scholarly journals Use of (Q)SAR genotoxicity predictions and fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for priority ranking of ethoxyquin transformation products

2022 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. 106875
Author(s):  
J.D. Rasinger ◽  
F. Frenzel ◽  
A. Braeuning ◽  
A. Bernhard ◽  
R. Ørnsrud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Transformation Products ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Priority Ranking

scholarly journals A A RESOURCE ALLOCATION PROBLEM IN HIGHER EDUCATION WITH INTEGRATED MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING

Sepren ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 34-45
Author(s):  
Dame Ifa Sihombing ◽  
Lamtiur Sinambela ◽  
Labuan Nababan
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Goal Programming ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Priority Ranking ◽  
Education Resource ◽  
Gp Model

This paper  analyzes forms of resource allocation problems in higher education. Resource allocation is one of the major decision problems arising in higher education. Resources must be allocated optimally is such a way that performance of universities can be improved. It combines two of the most extended multicriteria decision making techniques: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Goal Programming (GP). The AHP approach is used in evaluation all criteria such as qualitative and quantitative factors. Then the Goal Programming (GP) model incorporating the constraints to select the best set of all goals without exceeding the limited avalaible resources. In this paper two commercial packages are used : Expert Choice for determining the AHP priority ranking of the projects, and LINGO 17 for solving the GP model.

scholarly journals Sustainability in the Business Sector: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Financial Leasing Company Selection of the Vietnamese SMEs

SAGE Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824402110360
Author(s):  
Fengsheng Chien ◽  
Chia-Nan Wang ◽  
Ka Yin Chau ◽  
Van Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Viet Tinh Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Interest Rates ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Primary Concern ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Financial Leasing ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Leasing Company ◽  
Selection Of

The uses and management of capital is extremely important to the operation of any businesses. However, not all businesses have available capital, so the use of loans in many different forms is always an effective solution in managing corporate finance. Accompanying with businesses, many financial leasing companies have implemented products and programs to lend money to businesses with low interest rates. So, choosing the best financial leasing company is a primary concern of businesses. To increase competitiveness, financial leasing companies often offer preferential conditions to attract businesses. Choosing the best financial leasing service to leasing is important and necessary to those businesses. Thus, the selection of a financial leasing company by small and medium enterprises benefits from the application of Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods which allows the decision maker to consider various qualitative and quantitative criteria. In this article, the author applied Fuzzy Analytical Network Process (FANP) to calculate the related criteria weights of the financial leasing company selection problem of businesses. Then, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied to rank the potential decision-making units. This research establishes one complete and efficient model for financial leasing company selection using FANP and TOPSIS methods. The proposed model is then applied into a real-world case study to demonstrate its feasibility.

Optimal ecodesign selection for biodiesel production in biorefineries through multicriteria decision making

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Andrea González-Cruz ◽  
Luis Fernando Morales-Mendoza ◽  
Alberto Alfonso Aguilar-Lasserre ◽  
Catherine Azzaro-Pantel ◽  
Paulina Martínez-Isidro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Biodiesel Production ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Selection For

scholarly journals Approaches for multicriteria decision-making based on the hesitant fuzzy best–worst method

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Li-li Niu ◽  
Qiongxia Chen ◽  
Zhong-xing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Programming Model ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Preference Relations ◽  
Fuzzy Preference Relations ◽  
Decision Making Models ◽  
Best Worst Method

AbstractHesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs) have been widely applied in multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) for their ability to efficiently express hesitant information. To address the situation where HFPRs are necessary, this paper develops several decision-making models integrating HFPRs with the best worst method (BWM). First, consistency measures from the perspectives of additive/multiplicative consistent hesitant fuzzy best worst preference relations (HFBWPRs) are introduced. Second, several decision-making models are developed in view of the proposed additive/multiplicatively consistent HFBWPRs. The main characteristic of the constructed models is that they consider all the values included in the HFBWPRs and consider the same and different compromise limit constraints. Third, an absolute programming model is developed to obtain the decision-makers’ objective weights utilizing the information of optimal priority weight vectors and provides the calculation of decision-makers’ comprehensive weights. Finally, a framework of the MCDM procedure based on hesitant fuzzy BWM is introduced, and an illustrative example in conjunction with comparative analysis is provided to demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed models.

scholarly journals Prioritization in Strategic Environmental Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method with Random Generation for Absent Information in South Korea

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1458
Author(s):  
Daeryong Park ◽  
Huan-Jung Fan ◽  
Jun-Jie Zhu ◽  
Taesoon Kim ◽  
Myoung-Jin Um ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
River Basins ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Missing Information ◽  
Nakdong River ◽  
Han River ◽  
Priority Ranking ◽  
The Nakdong River

This study evaluated a fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) as a multicriteria decision making system that compensates for missing information with undefined weight factor criteria. The suggested Fuzzy TOPSIS was applied to ten potential dam sites in three river basins (the Han River, the Geum River, and the Nakdong River basins) in South Korea. To assess potential dam sites, the strategic environment assessment (SEA) monitored four categories: national preservation, endangered species, water quality, and toxic environment. To consider missing information, this study applied the Monte Carlo Simulation method with uniform and normal distributions. The results show that effects of missing information generation with one fuzzy set in GB1 site of the Geum River basin are not great in fuzzy positive-ideal solution (FPIS) and fuzzy negative-ideal solution (FNIS) estimations. However, the combination of two fuzzy sets considering missing information in Gohyun stream (NG) and Hoenggye stream (NH) sites of the Nakdong River basin has a great effect on estimating FPIS, FNIS, and priority ranking in Fuzzy TOPSIS applications. The sites with the highest priority ranking in the Han River, Geum River, and Nakdong River basins based on Fuzzy TOPSIS are the Dal stream 1 (HD1), Bocheong stream 2 (GB2) and NG sites. Among the sites in all river basins, the GB2 site had the highest priority ranking. Consequently, the results coincided with findings of previous studies based on multicriteria decision making with missing information and show the applicability of Fuzzy TOPSIS when evaluating priority rankings in cases with missing information.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document