman ◽  
Christian Canstein ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 3608-3616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Mangold ◽  
Julian L. Wichmann ◽  
U. Joseph Schoepf ◽  
Zachary B. Poole ◽  
Christian Canstein ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1643-1650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix G. Meinel ◽  
Christian Canstein ◽  
U. Joseph Schoepf ◽  
Martin Sedlmaier ◽  
Bernhard Schmidt ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0256564
Author(s):  
Jung Han Hwang ◽  
Jin Mo Kang ◽  
So Hyun Park ◽  
Suyoung Park ◽  
Jeong Ho Kim ◽  
...  

Objective We compared the image quality according to the radiation dose on computed tomography (CT) venography at 80 kVp using advanced modeled iterative reconstruction for deep vein thrombus and other specific clinical conditions considering standard-, low-, and ultralow-dose CT. Methods In this retrospective study, 105 consecutive CT venography examinations were included using a third-generation dual-source scanner in the dual-source mode in tubes A (reference mAs, 210 mAs at 70%) and B (reference mAs, 90 mAs at 30%) at a fixed 80 kVp. Two radiologists independently reviewed each observation of standard- (100% radiation dose), low- (70%), and ultralow-dose (30%) CT. The objective quality of large veins and subjective image quality regarding lower-extremity veins and deep vein thrombus were compared between images according to the dose. In addition, the CT dose index volumes were displayed from the images. Results From the patients, 24 presented deep vein thrombus in 69 venous segments of CT examinations. Standard-dose CT provided the lowest image noise at the inferior vena cava and femoral vein compared with low- and ultralow-dose CT (p < 0.001). There were no differences regarding subjective image quality between the images of popliteal and calf veins at the three doses (e.g., 3.8 ± 0.7, right popliteal vein, p = 0.977). The image quality of the 69 deep vein thrombus segments showed equally slightly higher scores in standard- and low-dose CT (4.0 ± 0.2) than in ultralow-dose CT (3.9 ± 0.4). The CT dose index volumes were 4.4 ± 0.6, 3.1 ± 0.4, and 1.3 ± 0.2 mGy for standard-, low-, and ultralow-dose CT, respectively. Conclusions Low- and ultralow-dose CT venography at 80 kVp using an advanced model based iterative reconstruction algorithm allows to evaluate deep vein thrombus and perform follow-up examinations while showing an acceptable image quality and reducing the radiation dose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1775-1786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Ah Park ◽  
Whal Lee ◽  
Kwang Woo Kim ◽  
Kwang Gi Kim ◽  
Allmendinger Thomas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document