scholarly journals Treatment with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (calcifediol) is associated with a reduction in the blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio marker of disease severity in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a pilot, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled double blind clinical trial

Author(s):  
Zhila Maghbooli ◽  
Mohammad Ali Sahraian ◽  
Saeid Reza Jamali-Moghadam ◽  
Asma Asadi ◽  
M.D. Azadeh zarei ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e03-e03
Author(s):  
Saeed Mardani ◽  
Farzaneh Kadkhodaei-Elyaderani ◽  
Ali Momeni ◽  
Maryam Saeedi

Introduction: Diabetic nephropathy (diabetic kidney disease) is the most common cause of renal failure. Objectives: Regarding the role of allopurinol in the improvement of diabetic kidney disease, this study aimed to investigate the ameliorative effect of allopurinol in diabetic nephropathy patients. Patients and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial study was performed on 60 patients with diabetic kidney disease referenced to nephrology clinic during 2019-2020. Patients were divided into case (treated with allopurinol 100 mg/d) and control (received placebo pill) groups. Three and six months of intervention, complete blood count (CBC), fasting blood sugar levels (FBS), serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, creatinine (Cr) and uric acid (UA) levels, 24 hours urinary protein, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were measured and compared between the two groups. Results: After six months, reduction of UA and 24 hours urinary protein were not significant in the control group (P > 0.05) but it was significant in the allopurinol group (P < 0.05). In the allopurinol group, NLR and PLR levels decreased significantly during the six months (P < 0.01) however there was no significant change in the control group (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Low dosage of allopurinol (100 mg/d) reduces UA, proteinuria, NLR and PLR in patients after six months. Therefore it can be used for diabetic nephropathy patients as a supplementary, inexpensive and safe treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taghi Amiriani ◽  
Niloofar Rajabli ◽  
Maryam Faghani ◽  
Sima Besharat ◽  
Gholamreza Roshandel ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel diseases are managed by different methods, which may not be well tolerated because of their side effects. Recently, pro-prebiotics are considered as a supplementary treatment in gastrointestinal diseases. In this study, the effect of Lactocare® (ZistTakhmir Company) was investigated on the disease severity in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial (Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials number: IRCT201407271264N5), 60 patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis were included. An 8-week trial was carried out comparing Lactocare® as a supplement with standard therapy against placebo. Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) was measured at baseline and after 8 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using paired ttest to assess the temporal changes (before and after the treatment) in the mean of SCCAI in each group. Chi-square test was used to compare the response rates. Odds ratios (OR) and the 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were also calculated. p values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS A significant decreased mean SCCAI was seen in the intervention group (4.56 ± 2.56) vs. placebo group (6.54 ± 2.47) (p < 0.05). Response to treatment was seen in 64.3% of the treatment group vs. 47% in the placebo group (p = 0.18). Response to treatment was observed in 90.9% of patients with ulcerative colitis for more than 5 years compared with 44.4% of the control group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Regarding the effectiveness of pre-probiotics in mitigating symptoms in patients with ulcerative colitis, it could be suggested to try pre-probiotics in the standard treatment particularly in those with more than five years ofthe disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Maleki Verki ◽  
Kambiz Masoumi ◽  
Hassan Motamed ◽  
Meisam Moezi ◽  
Arash Forouzan ◽  
...  

Background:More than half of the patients attending emergency centers need analgesics. Injectable analgesics are currently the most common pain control strategy, but entail complications. Fentanyl is one of the most commonly used pain-relief opiates available in various forms.Objective:The present study aims to compare analgesic effects of nebulized against intravenous fentanyl for controlling pain due to limb fracture.Method:The present double-blind clinical trial recruited 213 patients presenting with fractured limbs to emergency departments. The first group of patients received 1 micg/kg of intravenous fentanyl citrate from a solution of 50 micg/ml and 5 ml of normal saline in nebulized form (group A), and the second group intravenously received 5 ml of normal saline and 4 micg/kg of 50 micg/ml solution of fentanyl citrate in nebulized form, whose volume reached 5 ml with the addition of normal saline (group B). Then, pain level was frequently measured and compared in the two groups for 20 minutes.Results:The results obtained showed reduced pain level in both the groups. However, point-by-point comparison of pain in the two groups revealed significantly greater pain reduction in intravenous fentanyl group (P<0.001). The need for adjuvant pain relief medication was 8.3% in intravenous fentanyl group and 24% in nebulized fentanyl group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.002).Conclusion:According to the results, although nebulized fentanyl is effective in controlling pain due to limb fracture, it was less effective than intravenous type, and unable to control pain in many cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document