scholarly journals Staged repair of colonic atresia with non-contiguous perforation of the proximal colon

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 101547
Author(s):  
Toshio Sawai ◽  
Shogo Zuo ◽  
Yasuhiro Kuroda ◽  
Hiromichi Kanehiro ◽  
Masayuki Sho
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Colonic Atresia

A Tale of Two Colons and Two Cancers

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gervaz ◽  
Bühler ◽  
Scheiwiller ◽  
Morel
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Splenic Flexure ◽  
Chromosomal Instability ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Colorectal Carcinogenesis ◽  
Physiological Data ◽  
Central Hypothesis ◽  
Group Stratification

The central hypothesis explored in this paper is that colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease. The initial clue to this heterogeneity was provided by genetic findings; however, embryological and physiological data had previously been gathered, showing that proximal (in relation to the splenic flexure) and distal parts of the colon represent distinct entities. Molecular biologists have identified two distinct pathways, microsatellite instability (MSI) and chromosomal instability (CIN), which are involved in CRC progression. In summary, there may be not one, but two colons and two types of colorectal carcinogenesis, with distinct clinical outcome. The implications for the clinicians are two-folds; 1) tumors originating from the proximal colon have a better prognosis due to a high percentage of MSI-positive lesions; and 2) location of the neoplasm in reference to the splenic flexure should be documented before group stratification in future trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II and III colon cancer.

Colonic atresia: the rarest atresia of the gastrointestinal tract

Chirurgia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossella Angotti ◽  
Francesco Molinaro ◽  
Chiara Pellegrino ◽  
Francesco Ferrara ◽  
Edoardo Bindi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Colonic Atresia

Effectiveness of Antibacterials Infused into the Proximal Colon on the Pig

1969 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
H. S. Teague ◽  
A. P. Grifo ◽  
R. L. Harrold ◽  
D. R. Redman
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Colon

scholarly journals Multi-Omics Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Induced Hyperplasia/Dysplasia in the Rag2−/−/Il10−/− Mouse Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 364
Author(s):  
Qiyuan Han ◽  
Thomas J. Y. Kono ◽  
Charles G. Knutson ◽  
Nicola M. Parry ◽  
Christopher L. Seiler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Gastrointestinal Disease ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Helicobacter Hepaticus ◽  
Reduced Representation ◽  
Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Epigenetic dysregulation is hypothesized to play a role in the observed association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colon tumor development. In the present work, DNA methylome, hydroxymethylome, and transcriptome analyses were conducted in proximal colon tissues harvested from the Helicobacter hepaticus (H. hepaticus)-infected murine model of IBD. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and oxidative RRBS (oxRRBS) analyses identified 1606 differentially methylated regions (DMR) and 3011 differentially hydroxymethylated regions (DhMR). These DMR/DhMR overlapped with genes that are associated with gastrointestinal disease, inflammatory disease, and cancer. RNA-seq revealed pronounced expression changes of a number of genes associated with inflammation and cancer. Several genes including Duox2, Tgm2, Cdhr5, and Hk2 exhibited changes in both DNA methylation/hydroxymethylation and gene expression levels. Overall, our results suggest that chronic inflammation triggers changes in methylation and hydroxymethylation patterns in the genome, altering the expression of key tumorigenesis genes and potentially contributing to the initiation of colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals Acceptability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile serrated lesions: comparison with non-sessile serrated lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (12) ◽  
pp. E1832-E1839
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Kuroki ◽  
Toshiyuki Endo ◽  
Kenta Iwahashi ◽  
Naoki Miyao ◽  
Reika Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Serrated Lesions

Abstract Background and study aims Sessile serrated lesions (SSL) are major precursor lesions of serrated pathway cancers, and appropriate treatment may prevent interval colorectal cancer. Studies have reported the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for SSL; however, there are insufficient reports on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We examined the characteristics and outcomes of SSL and compared them to those of non-SSL in ESD. Patients and methods We reviewed 370 consecutive cases in 322 patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2016 and March 2020 at our hospital. There were 267 0-IIa lesions that were stratified into 41 SSL and 226 non-SSL (intramucosal cancer, adenoma) cases. We used propensity matching to adjust for the variances in the factors affecting treatment between the SSL and non-SSL groups. Results In the baseline cases, young women and proximal colon tumor location were significantly more common in the SSL group. There were no statistically significant differences between the SSL and non-SSL groups in terms of en bloc resection rate (97.6 % vs. 99.6 %; P = 0.28), R0 resection rate (92.7 % vs. 93.4 %; P = 0.74), perforation (0 % vs. 0.9 %; P > 0.99), and postoperative bleeding (2.4 % vs. 1.8 %; P = 0.56). Thirty-eight pairs were matched using propensity score, and the median dissection speed (12 vs. 7.7 cm2/h; P = 0.0095) was significantly faster in the SSL than in the non-SSL group. Conclusions ESD for SSL was safely performed, and SSL was smoother to remove than non-SSL. ESD might be an acceptable endoscopic treatment option for SSL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document