Comparable survival benefit of local excision versus radical resection for 10- to 20-mm rectal neuroendocrine tumors

Author(s):  
Qichen Chen ◽  
Jinghua Chen ◽  
Zhen Huang ◽  
Hong Zhao ◽  
Jianqiang Cai
2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Fields ◽  
Lily V. Saadat ◽  
Rebecca E. Scully ◽  
Jennifer S. Davids ◽  
Joel E. Goldberg ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jie-bin Xie ◽  
Yue-shan Pang ◽  
Xun Li ◽  
Xiao-ting Wu

Abstract Background Current studies on the number of removed lymph nodes (LNs) and their prognostic value in small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) are limited. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic value of removed LNs for SBNETs. Methods SBNET patients without distant metastasis from 2004 to 2017 in the SEER database were included. The optimal cutoff values of examined LNs (ELNs) and negative LNs (NLNs) were calculated by the X-tile software. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done to match patients 1:1 on clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression model were used to evaluate the prognostic effect of removed LNs. Results The cutoff values of 14 for ELNs and 9 for NLNs could well distinguish patients with different prognoses. After 1:1 PSM, the differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups were significantly reduced (all P > 0.05). Removal of more than one LN significantly improved the prognosis of the patients (P < 0.001). The number of lymphatic metastasis in the sufficiently radical resection group (SRR, 3.74 ± 3.278, ELN > 14 and NLN > 9) was significantly more than that in the insufficiently radical resection group (ISRR, 2.72 ± 3.19, ELN < 14 or NLN < 9). The 10-year overall survival (OS) of the SRR was significantly better than that of the ISRR (HR = 1.65, P = 0.001, 95% CI: 1.24–2.19). Conclusion Both ELNs and NLNs can well predict the OS of patients. Systematic removal of more than 14 LNs and more than 9 NLNs can increase the OS of SBNET patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2795-2803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Polcz ◽  
Cameron Schlegel ◽  
Gretchen C. Edwards ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Marcus Tan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 668-668
Author(s):  
Erica S Tsang ◽  
Yarrow Jean McConnell ◽  
David F. Schaeffer ◽  
Caroline Speers ◽  
Hagen F. Kennecke

668 Background: Optimal management of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is not well defined. We characterized the clinicopathologic features, loco-regional, and systemic management of a population-based cohort of rectal NETs. Methods: Patients diagnosed with rectal NETs from 1999-2011 were identified from British Columbia provincial databases. NETs were classified as G1 and G2 tumors with a Ki-67 ≤ 20% and/or mitotic count ≤ 20 per high power field. Results: Of 91 rectal NETs, median age was 58 (IQR 48-65) years and 35 (38%) were male. Median tumor size was 6 (IQR 4-8) mm. Median overall survival was 164.7 months, with 3 patients presenting with stage IV disease. Treatment included local excision (n = 79), surgical resection (n = 6), and pelvic radiation (n = 1; T3N1 tumor). Final margin status was positive in 17 (20%) cases. Local relapse occurred in 8 (9%) cases, and one relapse to bone 13 months after T3N1 tumor resection. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between local relapse and T classification, Ki-67, mitotic count, grade, and perineural invasion (p< 0.01), but not N or M classification, or lymphovascular invasion. Local relapse was not associated with surgical management or margin status. Of 3 patients with metastatic disease, two received systemic management, with capecitabine and temozolomide. Conclusions: Rectal NETs generally presented with small, early tumors and were treated with local excision or surgical resection without pelvic radiation. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document