scholarly journals MON-085 PERCUTANEOUS TENCKHOFF CATHETER INSERTION, A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. S339
Author(s):  
X. SZE ◽  
W.S. Cheong ◽  
H.S. P'ng ◽  
Y.L. Tye ◽  
J. Mohd Idris
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Sham Sundar ◽  
K. Venkataramanan ◽  
Himanshu Verma ◽  
Himanshu Mahapatra ◽  
J. Rajesh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Marina Reis ◽  
Catarina Ribeiro ◽  
Ana Marta Gomes ◽  
Clara Santos ◽  
Daniela Lopes ◽  
...  

Peritonitis is a major peritoneal dialysis complication. Despite a high cure rate, relapsing and repeat peritonitis is associated with Tenckhoff catheter biofilm and multiple episodes of peritoneal damage. In relapsing peritonitis, prompt catheter removal is mandatory; otherwise, in repeat peritonitis, there is not a clear indication for catheter removal. It is questionable if the approach to removal should be different. There are few recent data on repeat and relapsing peritonitis microbiology and clinical outcomes since most studies are from the past decade. This study evaluates the microbiology, clinical outcomes, and impact of relapsing and repeat peritonitis on technique survival and the impact of catheter removal in development of further peritonitis episodes by the same microorganism. We developed a single-center retrospective study from 1998 to 2019 that compared repeat and relapsing peritonitis with a control group in terms of causative microorganisms, cure rate, catheter removal, and permanent and temporary transfer to hemodialysis. We also compared repeat and relapsing peritonitis clinical outcomes when Tenckhoff catheter was not removed. Comparing to the control group, the repeat/relapsing group had a higher cure rate (80.4% versus 74.5%, p = 0.01 ) and lower rate of hospitalization (10.9% versus 27.7%, p = 0.01 ). Technique survival was superior in the repeat/relapsing group (log rank = 4.5, p = 0.03 ). Gram-positive peritonitis was more common in the repeat/relapsing group especially Streptococci viridans (43.5% versus 21.3%, p = 0.01 ) and Gram-negatives in the control group (26.6% vs 9.0%, p = 0.02 ). When the Tenckhoff catheter was not removed after a repeat episode, 58.6% developed a new repeat/relapsing episode versus 60.0% in the relapsing group. Although repeat and relapsing peritonitis have a higher cure rate, it leads to further episodes of peritonitis and consequent morbidity. When Tenckhoff catheter was not removed, the probability of another peritonitis episode by the same microorganism is similar in repeat and relapsing peritonitis.


2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Ming Chow ◽  
Cheuk Chun Szeto ◽  
Chi Bon Leung ◽  
Bonnie Ching Ha Kwan ◽  
Wing Fai Pang ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe practice of Tenckhoff catheter insertion by nephrologists remains uncommon in most countries.MethodsWe report our single-center experience of Tenckhoff catheter insertion by nephrologists using the open dissection surgical technique in a dedicated ward-based procedure room.ResultsBetween November 2005 and September 2008, 250 peritoneal catheters were inserted by 6 nephrologists with varying levels of experience. Surgical dissection followed by exposure of the peritoneum under direct vision was performed under local anesthesia. Primary catheter failure, as defined by catheters that failed to function within 1 month after insertion, occurred in 2.8% of cases. Within 1 month of catheter insertion, 20 patients developed infectious complications: 9 (3.6%) peritonitis, and 11 (4.4%) exit-site infections; none of these complications led to catheter removal. Mean technique survival for the catheters was 41.2 months (95% confidence interval: 39.5 months to 42.9 months). Catheter survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 92.7% and 87.2% respectively.ConclusionsWe reported an encouraging outcome for Tenckhoff catheters inserted by nephrologists in an open surgical manner, with a 2-year catheter survival of 87.2% and a good safety profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document