A synergistic study of reaction kinetics and heat transfer with multi-component modelling approach for the pyrolysis of biomass waste

Energy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 117933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hammad Siddiqi ◽  
Usha Kumari ◽  
Subrata Biswas ◽  
Asmita Mishra ◽  
B.C. Meikap
Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (17) ◽  
pp. 5485
Author(s):  
Rajendra S. Rajpoot ◽  
Shanmugam. Dhinakaran ◽  
Md. Mahbub Alam

The present study deals with the numerical simulation of mixed convective heat transfer from an unconfined heated square cylinder using nanofluids (Al2O3-water) for Reynolds number (Re) 10–150, Richardson number (Ri) 0–1, and nanoparticles volume fractions (φ) 0–5%. Two-phase modelling approach (i.e., Eulerian-mixture model) is adopted to analyze the flow and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids. A square cylinder with a constant temperature higher than that of the ambient is exposed to a uniform flow. The governing equations are discretized and solved by using a finite volume method employing the SIMPLE algorithm for pressure–velocity coupling. The thermo-physical properties of nanofluids are calculated from the theoretical models using a single-phase approach. The flow and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids are studied for considered parameters and compared with those of the base fluid. The temperature field and flow structure around the square cylinder are visualized and compared for single and multi-phase approaches. The thermal performance under thermal buoyancy conditions for both steady and unsteady flow regimes is presented. Minor variations in flow and thermal characteristics are observed between the two approaches for the range of nanoparticle volume fractions considered. Variation in φ affects CD when Reynolds number is varied from 10 to 50. Beyond Reynolds number 50, no significant change in CD is observed with change in φ. The local and mean Nusselt numbers increase with Reynolds number, Richardson number, and nanoparticle volume fraction. For instance, the mean Nusselt number of nanofluids at Re = 100, φ = 5%, and Ri = 1 is approximately 12.4% higher than that of the base fluid. Overall, the thermal enhancement ratio increases with φ and decreases with Re regardless of Ri variation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 112051
Author(s):  
Francesco Edemetti ◽  
Emanuela Martelli ◽  
Alessandro Del Nevo ◽  
Fabio Giannetti ◽  
Pietro Arena ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 1876-1889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tapio Salmi ◽  
Henrik Grénman ◽  
Johan Wärnå ◽  
Dmitry Yu. Murzin

2014 ◽  
Vol 625 ◽  
pp. 620-625
Author(s):  
T. Irii ◽  
S. Murata ◽  
Kenichiro Tanoue ◽  
T. Nishimura ◽  
Y. Uemura ◽  
...  

As Japan has many mountains with steep slopes, it is difficult to transport felled trees. Therefore, the development of a high-quality, compact gasifier that can cope with variations both in the amount of biomass collected and in energy demand, is necessary. Furthermore, in order to ensure that the system is used in the most efficient manner, it is necessary to increase our understanding of the reaction mechanisms involved in both the decomposition of biomass and heat transfer in the packed bed of biomass.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Emdadul Hoque ◽  
Fazlur Rashid

Reduction of conventional fuel has encouraged to find new sources of renewable energy. Oil produced from the pyrolysis method using biomass is considered as an emerging source of renewable energy. Pyrolytic oil produced in pyrolysis needs to be upgraded to produce bio-oil that can be used with conventional fuel. However, pyrolytic oil contains high amounts of oxygen that lower the calorific value of fuel, creates corrosion, and makes the operation unstable. On the other hand, the up-gradation process of pyrolytic oil involves solvent and catalyst material that requires a high cost. In this regard, the co-pyrolysis method can be used to upgrade the pyrolytic oil where two or more feedstock materials are involved. The calorific value and oil yield in the co-pyrolysis method are higher than pyrolytic oil. Also, the upgraded oil in the co-pyrolysis method contains low water that can improve the fuel property. Therefore, the co-pyrolysis of biomass waste is an emerging source of energy. Among different biomasses, solid waste and aquatic plants are significantly used as feedstock in the co-pyrolysis method. As a consequence, pressure on conventional fuel can be reduced to fulfill the demand for global energy. Moreover, the associated operating and production cost of the co-pyrolysis method is comparatively low. This method also reduces environmental pollution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document