Quantile Regression as a Generic Approach for Estimating Uncertainty of Digital Soil Maps Produced from Machine-Learning

Author(s):  
Babak Kasraei ◽  
Brandon Heung ◽  
Daniel D. Saurette ◽  
Margaret G. Schmidt ◽  
Chuck E. Bulmer ◽  
...  
Geoderma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 400 ◽  
pp. 115230
Author(s):  
Zisis Gagkas ◽  
Allan Lilly ◽  
Nikki J. Baggaley

2021 ◽  
pp. e00437
Author(s):  
Andri Baltensweiler ◽  
Lorenz Walthert ◽  
Marc Hanewinkel ◽  
Stephan Zimmermann ◽  
Madlene Nussbaum

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
László Pásztor ◽  
Annamária Laborczi ◽  
Katalin Takács ◽  
Gábor Szatmári ◽  
Endre Dobos ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia Papacharalampous ◽  
Hristos Tyralis ◽  
Andreas Langousis ◽  
Amithirigala W. Jayawardena ◽  
Bellie Sivakumar ◽  
...  

We conduct a large-scale benchmark experiment aiming to advance the use of machine-learning quantile regression algorithms for probabilistic hydrological post-processing “at scale” within operational contexts. The experiment is set up using 34-year-long daily time series of precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration and streamflow for 511 catchments over the contiguous United States. Point hydrological predictions are obtained using the Génie Rural à 4 paramètres Journalier (GR4J) hydrological model and exploited as predictor variables within quantile regression settings. Six machine-learning quantile regression algorithms and their equal-weight combiner are applied to predict conditional quantiles of the hydrological model errors. The individual algorithms are quantile regression, generalized random forests for quantile regression, generalized random forests for quantile regression emulating quantile regression forests, gradient boosting machine, model-based boosting with linear models as base learners and quantile regression neural networks. The conditional quantiles of the hydrological model errors are transformed to conditional quantiles of daily streamflow, which are finally assessed using proper performance scores and benchmarking. The assessment concerns various levels of predictive quantiles and central prediction intervals, while it is made both independently of the flow magnitude and conditional upon this magnitude. Key aspects of the developed methodological framework are highlighted, and practical recommendations are formulated. In technical hydro-meteorological applications, the algorithms should be applied preferably in a way that maximizes the benefits and reduces the risks from their use. This can be achieved by (i) combining algorithms (e.g., by averaging their predictions) and (ii) integrating algorithms within systematic frameworks (i.e., by using the algorithms according to their identified skills), as our large-scale results point out.


Geoderma ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 241-242 ◽  
pp. 238-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.F.A. Bishop ◽  
A. Horta ◽  
S.B. Karunaratne
Keyword(s):  

Geoderma ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 171-172 ◽  
pp. 24-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Lin Sun ◽  
Yu-Guo Zhao ◽  
Hui-Li Wang ◽  
Lin Yang ◽  
Cheng-Zhi Qin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Mzid ◽  
Stefano Pignatti ◽  
Irina Veretelnikova ◽  
Raffaele Casa

<p>The application of digital soil mapping in precision agriculture is extremely important, since an assessment of the spatial variability of soil properties within cultivated fields is essential in order to optimize agronomic practices such as fertilization, sowing, irrigation and tillage. In this context, it is necessary to develop methods which rely on information that can be obtained rapidly and at low cost. In the present work, an assessment is carried out of what are the most useful covariates to include in the digital soil mapping of field-scale properties of agronomic interest such as texture (clay, sand, silt), soil organic matter and pH in different farms of the Umbria Region in Central Italy. In each farm a proximal sensing-based mapping of the apparent soil electrical resistivity was carried out using the EMAS (Electro-Magnetic Agro Scanner) sensor. Soil sampling and subsequent analysis in the laboratory were carried out in each field. Different covariates were then used in the development of digital soil maps: apparent resistivity, high resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from Lidar data, and bare soil and/or vegetation indices derived from Sentinel-2 images of the experimental fields. The approach followed two steps: (i) estimation of the variables using a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) model, (ii) spatial interpolation via prediction models (including regression kriging and block kriging). The validity of the digital soil maps results was assessed both in terms of the accuracy in the estimation of soil properties and in terms of their impact on the fertilization prescription maps for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K).</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth John Locey ◽  
Thomas A Webb ◽  
Sana Farooqui ◽  
Bala Hota

Background: US hospital safety is routinely measured via patient safety indicators (PSIs). Receiving a score for most PSIs requires a minimum number of qualifying cases, which are partly determined by whether the associated diagnosis-related group (DRG) was surgical and whether the surgery was elective. While these criteria can exempt hospitals from PSIs, it remains to be seen whether exemption is driven by low volume, small numbers of DRGs, or perhaps, policies that determine how procedures are classified as elective. Methods: Using Medicare inpatient claims data from 4,069 hospitals between 2015 and 2017, we examined how percentages of elective procedures relate to numbers of surgical claims and surgical DRGs. We used a combination of quantile regression and machine learning based anomaly detection to characterize these relationships and identify outliers. We then used a set of machine learning algorithms to test whether outliers were explained by the DRGs they reported. Results: Average percentages of elective procedures generally decreased from 100% to 60% in relation to the number of surgical claims and the number of DRGs among them. Some providers with high volumes of claims had anomalously low percentages of elective procedures (5% to 40%). These low elective outliers were not explained by the particular surgical DRGs among their claims. However, among hospitals exempted from PSIs, those with the greatest volume of claims were always low elective outliers. Conclusion: Some hospitals with relatively high numbers of surgical claims may have classified procedures as non-elective in a way that ultimately exempted them from certain PSIs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document